I don't understand why Trinidad never got as much **** as Margarito for getting caught with illegal hand wraps. Trinidad is prob not an ATG because he was a dirty fighter and would do anything to win a fight..
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Felix Trinidad an ATG at Welterweight?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by raf727 View Postranking boxers is so biased, there is no objective standard in boxing which i am sure you know. ATG lists or p4p lists, or whatever you want, are all just opinion based.
unless they square off, theres no way of knowing, and thats the god damned truth right there.Last edited by Puya; 12-28-2011, 09:01 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tlaloc View PostI don't understand why Trinidad never got as much **** as Margarito for getting caught with illegal hand wraps. Trinidad is prob not an ATG because he was a dirty fighter and would do anything to win a fight..
The way his father wrapped his hands was not permitted in Las Vegas other states was no problem at all. If you compare Tito's wraps issue with the Margarito you sir are way wrong.
Are you one of the guys who are but hurt because of F. Vargas, Joppy, etc.
or simply a Puerto Rican Hater!!
F. Vargas: " When Trinidad hit me it as getting hit by Mike Tyson".... ROFL talk about self owenage. Tito had serious PowerLast edited by Puya; 12-28-2011, 09:10 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by raf727 View Postranking boxers is so biased, there is no objective standard in boxing which i am sure you know. ATG lists or p4p lists, or whatever you want, are all just opinion based.
unless they square off, theres no way of knowing, and thats the god damned truth right there.
There is no definitive way, no. It will always be subjective. But I think logical conclusions can be reached by using time frame and resume. I can easily show more than ten fighters fought and beat much better welterweight comp than Trinidad. That of course does no good if the reader doesn't know these fighters, the era, or refuses to do the research to actually find out though.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostThere is no definitive way, no. It will always be subjective. But I think logical conclusions can be reached by using time frame and resume. I can easily show more than ten fighters fought and beat much better welterweight comp than Trinidad. That of course does no good if the reader doesn't know these fighters, the era, or refuses to do the research to actually find out though.
MMA uses it and I don't see why boxing doesn't do the same as well.
I like it because it's objective only based. It doesn't let personal feelings get in the way when judging fighters. They're judged off facts only.
http://www.mma-elo.com/ranks.php
Comment
-
Originally posted by tlaloc View PostI don't understand why Trinidad never got as much **** as Margarito for getting caught with illegal hand wraps. Trinidad is prob not an ATG because he was a dirty fighter and would do anything to win a fight.....Are there any serious boxing fans in here? Are u a ******* and just started watching the sport 3 yrs ago? Are u A Mexican hater? Are u just a dumba**? Are u able to do some research before posting ******dd ishh? Do you have a second grade education? Do you understand the diff between plaster and tape? Are u an attention w***e?
Comment
-
Originally posted by FJRod View Post...Are there any serious boxing fans in here? Are u a ******* and just started watching the sport 3 yrs ago? Are u A Mexican hater? Are u just a dumba**? Are u able to do some research before posting ******dd ishh? Do you have a second grade education? Do you understand the diff between plaster and tape? Are u an attention w***e?
Comment
-
Originally posted by FJRod View Post...Are there any serious boxing fans in here? Are u a ******* and just started watching the sport 3 yrs ago? Are u A Mexican hater? Are u just a dumba**? Are u able to do some research before posting ******dd ishh? Do you have a second grade education? Do you understand the diff between plaster and tape? Are u an attention w***e?
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View PostI think a good way of judging older and modern fighters is using the math based ELO system. It's an algorithym based technology used to judge we're fighters are ranked "All Time".
MMA uses it and I don't see why boxing doesn't do the same as well.
I like it because it's objective only based. It doesn't let personal feelings get in the way when judging fighters. They're judged off facts only.
http://www.mma-elo.com/ranks.php
Comment
Comment