Comments Thread For: Terence Crawford ticketed, held at gunpoint by Omaha police hours after his parade

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Smash
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Nov 2008
    • 15312
    • 6,321
    • 7,722
    • 21,172

    #201
    i still dont really understand why reports say the gun was on the drivers side floor

    i mean i u are a cop and its dark and u shine a light in and it falls on a gun on the floor

    u might go hhhhmm oh hold on a sec and react

    just giving all possible sides to this

    Comment

    • ShoulderRoll
      Join The Great Resist
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 56041
      • 10,079
      • 5,027
      • 763,445

      #202
      Originally posted by The Big Dunn

      Why would I do that?

      You are dishonestly trying to make my issue with just the stop.

      I have made it clear my primary issue is with the handcuffing on the curb because neither allegedly reckless driving or the gun, because they are in Nebraska, warrants it.

      That you keep trying to shift from this is very telling.
      If you stop someone in the middle of the night for driving recklessly and there’s a firearm in the vehicle you secure the scene to find out what’s what. You don’t know if the reckless driver is impaired in some way and might do something else erratic, except with the firearm this time.

      There’s nothing unreasonable about that. Not every little inconvenience to a black person has to be racism.

      Comment

      • fistandfury
        Contender
        • Nov 2011
        • 213
        • 132
        • 40
        • 8,668

        #203
        Originally posted by LEONIDAS26@
        Incredibly IGNORANT comment that has small minded fanboy syndrome written all over it.
        Canelo a drug cheat and cherry picking coward an ambassador for boxing ??
        You guys really can’t give up the ghost can you?
        Canelo was never arrested riding hot with fellas from the block, hence, Canelo is worth $500 million, you see that happening for Crawford?

        Comment

        • champion4ever
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2007
          • 23723
          • 4,031
          • 6,987
          • 202,915,785

          #204
          Originally posted by SUBZER0ED

          We definitely need all of the facts before we can make an informed judgement, Champ. Until then, all we can do is speculate.
          Say, what did you think about Bud Crawford’s performance against Canelo? I thought he looked just superb.

          Also, what happened to Canelo? This has to have been his worse performance of his career. To me he looked both old and slow.

          He looked as if he has aged some 15 years more in boxing years than Terence Crawford who is more than three years older than him.

          I know he is only 35 but he looked 50 years old in there against Bud. In addition, Canelo looked like a defeated and broken fighter who wanted to quit.

          Now they come up with the elbow excuse. However, It doesn’t matter. Terence is just the better fighter.

          Comment

          • champion4ever
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2007
            • 23723
            • 4,031
            • 6,987
            • 202,915,785

            #205
            What makes this charge even more incredible against Crawford is that he had three additional passengers in the car with him at the time. His coach, his security detail and Coach Malachi’s lady friend.

            Now a reasonable person should ask themselves. Why and how is it even possible for a clean and sober Bud Crawford to jeopardize and risk the lives of others by driving erratically and recklessly?

            If he was driving alone then it would sound more plausible. In addition, Crawford requested to see the radar where he was speeding too but was denied. I am sorry but something is just not adding up.

            I may be wrong. However, at least to me; It seems they were out to either get or frame Terence Crawford for a crime he did not commit that night.

            Comment

            • The Big Dunn
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2009
              • 69667
              • 9,687
              • 8,001
              • 287,568

              #206
              Originally posted by ShoulderRoll

              If you stop someone in the middle of the night for driving recklessly and there’s a firearm in the vehicle you secure the scene to find out what’s what. You don’t know if the reckless driver is impaired in some way and might do something else erratic, except with the firearm this time.

              There’s nothing unreasonable about that. Not every little inconvenience to a black person has to be racism.
              The scene was secure. You’re being repetitive just to argue. Crawford and his security did as required by Nebraska law- they informed the cops they had firearms.

              They did know as no field sobriety test was issued. That means they didn’t think he was under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

              The handcuffing is unreasonable.

              Little inconvenience is what you call violation of rights when it’s black people. Very telling.

              Comment

              • Smash
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Nov 2008
                • 15312
                • 6,321
                • 7,722
                • 21,172

                #207
                Originally posted by champion4ever
                What makes this charge even more incredible against Crawford is that he had three additional passengers in the car with him at the time. His coach, his security detail and Coach Malachi’s lady friend.

                Now a reasonable person should ask themselves. Why and how is it even possible for a clean and sober Bud Crawford to jeopardize and risk the lives of others by driving erratically and recklessly?
                .
                yes that seems unlikely he would have been driving very badly in that situation, what the reason was he came to the attention of this cop car in the first place u would think was small if anything at all

                now add to this is the fact the cop actually issued a citation, even tho at this stage he knew it was bud crawford who had asked to escalate this further & yet the cop still issued a citation, that is also strange to me, if this is a rogue cop he is landing himself in hot water with this if he has no evidence of reckless driving and its bud and hes complaining, thats a bad mix & hard to understand as well

                Comment

                • ShoulderRoll
                  Join The Great Resist
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 56041
                  • 10,079
                  • 5,027
                  • 763,445

                  #208
                  Originally posted by The Big Dunn
                  They did know as no field sobriety test was issued. That means they didn’t think he was under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
                  Right, AFTER securing the scene they didn’t think Crawford was on drugs or alcohol.

                  But there was no way to know that beforehand going into the traffic stop.

                  This isn’t that hard to understand.

                  Comment

                  • The Big Dunn
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 69667
                    • 9,687
                    • 8,001
                    • 287,568

                    #209
                    Originally posted by ShoulderRoll

                    Right, AFTER securing the scene they didn’t think Crawford was on drugs or alcohol.

                    But there was no way to know that beforehand going into the traffic stop.

                    This isn’t that hard to understand.
                    No they didn’t think it immediately based on the way he responded to their questions. No slurring of speech. No visible signs of drug or alcohol use.

                    Shoulder please stop. You are just desperately throwing things out you know aren’t true.

                    No it isn’t hard to understand. There was no need for handcuffing like they were. Crawford and his passengers did what the Nebraska law required.

                    They weren’t rude. There wasn’t the smell of alcohol or drugs.

                    What you still haven’t answered- why not just tell us he was running lights and stop signs? That they didn’t just say this is very fishy.

                    Comment

                    • ShoulderRoll
                      Join The Great Resist
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 56041
                      • 10,079
                      • 5,027
                      • 763,445

                      #210
                      Originally posted by The Big Dunn

                      No they didn’t think it immediately based on the way he responded to their questions. No slurring of speech. No visible signs of drug or alcohol use.
                      .
                      And how do you know they knew it immediately, Dunn? Where are you getting so many details on the traffic stop?

                      You can’t just make things up to support your idea that this was a racist cop.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP