Im talking champions... The actual size of the average heavyweight champions historically. Again, a top ten is a relative list and could reflect a trend... Show me a list of heavyweight champions where there is a straight rise in size from around the time of Louis to the present. Yes fighters right now may be bigger but it does not tell us that this makes them better... top ten of quality is a percent of quality, top ten of crap is a percent of crap and nothing more. Usyk by all accounts should be getting battered! lol.
I agree about Marciano thats my point! It may NOT BE GOOD that these Top Ten fighters are so big... it may reflect a lack of conditioning, etc. SO, it may be a choice for a fighter to come in lighter... we have not changed genetically man! Think it through. We have not "evolved" in any sense of Darwin's meaning. Guys fight at a very heavy point right now... even Fury fights best when he is light, not more than 260 and he is huge.
Regarding Tyson and Holly, yes, that is a more average weight for a heavyweight. There is more to size than just weight... Liston was huge, but did not weigh that much... His size was in his hands, shoulders, etc... Bill Fitz who weighed like 170 soaking wet, was a lightweight from the weight down and massive from the waist up. Ditto for a guy like Bauer who had huge shoulders and was consequently one of the hardest hitters....there is more to size than weight, thats the point.
Marciano chose to come in as light as possible as was what fighters trained to do those days... that was a preference. No fighter today would even attempt to get down to such a weight and it doesn't matter because small heavyweights are not the average anymore than are large champion fighters compared to the average size of a great heavyweight... Both are a deviation until such time that the average size of a great heavyweights exceeds 205-230 or so.
Ever fought a guy who was faster, more mobile and could pressure you because he had no extra weight? Thats no fun either. I fought martial arts. that was my baliwick... and the same applies. I did fight as the lighter guy against a demon (my teacher lol) and yeah its a disadvantage for sure. I also used mobility and that was its own advantage at times... its all relative.
I agree about Marciano thats my point! It may NOT BE GOOD that these Top Ten fighters are so big... it may reflect a lack of conditioning, etc. SO, it may be a choice for a fighter to come in lighter... we have not changed genetically man! Think it through. We have not "evolved" in any sense of Darwin's meaning. Guys fight at a very heavy point right now... even Fury fights best when he is light, not more than 260 and he is huge.
Regarding Tyson and Holly, yes, that is a more average weight for a heavyweight. There is more to size than just weight... Liston was huge, but did not weigh that much... His size was in his hands, shoulders, etc... Bill Fitz who weighed like 170 soaking wet, was a lightweight from the weight down and massive from the waist up. Ditto for a guy like Bauer who had huge shoulders and was consequently one of the hardest hitters....there is more to size than weight, thats the point.
Marciano chose to come in as light as possible as was what fighters trained to do those days... that was a preference. No fighter today would even attempt to get down to such a weight and it doesn't matter because small heavyweights are not the average anymore than are large champion fighters compared to the average size of a great heavyweight... Both are a deviation until such time that the average size of a great heavyweights exceeds 205-230 or so.
Ever fought a guy who was faster, more mobile and could pressure you because he had no extra weight? Thats no fun either. I fought martial arts. that was my baliwick... and the same applies. I did fight as the lighter guy against a demon (my teacher lol) and yeah its a disadvantage for sure. I also used mobility and that was its own advantage at times... its all relative.
Comment