The Wbc lists the franchise champ as higher than the world champ in their rankings, shouldn't that be enough for them to be considered the same thing as a so called"super champ" like Bud or the Wba super champs?
So how is Buds belt different from Wbc franchise champ that was started as a way for Wbc to let the best fight the best( possibly in different divisions even) while the #1 contender doesn't cry about it & can't sue because they are then gifted a world champ belt instead. (So iow it has same special privileges Wbo provides Bud,for same reason because he has won multiple titles)
The Super champ designation allows Bud to avoid mandatories every 9 mos as required by" world" champs like Andrade. (up to several yrs) the Wba also has World champs & super champs.
The franchise belt Canelo was given still shows him being ranked above Charlo at mw to this day,& despite Canelo Undisputed smw he still isn't listed as franchise champ at smw, implying he doesn't take the belt with him to every division he fights in, just like only some divisions have super champs.
So how is Buds belt different from Wbc franchise champ that was started as a way for Wbc to let the best fight the best( possibly in different divisions even) while the #1 contender doesn't cry about it & can't sue because they are then gifted a world champ belt instead. (So iow it has same special privileges Wbo provides Bud,for same reason because he has won multiple titles)
The Super champ designation allows Bud to avoid mandatories every 9 mos as required by" world" champs like Andrade. (up to several yrs) the Wba also has World champs & super champs.
The franchise belt Canelo was given still shows him being ranked above Charlo at mw to this day,& despite Canelo Undisputed smw he still isn't listed as franchise champ at smw, implying he doesn't take the belt with him to every division he fights in, just like only some divisions have super champs.
Comment