The lineal HW title. A fart in the wind.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kafkod
    I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2013
    • 24800
    • 2,184
    • 1,803
    • 405,373

    #1

    The lineal HW title. A fart in the wind.

    What happened to the fabled, all important, lineal HW title after Usyk beat Fury?

    Fury was introduced as the former lineal champ for the rematch. But Usyk, interestingly, wasn't introduced as the reigning lineal champ.

    He wasn't introduced as lineal champion for his unification fight with Dubois either. In fact, there wasn't a peep from anybody about the all important lineal title at any time during the build up to that fight.

    So what happened to the fabled lineal - "the only title that really matters" - during Usyk vs Dubois 2?

    billeau2 Coverdale Willie Pep 229 JAB5239 Willow The Wisp

    Can any of you guys tell me?
    Last edited by kafkod; 07-24-2025, 08:16 PM.
  • famicommander
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2018
    • 10194
    • 5,565
    • 1
    • 49,546

    #2
    Usyk is still the champion.

    If he throws the WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO, IBO, and Ring belts in the garbage tomorrow but then continues fighting, he'll still be the real world champion. Until he loses or retires, he's the world champion no matter which belts he does or doesn't carry around or how the ring announcer wants to introduce him.

    Comment

    • TheIronMike
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2018
      • 4176
      • 1,264
      • 779
      • 17,589

      #3
      Lineal is only important when the champ is stripped of his titles.

      Comment

      • Coverdale
        Email champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2025
        • 1136
        • 523
        • 749
        • 0

        #4
        Originally posted by kafkod
        What happened to the fabled, all important, lineal HW title after Usyk beat Fury?

        Fury was introduced as the former lineal champ for the rematch. But Usyk, interestingly, wasn't introduced as the reigning lineal champ.

        He wasn't introduced as lineal champion for his unification fight with Dubois either. In fact, there wasn't a peep from anybody about the all important lineal title at any time during the build up to that fight.

        So what happened to the fabled lineal - "the only title that really matters" - during Usyk vs Dubois 2?

        billeau2 Coverdale Willie Pep 229 JAB5239 Willow The Wisp

        Can any of you guys tell me?
        This is primarily because the media which presents boxing to us is ignorant. DAZN's Kate Scott told us Jack Dempsey was "one of the first to unify the division" when presenting a historical overview of the heavyweight division.

        The adjective lineal is unimportant, it's really just a descriptor to distinguish "the heavyweight championship" from sanctioning body titlists. Usyk is the world heavyweight champion.

        Given the authority you bestow upon the sanctioning bodies, you presumably don't recognise Usyk as "undisputed" given the WBC, WBA and WBO each have secondary titlists (two in the WBA's case!) calling themselves "world" champion?

        Comment

        • M312
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2021
          • 2341
          • 1,007
          • 250
          • 0

          #5
          I mean, Fury was never a true lineal champion anyway, because Wladimir wasn't.

          Wladimir never unified the titles or beat his brother, who most agree would've beaten him easily.

          It's just a marketing ploy that Usyk doesn't need to use.

          Comment

          • famicommander
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2018
            • 10194
            • 5,565
            • 1
            • 49,546

            #6
            Originally posted by M312
            I mean, Fury was never a true lineal champion anyway, because Wladimir wasn't.

            Wladimir never unified the titles or beat his brother, who most agree would've beaten him easily.

            It's just a marketing ploy that Usyk doesn't need to use.
            Wlad never unified? What on earth are you talking about?

            February 23, 2008: IBF/IBO champion Wladimir Klitschko UD 12 over WBO champion Sultan Ibragimov
            June 20, 2009: WBO/IBF/IBO champion Wladimir Klitschko RTD 9 over Ruslan Chagaev for the vacant Ring belt
            July 2, 2011: Ring/WBO/IBF/IBO champion Wladimir Klitschko UD 12 over WBA champion David Haye
            October 5, 2013: Ring/WBA/WBO/IBF/IBO champion Wladimir Klitschko UD 12 over Alexander Povetkin for the vacant TBRB world title

            Vitali was already out of the picture by the time Wlad fought Povetkin. So if you don't recognize his lineal claim from the Chagaev or ibragimov wins, why not for the Povetkin win?

