So with that theory you got Floyd being better than SRR , Henry Armstrong, Ray Leonard , Joe Walcott, Kid Gavilan, all welterweights and all considered p4p better than Floyd with his 50-0 record. Why is Manny any different to you? hmmm
As I already explained, I have Floyd #1 on my all time pound for pound list and I have Manny #2 on my all time pound for pound list. I have both higher than Robinson, Armstrong, Leonard and anyone else you could list.
If you think Floyds 50 - 0 is spectacular what about Rocky Marcianos record. Best in the HW division. But Ali was better? why? How can that be? based on your theory with Floyd vs Manny! Sounds a little bias and nuthugging to me.
Record is not the only factor in my ratings, but Floyd not only has the perfect record, but he also defeated an incredible amount of top fighters. I don't think there's a fighter in history that retired undefeated after facing the type of competition Floyd faced.
Manny Pacquiao, Canelo Alvarez, Oscar De La Hoya Miguel Cotto, Shane Mosley, Juan Manuel Marquez, Diego Corrales, Zab Judah, Ricky Hatton, Arturo Gatti, Marcos Maidana twice, Jose Luis Castillo twice, Robert Guerrero, Andre Berto, Victor Ortiz, Carlos Baldomir, Angel Manfredy, Chop Chop Corley, Genaro Hernandez. Just an incredible list of opponents without a loss, draw or no contest.