Comments Thread For: Wladimir Klitschko: Chisora is a Logical Choice To Fight

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Hammer
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 50797
    • 3,416
    • 8,704
    • 58,851

    #41
    Originally posted by JAB5239
    Wlad has near 60 fights and he's going to fight a guy who has only 14 fights and who has NEVER beaten a top 10 fighter. Give it a rest already because that is just a sad joke!
    If Chisora beats Fury he will actually be 15-0. If he loses and has a record of 14-1, Wlad will fight somebody else for certain. Wlad may decide to fight somebody else even if Chisora wins.

    If Wlad ever fought someone with a record of 19-8, 13-0 or 10-2, then the pathetic haters like you would go into a horrible, insane orgy of Klitschko-bashing!

    Since you're a moderator of the history section, you should try to be more fair and objective.

    Comment

    • JAB5239
      Dallas Cowboys
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 27786
      • 5,057
      • 4,443
      • 73,018

      #42
      Originally posted by Freedom.
      If Chisora beats Fury he will actually be 15-0. If he loses and has a record of 14-1, Wlad will fight somebody else for certain. Wlad may decide to fight somebody else even if Chisora wins.

      If Wlad ever fought someone with a record of 19-8, 13-0 or 10-2, then the pathetic haters like you would go into a horrible, insane orgy of Klitschko-bashing!

      Since you're a moderator of the history section, you should try to be more fair and objective.

      15-0 against not a single top 10 opponent.....that's just great!!!

      Im a moderator to prevent trolls and racists such as yourself from contaminating the history section. Your continued comments and references to my position as such is just more proof of you being a troll. But please, lets not get off the subject of Chisora and Wlad thinking its a logical fight to make.

      Comment

      • The Hammer
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 50797
        • 3,416
        • 8,704
        • 58,851

        #43
        Originally posted by JAB5239

        15-0 against not a single top 10 opponent.....that's just great!!!

        Im a moderator to prevent trolls and racists such as yourself from contaminating the history section. Your continued comments and references to my position as such is just more proof of you being a troll. But please, lets not get off the subject of Chisora and Wlad thinking its a logical fight to make.
        I'm neither a troll nor a racist.

        Your bigotry and hatred toward boxers who were not born in the USA is every bit as nasty as racism.

        I don't post much in the history section anyway. I'd sooner discuss the current scene, than to read old fogies like you posts whine and complain about how much better boxers were when THEY were young.

        Comment

        • Ravens Fan
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2008
          • 4051
          • 167
          • 0
          • 10,372

          #44
          Originally posted by JAB5239

          The difference with Holmes career is he didn't have all the belts. There was quality in the era, but lack of cooperation between ABC orgs prevented one champion from fighting another.
          Quality? That is not the word that I would have thought of when referring to most of Larry's opponents. And if I remember correctly Larry was the first IBF HW champ and for the better part of his career there were only two major alphabet belts, the WBC and WBA.

          Comment

          • JAB5239
            Dallas Cowboys
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 27786
            • 5,057
            • 4,443
            • 73,018

            #45
            Originally posted by Freedom.
            I'm neither a troll nor a racist.

            Your bigotry and hatred toward boxers who were not born in the USA is every bit as nasty as racism.

            I don't post much in the history section anyway. I'd sooner discuss the current scene, than to read old fogies like you posts whine and complain about how much better boxers were when THEY were young.

            No, you're certainly both of those thing as this latest post and dozens of other poster can attest. I root for fighters of every color and every nationality unlike yourself who attacks anyone who doesn't like what he likes. You don't see me irrationally trying to claim Holmes resume is better than what it is, but I do use logic to be up the reasons of everything I say. You on the other hand continue to cheer lead your hero and dismiss any kind of criticism as hate. The only thing I hate about Wlad is the way he fights. I don't blame him for his weak era (though he could make a better choice than untested Chisora) but I will certainly question it.

            Now would you like to keep trolling or do you want to get back to the conversation of Wlad claiming Chisora as a logical next choice?

            Comment

            • JAB5239
              Dallas Cowboys
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 27786
              • 5,057
              • 4,443
              • 73,018

              #46
              Originally posted by Ravens Fan
              Quality? That is not the word that I would have thought of when referring to most of Larry's opponents. And if I remember correctly Larry was the first IBF HW champ and for the better part of his career there were only two major alphabet belts, the WBC and WBA.

              I was speaking of the fighters in the era that Holmes was unable to fight because of the clashing ABC orgs. Holmes held the WBC title before the IBF but relinquished it after Din King tried to lowball him into fighting Greg Page. I understand there were only 2 other irgs, but if you remember that time they were completely against working with one another. Much worse than today.

              Comment

              • richardt
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Nov 2007
                • 22066
                • 2,603
                • 202
                • 77,067

                #47
                Greg Page would beat Chisora and Fury on the same night, back to back. And the still viable at the time Kenny Norton who fought Holmes would kill Chisora and Fury.

                Comment

                • Random1
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Feb 2006
                  • 492
                  • 10
                  • 14
                  • 6,826

                  #48
                  Wlad-Chisora doesn't exactly sound awesome to me, but it WOULD shut up the people who have claimed that Wlad ducked him. As a voluntary I wouldn't really object though, long as the next one was someone higher ranked. Then again the IBF will probably demand he fight Austin/Chambers again which is definitely more distasteful to me than Chisora.

                  Comment

                  • prinzemanspopa
                    queenmanspopa
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 2714
                    • 356
                    • 207
                    • 9,287

                    #49
                    Wladimir has fought nothing but top ten ranked contenders since he became the true champion of the division when he destroyed and outclassed Chris Byrd for a second time.He's fought ten times since then,and only two of those fights featured an opponent that wasn't ranked within the top ten - and one was a mandatory contender who he had to fight,and the other was a late replacement for the top rated Povetkin,who continually avoided Wlad over a two year period,despite being the mandatory challenger for his title.



                    If Povetkin has the testicular fortitude to step inside the same ring as Wladimir Klitschko,that fight will happen and Wlad will destroy him if it does.Wladimir just mentioned him as an opponent just a couple of days ago.

                    Comment

                    • Clegg
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 24674
                      • 3,726
                      • 2,307
                      • 233,274

                      #50
                      I don't think that Chisora is that great of an opponent, but Wlad has already beaten around half of the top heavyweights, one of the other top heavys is his brother, one of the others is about to fight his brother, and another top heavyweight (Povetkin) has ducked him twice.

                      I'd like to see Chisora-Dimitrenko with the winner facing Wlad. But the truth is that I don't give anyone a chance of beating him so it's hard to be too concerned about him facing someone who is still a bit underdeveloped skillswise. At least with guys like Chisora and Arreola, they are likely to come out and really give it a go until they get knocked out. None of this running away and hoping Wlad makes a mistake.

                      Does anyone have a link to the full interview? I saw a bit of it on Sky Sports News, Wlad was talking about how Fury is young and so he has a lot of time, but that he (Wlad) would not want to be that young because at that age you have so much to learn and experience etc.

                      Seemed like an interesting interview but sadly I missed almost all of it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP