Do you mean this list. Notice Holmes is on there. Fury the most recent lineal champion. No mention of Joshua though.
- - Meaning Marvin Hart is closer to beating The Man than Flubber is, so Marv > than Flubber by several degrees of separation.
Yeah, I agree Candyland is too advanced in rules for you to understand. Did you receive your Lineal Idiot Tinfoil Hat in the mail or was it a local presentation?
- - Meaning Marvin Hart is closer to beating The Man than Flubber is, so Marv > than Flubber by several degrees of separation.
Yeah, I agree Candyland is too advanced in rules for you to understand. Did you receive your Lineal Idiot Tinfoil Hat in the mail or was it a local presentation?
So are you saying Wlad wasn't lineal at the time Fury dismantled him? Hmm, I wonder why all these historians have gotten this wrong?
Far older, and Far less convoluted than the British Monarchy, which traces its origins only back to the petty kingdoms of Anglo-Saxon England & early medieval Scotland, which consolidated into the kingdoms of England and Scotland in the 10th century;
The Boxing lineage ("Fighting upright whilst using the upper extremities for punching, blocking and parrying and the lower extremities for evasive movement, balance, positioning and leverage, with sharply limited use of trips, throws, buts, elbows and kicks, and the full eschewance of shoots, ground grappling, eye gouging, biting, kneeing, choking, joint hyperextending holds, fish hooking, strikes below the sash and general buggery"), dates back to the first recorded World Heavyweight Champion, Onomastos of Smyrna in 688 BC.
Onomastos held his title until 672 BC, when, in the 27th Olympic games, Diappos from Kroton became the new Champion. It all leads unequivocally right up to Tyson Fury.
History revisionists are almost in the same class of person as grave robbers, child ******ers, rapists, wife beaters, arsonists and purse snatchers. Almost. They mess with the balance.
So are you saying Wlad wasn't lineal at the time Fury dismantled him? Hmm, I wonder why all these historians have gotten this wrong?
Both Holmes and Fury are lineal. Live with it.
- - Wlad was Ring Champ and a delayed one as well.
Lineal references are like general references to crack. Both exist within that same strata and both have smack to do with boxing save some in or who follow boxing like to use one and the other interchangeably.
- - Wlad was Ring Champ and a delayed one as well.
Lineal references are like general references to crack. Both exist within that same strata and both have smack to do with boxing save some in or who follow boxing like to use one and the other interchangeably.
Lineal doesn't change because some people came up with boxing orgs to profit. Holmes and Fury....both lineal champions. The true world champions of their respective eras.
Lineal doesn't change because some people came up with boxing orgs to profit. Holmes and Fury....both lineal champions. The true world champions of their respective eras.
I agree but think Holmes' claim stronger. Fury needs more than one big name, three times.
When it's done he'll be remembered as a lineal champion but there's still a 'wait and see' buzzing around him.
Lineal doesn't change because some people came up with boxing orgs to profit. Holmes and Fury....both lineal champions. The true world champions of their respective eras.
- - Lineal = Anarchy = No cogent rules to live by save law of the jungle. You don't live in an anarchy, but no doubt you vote that way.
Lar 0-6, 0 KO vs standing champs winning their title in the ring forever more...forever more...
Comment