Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

..Who's Better: MAYWEATHER Or WHITAKER?...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Mayweather you nappy headed hoes.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Burner View Post
      Get off your high horse and debate my post....I guess you have no comments for it because I dont agree with you...

      Heres more....

      If I say Floyd is flawless....and you say "well he starts slow"......you lose that argument by first round ko bud.
      Stop it man, i'm a fan too and everyone is being reasonable but you. Noone is flawless.

      Also i don't agree Floyd was in his prime. At 31 he wasn't moving up to 154 wasn't the brightest idea but he HAD to fight Oscar....

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by C-Drone View Post
        That depends on the reason for starting slow. So, with Mayweather, since neither of us is Mayweather, we can only assume. Hence the reason I said it could be a weakness.
        Maywweather starts slow ?What fights were you watching.I never seen Mayweather start slow.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Black Jesus View Post
          i can tell quite a few people in this thread have never seen whitaker fight. i personally think mayweather is better because he posessed the edge in power. speed/defense/movement/intelligence, both of them have it all, but whitaker has the better resume, but he also had alot more great fighters in his prime weightclass to be matched up against then mayweather. however if mayweather stepped it up at welterweight for just 1 or 2 more years, he would surpass him.

          mayweather i think is better, but whitaker has the better resume. but whitaker was my dude for years, it hurts for me to say anyone might be better than him because he was so special to watch.
          Whitaker has better power than people give him credit for. No, he did not have a lot of knockouts. but his straight left upstairs packed quite a bit of power. what was weird was that that power sort of showed up as he left his prime, with that brutal KO over Hurtado and he actually hurt Trinidad at a point in their fight...which was surprising to me.

          and his body punching ability is very underrated to me. he really dug to the body hard, and Im pretty sure he was able to break Poli Diaz's ribs in their fight.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by blackirish137 View Post
            Whitaker has better power than people give him credit for. No, he did not have a lot of knockouts. but his straight left upstairs packed quite a bit of power. what was weird was that that power sort of showed up as he left his prime, with that brutal KO over Hurtado and he actually hurt Trinidad at a point in their fight...which was surprising to me.

            and his body punching ability is very underrated to me. he really dug to the body hard, and Im pretty sure he was able to break Poli Diaz's ribs in their fight.
            I agree. When he sat down on his shots, he had good power.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by C-Drone View Post
              One thing that I realized didn't REALLY get mentioned was that they DID have a common opponent.

              De La Hoya. WIth that being said, how do you think that changes this argument?
              Whitaker fought a MUCH better version of DLH than Floyd did. Pea was 33 at the time and starting to slip but a lot of people think he still beat DLH.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by C-Drone View Post
                Floyd will/would lose to anyone with a consistent jab. Oscar, who only used it half the fight was winning on the scorecards (I don't care about your card, because your card doesn't matter) and if he kept using it, Floyd would have a 1 after his wins. Simple as that. That's a flaw. Deny it all you want, but film doens't lie.

                I'm not on a high horse, you're generally tolerable, though fanatic at times. This is just delusional, and not worth it.

                There's your response.
                Floyd was dodging a majority of the jabs.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by flodistheshizle View Post
                  Maywweather starts slow ?What fights were you watching.I never seen Mayweather start slow.
                  Losing, arguably, the first four rounds to Zab Judah isn't starting slow? Losing 3 to 4 rounds out of the first 6 with De La Hoya isn't starting slow?

                  You can like Mayweather. But don't deny film.


                  Keep in mind, I said recently.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by flodistheshizle View Post
                    Floyd was dodging a majority of the jabs.
                    That's the beauty of a jab. It doesn't HAVE to land to be effective. It just makes you reset, throws off your timing when effective and allows you to dictate the pace of the fight.

                    For the first 6 rounds, Oscar was doing that.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View Post
                      Whitaker fought a MUCH better version of DLH than Floyd did. Pea was 33 at the time and starting to slip but a lot of people think he still beat DLH.
                      Very good point.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP