Sergio Martinez vs John Mugabi

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dan_cov
    Zombie Taylor
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2011
    • 24532
    • 3,213
    • 3,273
    • 145,001

    #31
    Originally posted by jabsRstiff
    I didn't even realize when quoting SCTrojan that he actually said Martinez has more power than Mugabi.

    We are all entitled to our opinions...even when they're ABSURD. I think Martinez is a better fighter than Mugabi, but anyone who wants to (pretends) think Martinez could punch harder than Mugabi is a buffoon.


    It is debatable IMO
    Mugabi didn't knock anybody out or even drop anybody worth knowing for that matter
    Sure he was crushing cans but when he stepped up his power was wasn't to be found.

    Martinez on the other hand is knocking out & dropping world class fighters with granite chins. Time after time he is stopping guys who haven't even been down before.

    Call me a buffoon but I think Sergio's power is far more proven at world level.

    Comment

    • Poet682006
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Mar 2007
      • 17931
      • 1,181
      • 1,350
      • 26,849

      #32
      Originally posted by jabsRstiff
      I didn't even realize when quoting SCTrojan that he actually said Martinez has more power than Mugabi.

      We are all entitled to our opinions...even when they're ABSURD. I think Martinez is a better fighter than Mugabi, but anyone who wants to (pretends) think Martinez could punch harder than Mugabi is a buffoon.
      It's his ideology. Trojan thinks the weakest punchers of today punch much harder than the biggest punchers of the 80s so natually Martinez MUST punch harder than Mugabi :nuts9:

      Comment

      • jabsRstiff
        ! ! ! !
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2004
        • 8964
        • 498
        • 136
        • 16,167

        #33
        Originally posted by dan_cov
        It is debatable IMO
        Mugabi didn't knock anybody out or even drop anybody worth knowing for that matter
        Sure he was crushing cans but when he stepped up his power was wasn't to be found.

        Martinez on the other hand is knocking out & dropping world class fighters with granite chins. Time after time he is stopping guys who haven't even been down before.

        Call me a buffoon but I think Sergio's power is far more proven at world level.
        Curtis Parker was KOd in one round by Mugabi. Parker went head-to-head with the best middleweight contenders of the early 80's and none of them stopped him.....don't even think any hurt him. Mugabi bombed him in one round.

        Believe me, John Mugabi was a much bigger puncher than Martinez. Mugabi will make many historians biggest punchers list decades from now, while Martinez won't be on anyone's.

        Again, Martinez is a superior fighter, but not on Mugabi's level for punching power.

        Comment

        • dan_cov
          Zombie Taylor
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2011
          • 24532
          • 3,213
          • 3,273
          • 145,001

          #34
          Originally posted by jabsRstiff
          Curtis Parker was KOd in one round by Mugabi. Parker went head-to-head with the best middleweight contenders of the early 80's and none of them stopped him.....don't even think any hurt him. Mugabi bombed him in one round.

          Believe me, John Mugabi was a much bigger puncher than Martinez. Mugabi will make many historians biggest punchers list decades from now, while Martinez won't be on anyone's.

          Again, Martinez is a superior fighter, but not on Mugabi's level for punching power.




          These ''historians'' will say anything in an attempt of saying these old timers was superior to the modern day fighter. You only have to look how highly they rate fighters with as many or more losses as wins to realise this.

          How the fcuk can you put a fighter with say 40+ losses, 50 odd draws in the top 50 ever, seriously?

          Parker was never world class, he fought a handful of top 10-20 guys and lost everytime.
          Mugabi was a very good puncher no doubt but he was no world class puncher. A poor mans Miranda.
          He was no Benn, G-man, Hearns, Hagler.

          Comment

          • Poet682006
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Mar 2007
            • 17931
            • 1,181
            • 1,350
            • 26,849

            #35
            Originally posted by dan_cov
            These ''historians'' will say anything in an attempt of saying these old timers was superior to the modern day fighter. You only have to look how highly they rate fighters with as many or more losses as wins to realise this.

            How the fcuk can you put a fighter with say 40+ losses, 50 odd draws in the top 50 ever, seriously?

            Parker was never world class, he fought a handful of top 10-20 guys and lost everytime.
            Mugabi was a very good puncher no doubt but he was no world class puncher. A poor mans Miranda.
            He was no Benn, G-man, Hearns, Hagler.
            ^^^^^ Tunney's little "Mini-Me" :jerk0ff9:

            Comment

            • Barn
              TheTartanSoldier
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2010
              • 8647
              • 675
              • 624
              • 42,074

              #36
              Changed my opinion since then. Martinez suffers a knockdown en route to a 116-112 esque decision. Beats the Beast to the punch and is able to move off fast enough for the somewhat robotic Mugabi, who tries very hard but just can't time Martinez who in this instance is too slick.

              Comment

              • Barn
                TheTartanSoldier
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2010
                • 8647
                • 675
                • 624
                • 42,074

                #37
                Originally posted by dan_cov
                These ''historians'' will say anything in an attempt of saying these old timers was superior to the modern day fighter. You only have to look how highly they rate fighters with as many or more losses as wins to realise this.

                How the fcuk can you put a fighter with say 40+ losses, 50 odd draws in the top 50 ever, seriously?

                Parker was never world class, he fought a handful of top 10-20 guys and lost everytime.
                Mugabi was a very good puncher no doubt but he was no world class puncher. A poor mans Miranda.
                He was no Benn, G-man, Hearns, Hagler.
                Just curious as to who you're referring to.

                Comment

                • SCtrojansbaby
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 5951
                  • 136
                  • 72
                  • 12,653

                  #38
                  Martinez is better in every conceivable way. Heck I am not even sure if Mugabi beats Daren Barker

                  Comment

                  • jabsRstiff
                    ! ! ! !
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jun 2004
                    • 8964
                    • 498
                    • 136
                    • 16,167

                    #39
                    Mugabi was a very good puncher no doubt but he was no world class puncher. A poor mans Miranda.

                    Lord.

                    Comment

                    • elgranluchadore
                      i did it
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 1823
                      • 81
                      • 41
                      • 8,235

                      #40
                      i agree, i think miranda might even beat mugabi

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP