Who has the better resume at 130? Floyd Mayweather or Manny Pacquaio?

[Sithis]

how does anyone vote mayweather on this one?

[wmute]

I wonder if those 50+ people also rate highly Leonard run at 168 because he fought Hearns and Duran at those weights.

[wmute]

how does anyone vote mayweather on this one?

It must have something to do with the number 130 being different from 126.

[Guest]

how does anyone vote mayweather on this one?

28 victories 19 ko's a bunch of defenses as a champ.PBF never lost at superfeather and Pac has.
Even beloved Boxrec has him #1 all time at superfeather.
Pac's only fought there 8 times so this poll is a bit unfair to both guys.

Hence, so many votes for Mayweather because that's definitely where he made his bones.

[The Gambler1981]

I have yet to see anyone combat post #8 or better yet post #9 that said it even better. Manny beat some great names but great names do not mean that much when you look at the situations. To me anyways.

[Guest]

I have yet to see anyone combat post #8 or better yet post #9 that said it even better. Manny beat some great names but great names do not mean that much when you look at the situations. To me anyways.

No offense because we agree but I though slicksouthpaw hit the nail on the head the best. you were perhaps more concise, I will give you that.

Same point though for all of us who picked Mayweather.

[The Gambler1981]

No offense because we agree but I though slicksouthpaw hit the nail on the head the best. you were perhaps more concise, I will give you that.

Same point though for all of us who picked Mayweather.

He did that post was on point also, I didn't want to fish for it though (I knew where mine and the one after were 8)).

[El Jesus]

You're talking about a guy who started at 108 and fights toe to toe.

if mayweather was allowed to turn pro he would have likely started around there or 112, close to where he fought as an amatuer, that argument means nothing to me, because if thats the case, we can start counting pacs wack ass losses at those early weights as well. He was just a kid growing into his body, if americans could do the same, we would.

[wmute]

if mayweather was allowed to turn pro he would have likely started around there or 112, close to where he fought as an amatuer, that argument means nothing to me, because if thats the case, we can start counting pacs wack ass losses at those early weights as well. He was just a kid growing into his body, if americans could do the same, we would.

I think it's more like if pac could have had an am career in a wealthy country, he would have. But the point about weight is still valid.

[them_apples]

Pacquiao has a much better resume, for all the clowns saying Pacquiao's oponents were over the hill, need to STFU. Morales 3 was the only fight with an over the hill fighter. Pacquiao clearly got better and bigger in the second fight vs Morales, beat him up.

Morales is a better fighter than Corrales, Morales would have beat his ass if they had fought at 130.

Barrera wasn't over the hill, nobody thinks this..he was near Prime in the first fight.

Marquez just kicked Casamayors ass and beat Barrera, how is he over the hill..he also had 2 brutal fights with Pac-Man.