Shouldn’t Mayweather be applauded for wanting testing for PEDs?
Collapse
-
-
Nah, it wasn't Roach (who said his own assortment of lies and contradictions). It was Manny on Brian Kenny a couple weeks ago.]You're crazy. But seriously, i think you may have confused Roach or somebody else saying that and not Manny. The man lost to morales and he felt the blood test he took 2 days before the fight had something to do with it. Do you think he suddenly forget about all of that?
Of course it's not by force. No kidding.the USADA....CAN.... meaning OPTIONAL meaning NOT MANDATORY meaning NOT REQUIRED. Not MUST or HAVE TO or NEED TO BE TAKEN AT THE RISK OF BEING DRAGGED TO THE STREETS AND SHOT FOR NON COMPLIANCE.
I just thought you said he did. If one party says 0 days, another party says 30 and party a says ok, 14 days then that's not a compromise?Nope. That's not my position at all. Floyd jr. didn't compromise anything because he never wanted to fight Manny in the first place.
You act as if the negotiations started with the 14 day compromise. It should have never gotten to this point. They both should have agreed to...what they agreed to!Would you reject a FORTUNE over a useless test? Would you? [/B] Would you forgo possibly one of the biggest fights of your career over something you KNOW will ultimately have no bearing whatsoever with the result of the fight? Not unless you never wanted the fight in the first place.
This is not a criminal case.Oh, so to you, a man is GUILTY until prove innocent then? That negative test result will not convince you at all that Manny is clean ?Comment
-
Comment
-
You have a habit of making statements without adequate proof. Not advisable.
Then why does floyd treat it as law?
Its called bluffing. Even after i pointed it out to you based on YOUR statements/conclusion of the test being useless, you are still drinking his cool aid?
Nope. It didn't start there, but that was the turning point.
Oh so you mean to say it HAS to be a criminal case to believe in a persons innocence and when its not, he's AUTOMATICALLY GUILTY?Comment
-
Comment
-
You have a habit of talking ****. See below:
http://espn.go.com/espnradio/player?...sign=ESPNRADIO
How do you treat a request as law? Explain.Then why does floyd treat it as law?
What was Floyd's initial request? Try to keep that in mind.Its called bluffing. Even after i pointed it out to you based on YOUR statements/conclusion of the test being useless, you are still drinking his cool aid?
Why do you say that?Nope. It didn't start there, but that was the turning point.
No, it means I have a right to my own opinion based on the words and actions of both parties.Oh so you mean to say it HAS to be a criminal case to believe in a persons innocence and when its not, he's AUTOMATICALLY GUILTY?Comment
-
You have a habit of talking ****. See below:
http://espn.go.com/espnradio/player?...sign=ESPNRADIO
How do you treat a request as law? Explain.
What was Floyd's initial request? Try to keep that in mind.
Why do you say that?
No, it means I have a right to my own opinion based on the words and actions of both parties.
Learn to define an opinion and accusationsComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
imdazed,
stop wasting your time owning these fools. fighter must have been living under a rock for the last month or so b/c it seems that you have been educated him the whole time.
seems like the last time he read anything was at the start of negotiations but he comes with excuses after you present factsComment
Comment