Which is better for Boxing? A Mayweather or Pacquiao win? Poll!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dondi33O
    Banned
    • Oct 2009
    • 1438
    • 78
    • 19
    • 1,664

    #31
    Originally posted by DrewWoodside
    Which is better for Boxing? A Mayweather or Pacquiao win? Ultimately which fighter's victory would have a more positive impact on the sport of boxing? Poll to follow, Please discuss.
    I believe a clean win by either. Meaning no robbery. The boxing game is so full of underhandedness that all we need is the true winner, "the better man" wins.
    NO ***** response, NO ******* response and no scorned Cottard response. Just a boxing fan.

    Comment

    • andrewcuff
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2008
      • 1790
      • 83
      • 57
      • 2,078

      #32
      Originally posted by Dondi33O
      I believe a clean win by either. Meaning no robbery. The boxing game is so full of underhandedness that all we need is the true winner, "the better man" wins.
      NO ***** response, NO ******* response and no scorned Cottard response. Just a boxing fan.
      An excellent point.

      Comment

      • Joeyzagz
        Soir
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2006
        • 6253
        • 569
        • 567
        • 16,120

        #33
        IF you really love Pac you need to root for him to lose.

        No way he ends his career on a loss, and may even move up to snatch an unprecedented 8th title at 154. Or move down to 140 and fight Bradley.

        Mayweather win is best for boxing.

        Comment

        • COACH WEBB
          R.I.P. Jimmy!!
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 5033
          • 223
          • 98
          • 11,318

          #34
          Originally posted by whirlwind
          Pacquiao win is good for boxing as Mayweather not setting a good example to our children.
          you have to be kidding..I mean it crazy how Pac is setting a great example for our children, but the man cheated on his wife.

          ya'll need to call a spade a spade and I don't like to get into ppl's personal lives but don't have these double standards when discussing these two fighters as being role models and all that. Real talk.

          Comment

          • DrewWoodside
            Lifestyle..Regular!
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2008
            • 9244
            • 317
            • 590
            • 16,453

            #35
            We have to also take into consideration the fact that Pacquiao had just come from lightweight when he fought Hatton, and DLH.

            Comment

            • COACH WEBB
              R.I.P. Jimmy!!
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 5033
              • 223
              • 98
              • 11,318

              #36
              Originally posted by andrewcuff
              Pacquiao:

              Cotto
              Hatton
              De La Hoya
              Diaz
              Marquez


              Mayweather:

              Hatton
              De La Hoya
              Baldomir
              Judah
              Mitchell
              Gatti
              Bruseles
              Corley
              Corley and Bruseles were not during his reign as P4P reign..he became P4P when Hop lost to Taylor the first time.

              So Hatton-undefeated Champ at 140, that wanted to take Floyd's belt at 147
              DLH- 154 Lb Champ
              Baldo- 147 lb Lineal Champ although he had a bunch of losses
              Judah- former 147 champ, lost his title to Baldo, but a largely demanded fight between the two
              Gatti- 140 lb Wbc champ
              Mitchell- southpaw at first fight at welter

              Manny
              Hatton- 140 LB Champ
              DLH- 154 Lb Champ that hadn't fought at 47 in YEARS
              Cotto- 147 lb WBO Champ that Manny fought at 145
              Diaz- 135 Wbc Champ, although some say he was the not the best belt helder at 135
              JMM- highly controversial fight

              NOW, they are fighting each other.

              there is NOTHING to complain about as a fan of boxing REGARDLESS of who your favorite fighter is.

              Comment

              • DrewWoodside
                Lifestyle..Regular!
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2008
                • 9244
                • 317
                • 590
                • 16,453

                #37
                Originally posted by COACH WEBB
                you have to be kidding..I mean it crazy how Pac is setting a great example for our children, but the man cheated on his wife.

                ya'll need to call a spade a spade and I don't like to get into ppl's personal lives but don't have these double standards when discussing these two fighters as being role models and all that. Real talk.
                I would pick Pacquiao as the better role model despite rumors of an affair.. however I don't think their abilities to be role models for children plays very heavily into what is better for boxing.

                Comment

                • COACH WEBB
                  R.I.P. Jimmy!!
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 5033
                  • 223
                  • 98
                  • 11,318

                  #38
                  Originally posted by DrewWoodside
                  I would pick Pacquiao as the better role model despite rumors of an affair.. however I don't think their abilities to be role models for children plays very heavily into what is better for boxing.
                  rumors of an affair...its public knowledge my friend.

                  I mean, we ought to forgive others for the mistakes they make and I'm all for that, but for ppl to only pick and choose what they will knock ppl for and what they choose to sweep under the rug, I can't ride with that. keep it 100 is how I feel. if one thing is wrong for this person, then another thing is wrong for that person.

                  The reality of the matter is that they are BOTH role models to some kids. All athletes are rather they believe it or not.

                  Comment

                  • rsheker
                    Up and Comer
                    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 87
                    • 8
                    • 0
                    • 6,130

                    #39
                    Originally posted by COACH WEBB
                    I kinda of think that it goes to show that no matter who Floyd fights, he will always been looked at as not taking risks...but I mean, he is about to fight Pac right now but I guess that is not good enough for some ppl.
                    how can Pac be a risk, he is a one dimensional fighter and is on steroids, the olympic style testing will take mannys power come fight night, so it'll be a walk in the park of mayweather, no?
                    i thought this was an easy fight as mayweather claims....

                    Comment

                    • dans
                      Journeyman
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jun 2006
                      • 6835
                      • 212
                      • 134
                      • 13,712

                      #40
                      Originally posted by DrewWoodside
                      Which is better for Boxing? A Mayweather or Pacquiao win? Ultimately which fighter's victory would have a more positive impact on the sport of boxing? Poll to follow, Please discuss.
                      Good question. Gotta be a Pac win because it sets up a rematch.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP