Who has the better resume at 130? Floyd Mayweather or Manny Pacquaio?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HappySlip
    Up and Comer
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Oct 2008
    • 48
    • 1
    • 0
    • 6,087

    #121
    Pac..... 3 words: Morales... Barrera.. Marquez.... (at a total of 11 knockdowns....)

    Comment

    • Ray*
      Be safe!!!
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 44867
      • 1,654
      • 1,608
      • 558,890

      #122
      Mayweather does have a better resume at 130 but he also stayed longer at 130 than Pacman.

      Mayweather beat people like Genaro Hernandez,Carlos rios, Angel manfredy, juuko,carlos genera, corrales, Carlos hernandez and jesus hernandez.....

      Compare those win to pacman's win over Erik morales (3), Larios, jorge solis,Velasquez, Barrera and JMM...and Mayweather definitely takes it at 130.

      Comment

      • wmute
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2003
        • 8083
        • 289
        • 446
        • 15,158

        #123
        Originally posted by shadeyfizzle
        I see what you're saying but Morales was a legit 130 champ and regarded far higher than any other titlist the division had at the time who were real 130ers. Its not necessarily Barrera, Morales, Pac or Marquez's fault they had to keep fighting each other. They just had to because they were really the best of the division
        They were the draw of the division. Why didnt any of them fight Guzman? certainly not because he was not good enough...

        It is true that Morales is the one of the 3 who actually fought some 130 fighters, and Pacman lost to him, when Erik was losing fight after fight...

        Comment

        • wmute
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2003
          • 8083
          • 289
          • 446
          • 15,158

          #124
          Originally posted by shadeyfizzle
          You know what my statement really implied smartass. I would also be curious to see Floyd knock out Morales
          The way Morales likes to fight, I think you would get that.

          Comment

          • CaRnAgEViOLaToR
            VeNoM
            • Aug 2008
            • 1547
            • 56
            • 6
            • 8,051

            #125
            to answer the question, i say pac but anyone that thinks pac beats floyd at 130 is a serious nuthugger

            Comment

            • wmute
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2003
              • 8083
              • 289
              • 446
              • 15,158

              #126
              Originally posted by JoartCC
              Actually I already explain in previous posts why...

              I just don't feel the need to educate morons and dimwits.

              Of course being me... from time to time I try to explain something in detail...

              Right now... All I have to do is point out the admission of cowardice and all other arguments become moot.

              I could explain this again why... and so forth...

              But again as I've said...

              I love playing with dimwits and mental midgets.

              Besides...

              If I endeavored to explain every point of everything that I say...

              Then guys like you will ACTUALLY LEARN and you guys will stop being idiots.

              Now that is not fun for me.
              DW congratuations for extracting this masterpiece from the village idiot

              Comment

              • wmute
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Nov 2003
                • 8083
                • 289
                • 446
                • 15,158

                #127
                Originally posted by xAUGUSTUSx
                Barrera, Moralas, and JJM were all on the P4P list when they fought Pac. So no you're wrong it's Pac.
                Jonh Ruiz could have been the greatest HW of all time if he beat Jones and Toney

                Comment

                • wmute
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Nov 2003
                  • 8083
                  • 289
                  • 446
                  • 15,158

                  #128
                  Originally posted by MrUnKnockoutabl
                  Hatton was proven to be a terrible Welterweight when he robbed Collazo of his title. Pac takes this pretty easily, I don't buy the weight drain excuse for morales or the Over-The hill excuse for Barrera. morales and Barrera both would eat everyone at or around 130 on floyd's resume for breakfast. Marquez would do the same, a prime Marquez may even beat Floyd at 130.

                  See.... The only common opponents are Chavez and Hernandez and Erik did not eat them for breakfast, whereas Mayweather dominated them. So your point is based on wishful thinking only.

                  Comment

                  • ¡VIVA MEXICO!
                    Banned
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Aug 2008
                    • 335
                    • 35
                    • 0
                    • 403

                    #129
                    Originally posted by wmute
                    See.... The only common opponents are Chavez and Hernandez and Erik did not eat them for breakfast, whereas Mayweather dominated them. So your point is based on wishful thinking only.
                    is this a joke? morales schooled both of them in very easy fights. hernandez didnt get a single round off morales. chavez got maybe 2 rounds off morales. they were very easy fights. you need to do yourself a favor and educate yourself. dont talk about fights you never seen.

                    and of course pac has the better resume. mayweather beat some good fighters at 130 i will give him credit for that. but pac beat legends. there is just no comparison.

                    Comment

                    • wmute
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 8083
                      • 289
                      • 446
                      • 15,158

                      #130
                      Originally posted by ¡VIVA MEXICO!
                      is this a joke? morales schooled both of them in very easy fights. hernandez didnt get a single round off morales. chavez got maybe 2 rounds off morales. they were very easy fights. you need to do yourself a favor and educate yourself. dont talk about fights you never seen.
                      Obviously you have not seen Mayweather vs Hernandez and Chavez.

                      Originally posted by ¡VIVA MEXICO!
                      and of course pac has the better resume. mayweather beat some good fighters at 130 i will give him credit for that. but pac beat legends. there is just no comparison.
                      Like I said, by this logic John Ruiz was 2 wins away from being the greatest HW of all times.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP