Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

..Who's Better: MAYWEATHER Or WHITAKER?...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Burner View Post
    Robinson is greater but talent wise....gimme a break.

    No....Mayweather is flawless.....years from now they'll breakdown the tape and it'll show...he was ****ing perfect..a brilliant boxer...love him or hate him.

    He was a machine.

    Judah who has good pop landed flush a plenty "during Floyds slow start"....he just smiled..everytime....he should be surprised when he gets hit flush because it rarely happens.

    Hes the master at taking his opponent strenghts and their best punch into ****......

    How many left hooks did Oscar land???

    How many rights tot he body did Hatton land??

    How many power shots did Corrales land??

    If you were a trainer If you could name one fighter today who you wouldnt want YOUR fighter to face(paydays and exposure aside).....it would be Floyd....its almost an automatic lost now a days.
    You're delusional if you think he's flawless. Honestly, a comment like that ends the conversation. You're not able to be reasonable about something, I'm not speaking to you about that subject. It's pointless.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Burner View Post
      Robinson is greater but talent wise....gimme a break.

      No....Mayweather is flawless.....years from now they'll breakdown the tape and it'll show...he was ****ing perfect..a brilliant boxer...love him or hate him.
      No he's not, he loses to Paul Williams, remember Burner?

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by C-Drone View Post
        You're delusional if you think he's flawless. Honestly, a comment like that ends the conversation. You're not able to be reasonable about something, I'm not speaking to you about that subject. It's pointless.
        Get off your high horse and debate my post....I guess you have no comments for it because I dont agree with you...

        Heres more....

        If I say Floyd is flawless....and you say "well he starts slow"......you lose that argument by first round ko bud.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by KnockoutTheFat View Post
          No he's not, he loses to Paul Williams, remember Burner?
          He can't. He's flawless. He's never had one weakness, ever. And if he did, he made it alllll better and he's the most complete fighter, EVER.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by C-Drone View Post
            He can't. He's flawless. He's never had one weakness, ever. And if he did, he made it alllll better and he's the most complete fighter, EVER.
            That spot is only reserved for Tye Fields, nobody else.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Burner View Post
              Get off your high horse and debate my post....I guess you have no comments for it because I dont agree with you...

              Heres more....

              If I say Floyd is flawless....and you say "well he starts slow"......you lose that argument by first round ko bud.

              Floyd will/would lose to anyone with a consistent jab. Oscar, who only used it half the fight was winning on the scorecards (I don't care about your card, because your card doesn't matter) and if he kept using it, Floyd would have a 1 after his wins. Simple as that. That's a flaw. Deny it all you want, but film doens't lie.

              I'm not on a high horse, you're generally tolerable, though fanatic at times. This is just delusional, and not worth it.

              There's your response.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by KnockoutTheFat View Post
                No he's not, he loses to Paul Williams, remember Burner?
                Today.....Floyd would win...2 years from now Paul would win....even the greats slow down..and when Floyd loses thosae reflexes...oh boy.

                Paul Williams is a matchup nightmare for anyone..styles makes fight.....
                anyone can lose to anyone.....

                whether its a lucky punch, dq, overlooking an opponent, getting robbed.

                I dont expect Floyd to be able to beat a 6-4ish.....160 pound..welter who fights southpaw and hits like a truck...do you???

                Comment


                • #28
                  Mayweather is not flawless, he just hides them very well.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by KnockoutTheFat View Post
                    That spot is only reserved for Tye Fields, nobody else.
                    Very true. Don't know what I was thinking.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by C-Drone View Post
                      Floyd will/would lose to anyone with a consistent jab. Oscar, who only used it half the fight was winning on the scorecards (I don't care about your card, because your card doesn't matter) and if he kept using it, Floyd would have a 1 after his wins. Simple as that. That's a flaw. Deny it all you want, but film doens't lie.

                      I'm not on a high horse, you're generally tolerable, though fanatic at times. This is just delusional, and not worth it.

                      There's your response.
                      Okay so Jab Floyd...jab him good.....BUT.......

                      You just agreed with me..........

                      That was Oscars best punch during THAT fight right???...well what happened to it.....

                      Its hard to pop that hard jab....when you get hit clean everytime the guy throws...."it wasnt the night of the jab remmber"....Oscar knows that **** wasnt going to get him a "w".

                      After a while...that overhand right was landed perfect....Floyd was timing the **** out of Oscar...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP