Originally posted by BoxOfficer
View Post
But a DQ would be a correct ruling and nobody can complain about what might have been. What they will look at is the relative actions of all involved, and who can be called responsible for the actions leading up to the event. I believe it would look something like this: Tank originally takes a knee, this means the ref should have penalized him, deducted him... At that point was Tank's foul egregious enough? Because then the ref steps in and enables him...
So, was Tank the primary means of the DQ, or was it the ref that enabled him? This will be a sticky point because usually when a ref is negligent this is not enough to overturn a fight. The fighter has to be at least somewhat responsible for causing the problem.
Comment