moltres

what round does danny knock him out?

who else has done that? im not a historian. 4 decades you know.90's, 00's, 10's, 20's. did he go any decade undefeated? i think he won his first belt 1998 or 99 as a minor basically. age dont mean crap in fighting terms. a 16 year old can beat down a 28 yr old man in the street or in the ring if they train of course. touché to him. who's next for pac for his resume if not crawford, spence or danny garcia? is there anyone? literally has to be one of them for him to actually get pumped up really.

forget the year one, do this one, my vote is DirkdigglerUK and NewEngland idk how to make it an official vote but whatsever mods take over and sticky. We can also do mod of the decade. :boxing::boxing::boxing:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/boxing/10461025/logan-paul-ksi-pay-per-view-uk-buys/amp/ was it on ppv in the usa? and i got a question. when mayweather pac got it on, they got 4.6m, was that just in the usa? id like to know how much it sold in the uk alone. sorry if been posted

ive been reading its a weak division. you think he can beat any of the current champs?

https://youtu.be/M4l3uGkX75c in a 4 rounder

https://youtu.be/z7jUNMtNGiQ maybe been posted but someone can embed, im on a phone

i think i would, would be interesting. vote and i mean an autobiography, me thinks.

he'd be merking. he'd merk canelo. he was underrated. and sexy. martinez vs williams is a classic. old skool fight. prime sergio was great.

and become hw champ. ruiz is fat, and only 6'2 i think.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-4959050/Violence-Stuttgart-ahead-Chris-Eubank-Jr-s-fight.html

with somebody currently in there prime. i got sergio and paul will, i feel they beat all of canelo and gggs opponents, apart from each other (if ya get me). id love to see these fighting each other. i also would like trinidad cause i aint seen a lot of him and i hear he was one of the best. try not to go toooooo old. and match them up.

i aint seen the facts in ages, i love how they are copied on a word document. reading them makes me laff. let me see the facts.

https://youtu.be/c2vC85CWt3Y likely fake like some of the nike adverts started to be. oops if been posted

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/sep/18/rio-ferdinand-boxing-manchester-united-curtis-woodhouse weird. i wouldnt say boxing is for futbol stars, they have good stamina in there prime to play 120 mins at high intensity, but thats about it. im sure he will be better than freddie flintoff and now way was i going to call the great world wide sport of football, soccer. i only say soccer to american girls. soz lads. im pretty sure he will look better then freddie flintoff. he threw throwing punches, like he was throwing a ball. funny af. more sources using the mother of sources, google.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing/article-4894330/Gennady-Golovkin-Canelo-Alvarez-judge-disciplined.html oops if its been posted.

or is it hard to differentiate what a tko is then to give someone an 8 count? lets be honest, we have all seen a fight where we thought a standing 8 count maybe would of made it better, last longer, maybe the fight would of changed due to the opponent throwing lots of hard shots, as in they get tired. maybe they stopped it cause its likely the guy will be KO'd which aint good for health. I cant even think of a fight where its happened. would you like to see them? anyone got any examples where it should of happened? maybe joshua klitscko imo.

how different do you think it will make them? how different would it make a normal fight? Id like your view. for e.g. welterweight, thurman / spence at 155. (assuming they put on around 8 pounds. for e.g. canelo ggg @ 170. im guessing they will both be around that even though its at 160. and at 168, ward vs froch @ 176. (assuming) Could it change the outcome of fights? Thing what people dont get is, if you lose weight correctly for a weight advantage, you can have more muscle then your opponant and be stronger. So you starve yourself for maybe 48 hours, you weight for e.g. 164 that day, you starve etc, and weigh just under 160, hours after the weigh in, you weight 165 as you get hydrated and another 24 hours youre at 170. If you lose weight like de la hoya did vs pac and cant put on no weight after, thats no advantage obviously. he was severley drained. But as floyd has shown, it dont always mean you will be drained, as he never has to starve. Sometimes the weight is just food in your gut. Thats why i sometimes see a ripped fighter weigh in, and fight night there abs have gone. im asking this for good reason. The body acts in survival mode when starved, so if you eat, it will store more as fat, rather then when your aint starved ****floyd) you can just be eat and be cool. get me though? im not writing up to B+ standard for you guys, piss off :)

or the organisation you thinks the worst. for me would take the gold medal for my country, though winning the strap could make you more money as we seen with the american bum joshua beat. if its 3 world titles, maybe id change my mind. and if there was only one organisation i may change my mind. also, the length i hold the belt, how i got the belt and how i lose the belt. vote on 1 gold medal, 1 abc belt could be interesting think of the crappy boxers whos been world champ in different classes recently. theres normal guys who maybe could get down to 130 and be a decent boxer, disclaimer is you need a good coach so you weigh 145 fight night. im thinking of a guy. 'fighter of the decade'. theres boxers who could never win gold ever, even if they stayed amateur who have won top belts. sorry guys, i only try and use good grammar with girls, im sure you understanding :)

enjoy.

a non fight fan to watch? ill start, full fight: cotto vs torres , paul williams vs margarito highlights: marquez vs katsidis or naseem hamed vs kevin kelly round: castillo vs corrales round 10, or froch vs taylor round 12 or martinez vs jcc jr round 12 just a note, a lot of these fights happened around the same era, boxing might not ever have an era like that again. i hope it does though. you dont see it till its over. go, it maybe a fight not a lot of people have watched but its on the tube.