            Comment

            • M312
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2021
              • 2341
              • 1,007
              • 250
              • 0

              #7
              Originally posted by famicommander

              Wlad never unified? What on earth are you talking about?

              February 23, 2008: IBF/IBO champion Wladimir Klitschko UD 12 over WBO champion Sultan Ibragimov
              June 20, 2009: WBO/IBF/IBO champion Wladimir Klitschko RTD 9 over Ruslan Chagaev for the vacant Ring belt
              July 2, 2011: Ring/WBO/IBF/IBO champion Wladimir Klitschko UD 12 over WBA champion David Haye
              October 5, 2013: Ring/WBA/WBO/IBF/IBO champion Wladimir Klitschko UD 12 over Alexander Povetkin for the vacant TBRB world title

              Vitali was already out of the picture by the time Wlad fought Povetkin. So if you don't recognize his lineal claim from the Chagaev or ibragimov wins, why not for the Povetkin win?
              Its not that I don't recognise the claim, it's that he was never fully unified. That's just fact.

              He wasn't even the best, his brother was.

              It was just a marketing ploy as 'he would never face his brother'. That's fine, but that doesn't make you default lineal, especially when your brother wipes the floor with you.

              Just got to accept that there was no lineal champion.


              Also, Vitali was still WBC champion when Wladimir faced Povetkin btw
              Last edited by M312; 07-25-2025, 03:33 AM.

              Comment

              • kafkod
                I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2013
                • 24800
                • 2,184
                • 1,803
                • 405,373

                #8
                Originally posted by famicommander
                Usyk is still the champion.

                If he throws the WBA, WBC, IBF, WBO, IBO, and Ring belts in the garbage tomorrow but then continues fighting, he'll still be the real world champion. Until he loses or retires, he's the world champion no matter which belts he does or doesn't carry around or how the ring announcer wants to introduce him.
                If he carried on fighting and beating legit contenders without his belts he would be recognised as the best HW in the world and the de facto world HW champion.

                But that would have nothing to do with any fictitious, non-existent lineal title and everything to with the fact that he beat all the top contenders, won all the recognised title belts, and was still undefeated.

                Comment

                • kafkod
                  I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2013
                  • 24800
                  • 2,184
                  • 1,803
                  • 405,373

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Coverdale

                  This is primarily because the media which presents boxing to us is ignorant. DAZN's Kate Scott told us Jack Dempsey was "one of the first to unify the division" when presenting a historical overview of the heavyweight division.

                  The adjective lineal is unimportant, it's really just a descriptor to distinguish "the heavyweight championship" from sanctioning body titlists. Usyk is the world heavyweight champion.

                  Given the authority you bestow upon the sanctioning bodies, you presumably don't recognise Usyk as "undisputed" given the WBC, WBA and WBO each have secondary titlists (two in the WBA's case!) calling themselves "world" champion?
                  It wasn't the media who proclaimed Tyson Fury as lineal champion, it was Fury and his influential backers.

                  I don't bestow any authority on anybody. Who the fuck to you think I am, King of the world?

                  I'm just a boxing fan with enough common sense to understand how secondary world titles stand in relation to actual world titles.
                  Last edited by kafkod; 07-25-2025, 09:16 AM.

                  Comment

                  • The Big Dunn
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 69627
                    • 9,673
                    • 7,987
                    • 287,568

                    #10
                    Originally posted by kafkod
                    What happened to the fabled, all important, lineal HW title after Usyk beat Fury?

                    Fury was introduced as the former lineal champ for the rematch. But Usyk, interestingly, wasn't introduced as the reigning lineal champ.

                    He wasn't introduced as lineal champion for his unification fight with Dubois either. In fact, there wasn't a peep from anybody about the all important lineal title at any time during the build up to that fight.

                    So what happened to the fabled lineal - "the only title that really matters" - during Usyk vs Dubois 2?

                    billeau2 Coverdale Willie Pep 229 JAB5239 Willow The Wisp

                    Can any of you guys tell me?
                    I always thought espn just kept using that to hype Fury and the fight and never really cared about it.

                    But you’re right, suddenly it doesn’t get mentioned anymore.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP