Which is better for Boxing? A Mayweather or Pacquiao win? Poll!

[Batman-p4p]

lol






I can't wait til pac get's outboxed AGAIN !!! Marquez was'nt enuff huh ???

[Batman-p4p]

..

Marquez almost knocked his ****in head off lol

[one-Punch]

Mayweather win is better. I could see Pac retiring if he were to beat Mayweather.

What do you see Mayweather doing? Looking for more fights if he beats Pac? ****, Win or Loose, Mayweather is retiring... So your logic is flawed... Pac, Win or Loose, I still see him possibly fighting...

[RightCross94]

How about a good fight?

[DrewWoodside]

How about a good fight?

A good fight being better for boxing than a bad fight is a given.. I have no idea why anyone would bother posting such a redundant reply. It has nothing to do with the thread.

[dans]

A good fight being better for boxing than a bad fight is a given.. I have no idea why anyone would bother posting such a redundant reply. It has nothing to do with the thread.

I would say a competitive fight is also good for boxing. lol

[Guest]

I don't know how old you are, but it used to be, especially in the 70s and 80s (can't attest before that) and it's coming back mostly due to Pacquiao. **** I remember seeing Hagler, Hearns and Leonard in all kinds of TV commercials.

I remember of course. I am ancient.
Do you remember when it stopped being on regular television?

The funny thing that people don't realize is that ppv has been around for over 30 years. It wasn't like you could watch Hagler-Hearns on regular tv.
CBS did interview those games during other sports at halftime and such, etc so it was noticed in the mainstream but you couldn't watch it on regular tv.
Good ole closed circuit, lol.

But yeah, it was more popular in the 70's and 80's, but it's not even close to mainstream.

Imagine if the super bowl did 3 million instead of 100 million. I mean for any football game or baseball game, that would be a colossal failure.

[Chups]

Pacquiao.........