Shouldn’t Mayweather be applauded for wanting testing for PEDs?

[AFighter4U]

Good thing he HAD to or else we would've believed him when he said he wouldn't be able to spar for a few days after taking one.

Excuse me, but when did he EVER say he wouldn't be able to spar a few days after taking a blood test?

He said it WEAKENS HIM. Doesn't mean he can't spar.

[IMDAZED]

]You're crazy. But seriously, i think you may have confused Roach or somebody else saying that and not Manny. The man lost to morales and he felt the blood test he took 2 days before the fight had something to do with it. Do you think he suddenly forget about all of that?

Nah, it wasn't Roach (who said his own assortment of lies and contradictions). It was Manny on Brian Kenny a couple weeks ago.

the USADA....CAN.... meaning OPTIONAL meaning NOT MANDATORY meaning NOT REQUIRED. Not MUST or HAVE TO or NEED TO BE TAKEN AT THE RISK OF BEING DRAGGED TO THE STREETS AND SHOT FOR NON COMPLIANCE.

Of course it's not by force. No kidding.

Nope. That's not my position at all. Floyd jr. didn't compromise anything because he never wanted to fight Manny in the first place.

I just thought you said he did. If one party says 0 days, another party says 30 and party a says ok, 14 days then that's not a compromise?

Would you reject a FORTUNE over a useless test? Would you? [/B] Would you forgo possibly one of the biggest fights of your career over something you KNOW will ultimately have no bearing whatsoever with the result of the fight? Not unless you never wanted the fight in the first place.

You act as if the negotiations started with the 14 day compromise. It should have never gotten to this point. They both should have agreed to...what they agreed to!

Oh, so to you, a man is GUILTY until prove innocent then? That negative test result will not convince you at all that Manny is clean ?

This is not a criminal case.

[IMDAZED]

Excuse me, but when did he EVER say he wouldn't be able to spar a few days after taking a blood test?

He said it WEAKENS HIM. Doesn't mean he can't spar.

Weakens him? Try reading the latest clippings.

[AFighter4U]

Nah, it wasn't Roach (who said his own assortment of lies and contradictions). It was Manny on Brian Kenny a couple weeks ago.

You have a habit of making statements without adequate proof. Not advisable.

Of course it's not by force. No kidding.

Then why does floyd treat it as law?

I just thought you said he did. If one party says 0 days, another party says 30 and party a says ok, 14 days then that's not a compromise?

Its called bluffing. Even after i pointed it out to you based on YOUR statements/conclusion of the test being useless, you are still drinking his cool aid?

You act as if the negotiations started with the 14 day compromise. It should have never gotten to this point. They both should have agreed to...what they agreed to!

Nope. It didn't start there, but that was the turning point.

This is not a criminal case.

Oh so you mean to say it HAS to be a criminal case to believe in a persons innocence and when its not, he's AUTOMATICALLY GUILTY?

[AFighter4U]

Weakens him? Try reading the latest clippings.

Links pls. Without it, what you're saying is just hearsay.

[IMDAZED]

You have a habit of making statements without adequate proof. Not advisable.

You have a habit of talking ****. See below:

http://espn.go.com/espnradio/player?rd=1#/podcenter/?id=4841739&***********&callsign=ESPNRADIO

Then why does floyd treat it as law?

How do you treat a request as law? Explain.

Its called bluffing. Even after i pointed it out to you based on YOUR statements/conclusion of the test being useless, you are still drinking his cool aid?

What was Floyd's initial request? Try to keep that in mind.

Nope. It didn't start there, but that was the turning point.

Why do you say that?

Oh so you mean to say it HAS to be a criminal case to believe in a persons innocence and when its not, he's AUTOMATICALLY GUILTY?

No, it means I have a right to my own opinion based on the words and actions of both parties.

[sNiTcH]

You have a habit of talking ****. See below:

http://espn.go.com/espnradio/player?rd=1#/podcenter/?id=4841739&***********&callsign=ESPNRADIO

How do you treat a request as law? Explain.

What was Floyd's initial request? Try to keep that in mind.


Why do you say that?


No, it means I have a right to my own opinion based on the words and actions of both parties.

Learn to define an opinion and accusations

[IMDAZED]

Learn to define an opinion and accusations

Sure Snitch. You've been posting the same crap about some HGH urine test being developed (as if that's relevant to today) and now you want to offer advice? Learn to think.

[.PrettyBoy32.]

Sure Snitch. You've been posting the same crap about some HGH urine test being developed (as if that's relevant to today) and now you want to offer advice? Learn to think.

*******s everywhere mate, They don't think.
They listen to what they are told

[mazdaru]

imdazed,

stop wasting your time owning these fools. fighter must have been living under a rock for the last month or so b/c it seems that you have been educated him the whole time.

seems like the last time he read anything was at the start of negotiations but he comes with excuses after you present facts