True or False: Pacquiao's Welter Resume>>>Floyd's

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ajohnz
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 658
    • 23
    • 2
    • 6,819

    #61
    Originally posted by ThePrince
    Pacquiao's WW resume (2 years):

    De La Hoya (Super Welter, 150 CW fight before Pac)
    Cotto
    Clottey
    Margarito (150 CW, but we've been told over and over again Pac's 8th divisional belt is not legit and Tony was just a blown up welter)
    Mosley

    Floyd's WW resume (6 years):

    Mitchell
    Judah
    Baldomir
    Hatton (light-welter)
    JMM (lightweight)
    Mosley

    So who has the better WW resume? Vote and discuss.

    *Just for argument's sake, let's assume Pac wins against Mosley*
    hey as long as we're adding names to resumes for fights that haven't even taken place go ahead and add pacquiao to mayweather's resume

    Comment

    • pistol whip
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2008
      • 8645
      • 255
      • 4
      • 15,040

      #62
      Originally posted by ThePrince
      Floyd's WW resume (6 years):

      Mitchell
      Judah
      Baldomir
      Hatton (light-welter)
      JMM (lightweight)
      Mosley



      Comment

      • joelab75
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 1535
        • 24
        • 0
        • 7,683

        #63
        Cotto was better than anyone in Floyd's welterweight resume..SIMPLE EXPLANATION AND SIMPLE COMPREHENSION.

        Comment

        • Prime 407
          The Best Around
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 2331
          • 141
          • 185
          • 10,074

          #64
          LOL @ *****'s getting his with the reality stick.

          Comment

          • badass316
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2006
            • 1589
            • 51
            • 0
            • 10,339

            #65
            Originally posted by IronDanHamza
            Just stop it.
            I think you should do a bit of research on Clottey since you obviously haven't seen too much of him. He may not have wins over them but Clottey has Margs (back when people wanted no part of him), Cotto, and Pacquiao on his resume. Those 3 alone pretty much trump anything PBF has on his WW resume.


            Originally posted by £-4-£
            Baldomir was definitely a better win than Cotto and Clottey combined:
            Uhhh... No, Baldomir was not a better win than either Cotto or Clottey, let alone combined (which is utterly laughable). No one even knew Baldomir existed before his win against an uninspired and unprepared Zab.

            Originally posted by £-4-£
            1) Cotto was weight-drained thus giving Manny an unfair advantage. Had the fight been at 147, it would have been more competitive. Manny would have still won, but not as brutally - Cotto would have put up a much better fight.

            2) Clottey was coming off the back of a loss to Cotto, and hadn't fought in 9 months.
            Cotto was weight drained? Cotto came in at 146 in his last fight against Clottey, which is a 1 pound difference in his next fight. So how is that exactly a weight drained Cotto? He certainly didn't look weight drained in the first 4 rounds of that fight, as he gave Pacquiao his toughest test since moving up in weight.

            So what if he hadn't fought in 9 months? Is that supposed to be an excuse as to why Clottey didn't win the fight? Whether you like it or not, Clottey was a big, tough, and rugged welterweight when Pacquiao fought him. He was in the top 5 for a reason.

            Originally posted by £-4-£
            3) Clottey is way over-rated - his only world-title was the vacant IBF title and he won it over a past-prime Zab Judah via a close technical decision.

            4) Baldomir was lineal champion. Cotto was never been lineal champion at Welterweight, and Clottey (lol) he'll probably never win another world title let alone a lineal title.
            How exactly is he overrated? If he is overrated that's news to me. He certainly isn't overrated on this board. His win over Judah was close? Maybe you should actually DL and watch the fight, before coming to conclusions. Clottey was busting Zab up in that fight and was on his way to stopping him.

            So just because Baldomir was lineal champion he's automatically better than Cotto and Clottey...

            I knew it was a waste of time to comment, I should have just skipped to reading your last point and just stopped. That pretty much tells me all I need to know.

            Comment

            • Slick_Rick
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 1660
              • 42
              • 9
              • 8,557

              #66
              Originally posted by £-4-£
              Baldomir was definitely a better win than Cotto and Clottey combined:

              1) Cotto was weight-drained thus giving Manny an unfair advantage. Had the fight been at 147, it would have been more competitive. Manny would have still won, but not as brutally - Cotto would have put up a much better fight.

              2) Clottey was coming off the back of a loss to Cotto, and hadn't fought in 9 months.

              3) Clottey is way over-rated - his only world-title was the vacant IBF title and he won it over a past-prime Zab Judah via a close technical decision.

              4) Baldomir was lineal champion. Cotto was never been lineal champion at Welterweight, and Clottey (lol) he'll probably never win another world title let alone a lineal title.
              Lineal champion or not, but Baldomir is the David Diaz equivalent.

              Comment

              • IronDanHamza
                BoxingScene Icon
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 49276
                • 4,952
                • 269
                • 104,043

                #67
                Originally posted by badass316
                I think you should do a bit of research on Clottey since you obviously haven't seen too much of him. He may not have wins over them but Clottey has Margs (back when people wanted no part of him), Cotto, and Pacquiao on his resume. Those 3 alone pretty much trump anything PBF has on his WW resume.
                ......OK, here's the thing.

                To have them on your resume and to argue he's better than someone, you kinda have to use names that he actually beat. Not people he just fought.

                Saying his resume at 147 is better than Mayweathers merely because he fought Margarito, Cotto and Pacqiauo is just plain ridiculous.

                I guess Demarcus Corley an ATG also? He has names such as;

                Mayweather
                Cotto
                Witter
                Judah
                Alexander
                Maidana

                All on his resume, right?

                Comment

                • Alibata
                  Dugong Maharlika
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • May 2004
                  • 9047
                  • 280
                  • 33
                  • 16,053

                  #68
                  Wow... Can't believe anyone at all voted for Floyd.. It is a given, pacquiao by far. Given the results of the poll, I am surprised the thread is not reflective of it with so many *****s being defensive...It seems like 1 ***** talk as much as 10 boxing fans... No wonder why so many *****s think that everyone thinks like them, the illusion set by their fellow *****s.

                  Comment

                  • letsgobrady
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 6274
                    • 126
                    • 11
                    • 12,670

                    #69
                    manny fought cotto clottey and oscar now which one of those fighters were ranked #1?
                    floyd beat shane and baldomir who were both the #1 ww at the time so how is manny ww resume better?

                    Comment

                    • BoZz
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Apr 2009
                      • 8812
                      • 876
                      • 779
                      • 45,907

                      #70
                      Originally posted by ThePrince
                      Pacquiao's WW resume (2 years):

                      De La Hoya (Super Welter, 150 CW fight before Pac)
                      Cotto
                      Clottey
                      Margarito (150 CW, but we've been told over and over again Pac's 8th divisional belt is not legit and Tony was just a blown up welter)
                      Mosley

                      Floyd's WW resume (6 years):

                      Mitchell
                      Judah
                      Baldomir
                      Hatton (light-welter)
                      JMM (lightweight)
                      Mosley

                      So who has the better WW resume? Vote and discuss.

                      *Just for argument's sake, let's assume Pac wins against Mosley*
                      clottey: was told not to punch back,a bag would do better that night.

                      cotto: damaged by margarito,no coach in the corner.

                      Oscar: weight drained,floyds leftover.

                      Margarito: had to lose weight,got smashed by mosley..damaged good.

                      Mosley: floyds 3rd leftover,old,looked sh** in his last two fights.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP