Who is Higher All Time Great? Pac or Floyd
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
After Pac, he went back up to 135 and fought Diaz; he lost.
He lost to Zahir before Pac and then after he lost to Pac twice, he lost again to Diaz.
Zahir was at lightweight; Pac was at 130; Diaz was at lightweight.
It shows where Morales was at in his career...agree with that?Comment
-
I agree that Morales can't beat a lightweight... ByeAfter Pac, he went back up to 135 and fought Diaz; he lost.
He lost to Zahir before Pac and then after he lost to Pac twice, he lost again to Diaz.
Zahir was at lightweight; Pac was at 130; Diaz was at lightweight.
It shows where Morales was at in his career...agree with that?Comment
-
-
Comment
-
I let it go because it's quite childish to use "bye" for such a discussion. He ran out of answers that could establish a credible case, which is why he used "bye."
I could have ended my conversation at any time with using "bye," but it's not my style and I try to let the other continue his case...but he had none left to give strength to his.
Example: Pac was KTFO twice; Morales was past his prime...Diaz was weak; Oscar was shot....bye
What kind of person would I be if that is what I would use?Last edited by Benny Leonard; 12-28-2008, 01:39 AM.Comment
-
the only moronic thing that stands out in this thread is bennyleonard's continuous bashing of roach's supposedly weight tactics (as if the other fighter was forced to sign on at that weight) while on the other hand, making roach's prefight statements about oscar as prophetic and using that as an excuse, only now IN HINDSIGHT AND AFTER THE FACT. how ******ly convenient.Comment
Comment