That's exactly what I'm talking about and I'm not denying that. But you're proving my point. The guy was 44-0 coming into the fight, considered the Real legitimate Jr.welter champ. He defeated a future hall of famer and probably one of the greatest 140's of all times in Kostya Tszyu ending his career. He was a 2-division champ like Cotto and many favored him because of his Castillo-esque style which gave Floyd problems.But he still wasn't great. So what's the difference with Cotto? It's the same thing, people think that Cotto has something the other guys don't and are sure that he will beat Floyd.
But what if he doesn't? Is Cotto considered a great fighter regardless of how he performs against Floyd?
I don't think he is and some guys will come out and call him overrated I guarantee...just like Hatton.
Comment