Warren: Fury will not defend the WBC title next

[WBC WBA IBF]

What kind of champ would bother to fight some random without defending the belt? Just pointless. Pathetic.

He may not be able to defend the WBC title until the arbitration is settled.

[M312]

Fury will be putting his ring/lineal title on the line.

Lineal... Ffs, some people make it hard to be a Tyson fan.

He just needs to fight the best and 'fans' need to stop making excuses for him.

It's not hard.

[removed]

Lineal... Ffs, some people make it hard to be a Tyson fan.

He just needs to fight the best and 'fans' need to stop making excuses for him.

It's not hard.

You need to understand how business works. This is the real world.

If Whyte wasn't so greedy, this fight would be happening.

Fury will probably fight Ruiz or Joyce instead, both of whom are better boxers than Whyte anyway.

[M312]

You need to understand how business works. This is the real world.

If Whyte wasn't so greedy, this fight would be happening.

Fury will probably fight Ruiz or Joyce instead, both of whom are better boxers than Whyte anyway.

Just be a boxing fan, not a fake accountant.

[removed]

Just be a boxing fan, not a fake accountant.

Just as Hearn made out Wilder's & Fury's arbitration wasn't their problem, Whyte's arbitration isn't Fury's, this could go on for months and months.

[JakeTheBoxer]

Can you casuals explain to me, how is Fury -Joyce not bigger fight than Fury -Whyte? Joyce was never knocked out, by anybody.

[kafkod]

You are confused about the timeline. Fury vs Schwarz was announced months before the WBC ordered Fury vs Whyte and Whyte vs Rivas was announced weeks before the order. The Fury vs Whyte order was for them to fight after their already announced fights against Schwarz and Rivas.

Fury's public response to the order was that he would accept if the diamond title was at stake instead of the interim title, unaware of the fact that the WBC was planning to eliminate the diamond title and replace it with the franchise title. Fury ultimately accepted the fight for the interim title.

On the other hand, the WBC publicly confirmed that Whyte refused to fight Fury and filed a petition to be named mandatory without having to fight a final eliminator. Those are the facts. So stop lying and saying Fury turned down the Whyte fight when the WBC says you are wrong and that Whyte is the one that turned down the fight.

I'm not lying, you are, as usual. The link you posted was to statement by Sulaiman made before the events I'm talking about. and in any case Sulaiman is as big a liar as you are. Which figures, as you do nothing at this forum except lie on his behalf.

[kafkod]

You absolutely are worried about it. That's what you keep talking about.

Boxing fans should just want the best fights, not whether a boxer gets 10% or 20%, it literally has zero baring on you.

Pesters me with ****** crap about Whyte and Fury's purses, then tells me not to talk about boxer's wages when I respond .....

[kafkod]

Can you casuals explain to me, how is Fury -Joyce not bigger fight than Fury -Whyte? Joyce was never knocked out, by anybody.

Both would be equally massive fights in the UK because of Fury's popularity/notoriety.

But Joyce's unbeaten record and huge, imposing physique, set alongside Whyte's recent devastating KO defeat to Povetkin, would likely make Fury vs Joyce a bigger fight outside the UK, especially in the US.

[M312]

Pesters me with ****** crap about Whyte and Fury's purses, then tells me not to talk about boxer's wages when I respond .....

The only thing I've said is that anyone saying 20% is OK is just a troll.

Just be sensible and support BOXING. Don't justify the BS.