Originally posted by Dr. Z
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why Jack Johnson is Not as Great as You We’re Told
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Ivich View PostNice to read a post that isn't clouded by hatred. It's been suggested,by one of the haters, that Johnson could have fought Jeannette in1911 who did Jeannette beat that year to make him a viable contender?
He lost twice to Langford and could only draw with Jim Barry,and Tony Ross whom the two haters describe as rubbish.Johnson of course toyed with Ross,flooring him 3 times.
Gunboat Smith has also been named as a viable challenger in1911.That year he lost to and drew with 10-5-2 Charlie Miller,lost to 27-14-8 Jim Barry and was knocked out by journeyman Jack Geyer 11-3-1.
Ivich likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
With performances like that it seems like a forced narrative to say those guys were top contenders who were deserving of a title shot.
Smith turned pro in 1909. He lost a few on the way up. By 1913 he was definitely a contender beating Frank Moran ( Johnson fought him a title shot ), defeated Jess Willard who ko'd Johnson, Ko'd Fireman Flynn and Ross ( who received title shots form Johnson ) and beat the highly avoid Sam Langford who Johnson refused to mix with as champ. I'd say he was qualified for a title shot, wouldn't you? Yet he was avoided. Hmmmmmm....
" And he never forgot it " the punch that put Johnson down and left him dazed. - Smith who was interviewed in the book in this corner.Last edited by Dr. Z; 09-29-2022, 04:08 PM.GhostofDempsey likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
With performances like that it seems like a forced narrative to say those guys were top contenders who were deserving of a title shot.
A year later Langford took him out in3 rds
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Z View Post
Smith turned pro in 1909. He lost a few on the way up. By 1913 he was definitely a contender beating Frank Moran ( Johnson fought him a title shot ), defeated Jess Willard who ko'd Johnson, Ko'd Fireman Flynn and Ross ( who received title shots form Johnson ) and beat the highly avoid Sam Langford who Johnson refused to mix with as champ. I'd say he was qualified for a title shot, wouldn't you? Yet he was avoided. Hmmmmmm....
" And he never forgot it " the punch that put Johnson down and left him dazed. - Smith who was interviewed in the book in this corner.
Who knows if he wins without his doctored wraps. Also, who knows how much he used them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Z View Post
Smith turned pro in 1909. He lost a few on the way up. By 1913 he was definitely a contender beating Frank Moran ( Johnson fought him a title shot ), defeated Jess Willard who ko'd Johnson, Ko'd Fireman Flynn and Ross ( who received title shots form Johnson ) and beat the highly avoid Sam Langford who Johnson refused to mix with as champ. I'd say he was qualified for a title shot, wouldn't you? Yet he was avoided. Hmmmmmm....
" And he never forgot it " the punch that put Johnson down and left him dazed. - Smith who was interviewed in the book in this corner.
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View Post
Gunboat Smith beat Willard with insulation tape for hand wraps. Nearly ripped off Willard's ear.
Who knows if he wins without his doctored wraps. Also, who knows how much he used them.
Can you show any history of this tape existing before 1925? Because some guy had a 1925 patent issued under that name. That tape was cloth and rubber based and used for paint masking.
There doesn't seem to be any plastic based tapes until the 1940s. So why does a cloth/rubber based tape inside a glove rip off an ear?
Dr. Z likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post
What's insulation tape suspose to do?
Can you show any history of this tape existing before 1925? Because some guy had a 1925 patent issued under that name. That tape was cloth and rubber based and used for paint masking.
There doesn't seem to be any plastic based tapes until the 1940s. So why does a cloth/rubber based tape inside a glove rip off an ear?
Dr. Z likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
Fitzsimmons wrapped his hands with electrical tape for the second fight with Jim Jeffries in 1902.
Any tape called insulation tape before then was going to be cloth and/or rubber based. So how is that an advantage in a leather glove?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post
What's insulation tape suspose to do?
Can you show any history of this tape existing before 1925? Because some guy had a 1925 patent issued under that name. That tape was cloth and rubber based and used for paint masking.
There doesn't seem to be any plastic based tapes until the 1940s. So why does a cloth/rubber based tape inside a glove rip off an ear?
Of the Willard scrap, Smith reports with all due honesty (in Peter Heller’s “In This Corner”) that, “So in the tenth round I hit him with one of my right hands, but it was on the ear. Tore his ear right off. That hushed him up for the rest of the fight. The blood was running down, and Oh God, I, of course, had my gloves “loaded”. I had insulation tape laid across my hands.”
https://www.the13thround.com/phpBB2/...ic.php?t=28806
The article also tells why his career went down hill.
Comment
Comment