Is 20% for Dillian Shyte fair given his market value?

[WBC WBA IBF]

That doesn’t even make sense because Fury isn’t a challenger .

So you admit you posted old rules no longer listed in the WBC rules section and tried to trick everyone?

I know reading isn't your strength, so I'll help you out.

In its sole discretion, the WBC shall subsequently determine the timing and terms of any bout between a Champion [TYSON FURY] and Interim Champion [DILLIAN WHYTE] to determine a sole champion in the division, provided, however, that an Interim Champion [DILLIAN WHYTE] shall never be deemed a mandatory challenger, ***or entitled to greater share of proceeds of any purse offer beyond that of a challenger***, without a specific prior written order to that effect from the WBC President or his designee.

So the WBC rules are very clear that Dillian Whyte isn't entitled to a greater split than 30% unless it is specifically ordered. So you were lying when you said he was entitled to 45%. Being interim champion doesn't entitle Whyte to a greater split than usual. You were wrong. You lied.

Why are they in arbitration if it’s up to the WBC to determine the splits. ? You’re lying again .

Because if you have a grievance against the WBC, it must be decided in arbitration. How much do you want to bet Whyte won't be awarded 45% by the arbiter?

[WBC WBA IBF]

The WBC rules clearly say 45% for interim in a purse split, "no different than any other mandatory" though.

http://www.wbcboxing.com/downloads/N...FINAL_2009.pdf

You just make up **** and expect everyone to believe it.

Just a reminder that Robbie Barrett purposely posted 14 year old rules that no longer appear on the WBC rules site to try to trick everybody. The current version of the WBC rules and regulations make it very clear that interim champions aren't entitle to more of the purse split than a regular mandatory. So Robbie posted an old version of the rules to try to fool you guys. Shows you what kind of person Robbie Barrett is.

[REDEEMER]

Just a reminder that Robbie Barrett purposely posted 14 year old rules that no longer appear on the WBC rules site to try to trick everybody. The current version of the WBC rules and regulations make it very clear that interim champions aren't entitle to more of the purse split than a regular mandatory. So Robbie posted an old version of the rules to try to fool you guys. Shows you what kind of person Robbie Barrett is.

If he’s purposely posting false info like you do on here why is Hearn stating the same splits himself and the WBC hasn’t corrected him on it if it’s old news ? For your sake you better hope Whyte doesn’t get near 45% because you will look like a very big idiot more then usual . Is Hearn publicly stating false things himself knowing people can look things up or maybe he thought the same thing which again is not clarified ?

Here’s a much better question you will probably swerve again , why are they negotiating from 45% down to 20% if what you state is real if it’s old news ?

[WBC WBA IBF]

why is Hearn stating the same splits himself and the WBC hasn’t corrected him on it if it’s old news ?

Because Hearn is a pathological liar and is too ****** to keep his mouth shut about pending legal matters. The current WBC rules and regulations, which have been in effect since at least 2011, clearly state interim champions aren't entitled to a higher split than normal challengers.

Do you deny that you posted old rules that don't appear in the rules section of the WBC website?

[REDEEMER]

Because Hearn is a pathological liar and is too ****** to keep his mouth shut about pending legal matters. The current WBC rules and regulations, which have been in effect since at least 2011, clearly state interim champions aren't entitled to a higher split than normal challengers.

Do you deny that you posted old rules that don't appear in the rules section of the WBC website?

So why are they negotiating from 45% down to 20% ? That is what’s going on right in arbitration ? Why is there an arbitration if 45% doesn’t exist currently ? Why hasn’t the WBC come out and say Hearn is lying and keep the rules up and running that say 45% ? Can you answer even one of these ? Because if no 45. % is possible there wouldn’t be any arbitration about splits to what that rule is right ?

If you work for the WBC you can answer these right ?

[REDEEMER]

WBC WBA IBF Yea that’s what I thought

[champion4ever]

I agree that 20 percent of the purse split is way too low for Dillian Whyte but at the same time he is not worth 45 percent either.

[Toffee]

The WBC rules clearly state that the interim champion is to be given no special treatment in regards to purse split and is considered no different than any other mandatory when it comes to the purse split.

No special treatment. So 30% right?

No, that's not clear. That's your uneducated inexperienced amateur biased fanboy opinion. A normal no name champion is entitled to 70%. Fury makes $25 million a fight, Whyte makes less than $1 million a fight, and adjusting the split to 80/20 is absolutely appropriate.

When Fury was the mandatory and fought Klitschko, the split was modified the same way. 80/20 in Klitschko's favor. This kind of stuff goes on all the time.

Look at it the other way. Whyte isn't a nobody. He's headlined PPVs.

He's worthy of the minimum split. If he isn't, who is? When you move a level up from Whyte you start talking about exceptional challengers.

And Fury doesn't make $25M a fight. He makes that when fighting Deontay Wilder. That's beyond his base purse too.

The WBC rules say Whyte gets 30% as a minimum. They even limit what they can do in exceptional circumstances (40, 45, 50). Can you at least acknowledge that?

[REDEEMER]

No special treatment. So 30% right?



Look at it the other way. Whyte isn't a nobody. He's headlined PPVs.

He's worthy of the minimum split. If he isn't, who is? When you move a level up from Whyte you start talking about exceptional challengers.

And Fury doesn't make $25M a fight. He makes that when fighting Deontay Wilder. That's beyond his base purse too.

The WBC rules say Whyte gets 30% as a minimum. They even limit what they can do in exceptional circumstances (40, 45, 50). Can you at least acknowledge that?

And that’s the funny thing an interim Champion isn’t going to get 20% low balling according to the WBC rules . I ran that pretender off the thread he’s got no answers ,right now I’m guessing he’s scrambling on the internet to come up with more jargon to misconstrue things .

You read my questions to him right ? That’s why he disappeared when normally he’s right there having to retaliate because that’s why he’s on here and now I still don’t believe him being involved with the WBC because he’s incompetent he’s the worst liar on here because he makes himself believe the things he says on here ,the forum is even worse letting a paid shill on here .

[Oracle01]

If he made half a million in his last fight and Fury made 25 million in his last fight, why would Whyte be worth more than 20%?

Their opponents and context were different so to compare them directly is idiotic. Whyte is a big name and fight for Fury especially in the UK. To anyone that knows boxing , a 20% offer is pure ducking money.