The link I posted literally has a statement from the WBC saying Whyte didn't accept the fight and petitioned to not have to fight Fury. So no, it doesn't prove I'm lying. It literally proves the opposite of what you're saying. We both know you're a troll, so you don't care about truth or logic. But by pushing this issue with me, you're exposing yourself to new posters who may not have known yet that you're a troll account. Now they know.
Nobody is entitled to be named mandatory without fighting a final eliminator.
So he refused to fight Fury and got away with it. Which is fine. Just don't lie and say he didn't refuse to fight Fury.
Public statements don't mean anything if you privately turn down a fight and file a petition to block the fight.
Whyte's petition was to uphold what he believed was his legal right to be named mandatory challenger without having to fight a final eliminator.
He backed that petition up with the threat of legal action and the WBC compromised by sanctioning his upcoming fight with Rivas - which he had already signed for - as a final eliminator.
After that statement by Sulaiman, Whyte publicly accepted a challenge from Fury to fight him for the WBC Diamond belt, but Fury changed his mind and said that he had no interest in fighting Whyte.
Comment