Comments Thread For: Haney On WBC Lightweight Title Confusion: They Can Say What They Want To Say, It's Still Disputed

[WBC WBA IBF]

The franchise champion is a nice way of saying I got stripped of my title for ducking my mandatory. Starting with canelo and charlo. Then loma and Haney. Anyone who supports that shenanigans is a clown and is everything what’s wrong with the sport of boxing

The Franchise world championship is no different than the Super world championship. Both need to go away. But acknowledging the simple fact that Kambosos is undisputed champion doesn't mean any of us support any of this. You're not entitled to your own set of facts just because you're not happy with the reality of a situation.

[Toffee]

You're wrong. The rules document on the WBC's website is only updated once every couple years and hasn't been updated since the changes to the Franchise world championship.




They didn't go against anything. They changed the rule.




Teofimo provided the answers when he publicly showed his certifications proving his fight vs. Lomachenko was sanctioned by the WBC as a world championship fight for the Franchise version of the WBC world championship.

FFS, the rules are there. You're now claiming that the rules documents don't match your version of them because they haven't got around to updating them? Is this some kind of joke?

Yes, Loma v Lopez was sanctioned for the Franchise Belt. We all knew that (as strange as it was). They then followed that by doing the same for the Kambosos fight.

I think I'm done with you. Your lack of awareness when faced with all manner of evidence is just getting too weird.