I think both yes and no can be argued? What did you think and did you change your mind? dont lie about it, its a bit of fun.

In early 1998, Roy Jones, Jr. announced that he was relinquishing his WBC light heavyweight title. In response, the WBC ordered a bout between Graciano Rocchigiani from Germany and the former champion Michael Nunn to fill the vacancy, sanctioning it as a world championship match. On 21 March 1998, Rocchigiani won the fight and a WBC belt; in the subsequent WBC rankings, he was listed as "Light-Heavyweight World Champion". Jones, however, had a change of heart and asked if the WBC would reinstate him as the champion. In a move that violated nearly a dozen of its own regulations, the WBC granted the reinstatement. Rocchigiani received a letter from the WBC advising that the publication of his name as champion was a typographical error, and he had never been the official title holder. Rocchigiani immediately filed a lawsuit against the WBC in a U.S. federal court, claiming that the organization's actions were both contrary to their own rules, and injurious to his earning potential (due to diminished professional stature). On 7 May 2003, the judge ruled in Rocchigiani's favor, awarding him $30 million (U.S.) in damages and reinstating him as a former WBC champion (Rocchigiani had lost a bout since his WBC title match). The following day, the WBC sought protection by filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (i.e., corporate debt restructuring) in Puerto Rico. The organization spent the next 13 months trying to negotiate a six-figure settlement with Rocchigiani, but the fighter at first rejected the proposal. On 11 June 2004, the WBC announced it would enter Chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidation (i.e., business closing and total asset sell-off) proceedings, effectively ending its existence. This action prompted some in the boxing community to plead with Rocchigiani to settle the dispute, which he did in mid-July 2004. The WBC continues. __________________________________ maybe it was just me who didnt know lol. It says they awarded Nunn 30 million then it says WBC tried to settle a 6 figure settlement? that bits confusing.

who you got? be sure porter knowns he has to punch khan once with a good shot and khan does the harlem shake. i think it should be made. i got porter.

i would of liked to have seen blows landed before the ref starts waving his hands. joshua landed an uppercut maybe 30 secs previously which caused the stoppage basically. but i think klit was defending when the fight was actually stopped. joshua didnt land hardly nothing when klitchko was on the ropes. ive watched the stoppage twice. what do you all think? the stoppage could be good for klitchko as he wasnt ko'd unconscious and can fight again knowing he wasnt really badly ko'd.

maybe the next wrestlemania, maybe raw, maybe something with irelands drew mcintyre who recently signed with wwe again. and shemus. if he beats floyd the internet is going to freeze. 😎😎 he wont beat floyd but he has a good chance at beating aj styles

prime vitaili. who wins?

in no order Wilder joshua fury lets say klitscko retires, he's 41, he might have 2 more fights at most, he wont be around for long, who are the other 2 top heavies right now who could potentially beat the 3 listed or atleast challenge them. bellew is a cruiser, but there could be some cruisers who could move up. had to mention bellew, he seems to want to fight after beating a crippled haye. you can name up and coming fighters who will make the top 10 right now, but i mainly want 2 more fighters to make the top 5. tiger mohammed would beat up all of them 3 mentioned

both say 6'6, they both had on shoes and kllit was clearly taller by an inch. which one is it?

i keep hearing how great of an amateur he was, okay cool. Why didnt they throw him in at the deep end like they did Lomachenko and Rigondeux which imo, might be the only amateurs better than GGG. you can name me better amateur if you want. I was a fan back then, ive had a few crap years where i havent been watching as many fights as i could. But GGG is nearly 35. that means in 2010, when Sergio was beating the likes, and KO'd the likes of Paul Williams, and never ducked anyone at 154, and 160... GGG was 27 years old, what was he doing? i wont look at he's boxrec, someone can tell me here. I keep reading how good of a amateur he was, Lomo fights a champion in his first fight, Rigondeaux fights donaire who probs outweighed him 15 pounds fight night and breaks his face. What was GGG doing then? Why didnt he fight anyone decent? im sure he could of got in with someone decent between 2008 and 2013. he was 25+ and had boxed all his life.