That is heavily based on the quality of the era itself more than the quality of those specific fighters though. I dont buy for one second that Fury, AJ and Dubois are any better than the best guys Tyson beat, they're just competing in a worse era and one where the UK is the main media power at HW.
I'm not convinced it's a worse era. But the fact is that AJ and Fury will be well regarded for their achievements across a decade+.
What would be Tyson's equivalent rivals? Holyfield, Bowe and Lewis? He fought 2 of them and lost 3 times, once in disgrace.
Mike Tyson is one of the most favorite boxing icons America ever produced and marketed. His image and highlight reels have went around the world atleast 10 million times. His resume is weak but nobody here will agree with you because he was marketed so heavy and is so well liked. Welcome to boxingscene and the boxing community. You do have merit for your claims but this isnt the place to hear non bias feedback.
Some m0therfuc5ers are always trying to ice-skate uphill - Blade
Holmes (after a 2 year vaca)
Spinks (clearly in cash-out mode)
Holy ( )
Lenny ( )
That's about it
Your opinion, that's what it is. You leaving other prime fighters out. Eight fights a HW and he's the greatest because he beat a quitter (that knocked him out in one fight) a fat gypsy that had one foot out of the ring and a scared black man that got knocked out by a 5', 300 pounds Mexican. Boy you got no argument.
Comment