Originally posted by Burner
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
..Who's Better: MAYWEATHER Or WHITAKER?...
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by C-Drone View PostHe didn't stop the jab when Floyd turned it on, it was BEFORE that. He just stopped. Perhaps due to stamina issues, which he's known to have.
The jab will beat Floyd. MARK MY WORDS. A hard jab takes it's toll on your body, and Oscar got tired. A fresher Oscar, younger Oscar would have made that fight EVEN CLOSER.
Jab, and you beat Mayweather. When you double that jab up, switch it with the double-jab and feint, like Oscar WAS doing, but keep it up, you offset histiming. You beat him.
For years the haters would say "pressure is the way to beat Mayweather,jose Luis Castillo "Showed" us this"
Despite the fact That Mayweather was fighting with a hurt shoulder and beat him easily in the rematch.And went on to destroy Ndoh,Corly,Baldomir,Hatton,Bruseles and other Pressure fighters.
Now its: "the Jab is the way to beat Mayweather"
Gatti, Ndou,bruseeles,Genaro Hernandez all threw jabs and look what happened to them.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by flodistheshizle View PostFor years the haters would say "pressure is the way to beat Mayweather,jose Luis Castillo "Showed" us this"
Despite the fact That Mayweather was fighting with a hurt shoulder and beat him easily in the rematch.And went on to destroy Ndoh,Corly,Baldomir,Hatton,Bruseles and other Pressure fighters.
Now its: "the Jab is the way to beat Mayweather"
Gatti, Ndou,bruseeles,Genaro Hernandez all threw jabs and look what happened to them.
I'm talking about a hard stiff jab, that sets up other punches, with feints involved. Lateral movement, and the ability to set the pace and offset the opponents timing. Throw in double and triple jab.
NONE of those fighters do that. Oscar did it in the first half of the fight and it worked VERY WELL. It doesn't need to land every time, to be working.
ALSO, I'm not a Mayweather hater. I'm just not delusional. Everyone has a weakness, everyone can lose, everyone. EVERYONE.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16 View PostI noticed that a few people are saying that Mayweather has every advantage over Whitaker, which is certainly wrong. Whitaker has better inside game, has better footspeed, is the better out boxer ,is the faster starter and has slightly better adaptability than Mayweather. One advantage for Mayweather that i do like is his advantage in power which makes him more exciting to watch. You can never go wrong with a knockout but i personally enjoy seeing technical matches just as much.
Comment
-
Originally posted by C-Drone View PostLosing, arguably, the first four rounds to Zab Judah isn't starting slow? Losing 3 to 4 rounds out of the first 6 with De La Hoya isn't starting slow?
You can like Mayweather. But don't deny film.
Keep in mind, I said recently.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Xplosivo View Postconsidering dlh won 2 out of the first 6 rounds
Check the scorecard. Out of the first FOUR rounds, with two judges giving him the SAME THREE ROUNDS, he won the 2nd, 3rd and 4th rounds.
So, the scorecard you wrote on your handy-dandy notebook, kind of doesn't matter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by flodistheshizle View PostThats adpating slow to a slick fast southpaw,not starting slow.
Comment
Comment