Comments Thread For: Haney On WBC Lightweight Title Confusion: They Can Say What They Want To Say, It's Still Disputed
Collapse
-
-
You don't get to invent your own definition of undisputed champion. Every recognized boxing organization agrees that Kambosos is the world champion, therefore he is the undisputed world champion. The WBC, WBA, IBF and WBO all agree he is the champion. There is no dispute. Haney's belt is the same as Tank's belt, a second tier title.Comment
-
Comment
-
I haven't kept up with the franchise title at all, last I'd heard it wasn't transferable, i hadn't even realised that Lopez had become franchise.
Is Canelo still franchise champ at 160? If so does that mean Charlo's belt at 160 (in the eyes of the WBC) can't be officially unified with another middleweight title, and wouldn't count as part of an undisputed reign either?Comment
-
So I see a lot of people saying that Kambosos, and Lopez before him are undisputed because their , the man that beat the man. Your getting that confused with lineal. Both Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather were multiple division lineal champs. Yet neither ever became undisputed in their careers.Comment
-
I haven't kept up with the franchise title at all, last I'd heard it wasn't transferable, i hadn't even realised that Lopez had become franchise.
Is Canelo still franchise champ at 160? If so does that mean Charlo's belt at 160 (in the eyes of the WBC) can't be officially unified with another middleweight title, and wouldn't count as part of an undisputed reign either?
Comment
-
-
I know Australian casuals want to jump to Kabanossi being the new sugar Ray Robinson but I'm afraid it's just no so.Comment
-
I haven't kept up with the franchise title at all, last I'd heard it wasn't transferable, i hadn't even realised that Lopez had become franchise.
Is Canelo still franchise champ at 160? If so does that mean Charlo's belt at 160 (in the eyes of the WBC) can't be officially unified with another middleweight title, and wouldn't count as part of an undisputed reign either?
Basically, he said Canelo just represents the WBC now.
It's not a real title.
The WBC did make it specially transferrable for the Loma/Te'o fight, because it was a special fight. How it became on the line now is nonsense. They charging sanctioning fees now... But no mandatories. Drop that crap.
noComment
Comment