I thought this discussion was about why improved drug testing is being talked about right now. The simple answer is that one of the two most high profile fighters in the sport has asked for it in order to gain a psychological advantage over an opponent he rightly considers a threat, not because he in on a crusade to clean up the sport. Mayweather is dressing his quest for an advantage up as some sort of campaign and Pacquiao is probably unwilling to play ball based on principle and a bad experience in the past with random testing. Of course, a cynic would say that he is unwilling to play ball because he actually is on PEDs, but as there is absolutely no evidence supporting this conclusion at the current time, it is improbable. Especially considering that the main accuser believes Pacquiao to be on a semi-mythical and superstitious placebo.
HORUS PRESENTS: WHY NoW???
Collapse
-
-
why does this ******* think he's something special and continue to bump his threads until people give a damn?Comment
-
circumstantial evidence- head got bigger just like bonds, mccgwire, etc
- increase his speed and power as he moved up in weight in a span of 2 years.
- knock out ratio went up as he went up in weigh and as he got older instead of going down
- turned down 40 million dollars, with 5 different explanations none which made sense.
- sued mayweather, but not cintron, campbell, paulie, and others
- etc.
that is just some of the circumstantial evidence that have me questioning the pacman usage of ped's.
Like i said before we do not have no evidence that he has taken ped's because he has never taken a test that could detect ped's.
Once again there is no edvidence that manny is juicing, except for circumstantial evidence. Which in any court in america if argue correctly can get you verdict of guilty.
I do not understand throwing anyway 40 millions dollars because of a random drug test.
So imo, pacquiao has done this to himself, not floyd,not me, and not others who now have questions about his career.
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
as if a asian person is incapable of getting a cut ripped body.
Racist much?
3-15-2008 vs marquez (130lbs)
10-6-2007 vs barerra 2 (130lbs)
3-19-2005 vs morales 1(130lbs)
this is at featherweight (not sure which fight i think vs mab 1 or marquez 1 either 2003 or 2004)
there is some serious racism going on in regards to pac's ascension to 1# p4p status & all that goes with it. They are all shocked at how a short asian guy was able to take punches from a welterweight.
Ask paulie malignaggi, if he couldnt beat cotto & hatton, no way in hell a asian guy does it. If he got hurt (as if he is the barometer for pain tolerance & chin resistance for non steroid use) but some short lower weight fighter didnt, its illegitimate.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Really?
is this your response to my thread about "why now".
You could not challenge yourself intellectually to combat my argument with one of your OWN??/
instead you reply with insults and name calling, spray_resistant you are real close to getting on my ignore list. for reason of not adding anything to the discussion. I at least respect JACK,DONTtashmebruh, and the other pac fans who try and debate their reasoning instead of waving the white flag and start name calling..
grow up dude.
Here is another true story for you, Floyd saw the beating Cotto received knew in his heart of hearts that he couldn't inflict anywhere near the amount of damage on such a very good and world class fighter so he found a way out without blatantly seeming like he was.
Stop the bs and accept that this is what happened, the fact that you are so obsessed with what one guy does and keep spamming the boards with nonsense always related to him proves how easily amused and dull witted you are.Comment
Comment