IMO, I would say Maywweather because he has won 5 World Titles in 6 weight classes. He beat Diego Corrales, JLC twice, Oscar, and Ricky Hatton. Now Hopkins did beat Oscar and Tito, but both fighters had to go up in weight to fight Hopkins. Bot fighters were natural 154 pounders and had to go up in weight. The impessive thing about Hopkins is at the age of 40 or 41, he was able to move up 2 weight divisions and beat "The Man" at LHW, and not only beat him, but dominate him.
hopkins didnt just beat trinidad and oscar, he knocked them out, something no other fighter can say
Yes, that is a good point, but the question isn't who has the better KO's, it's who has the better legacy.
Everybody knew Mayeather was going to win. But people like me wanted to go with the hype(at least last minute) if not why even watch a Mayweather fight when all he does when he dominates is run. If Mayweather ever fights Margarito he is going to lose.
PBF will smash WIde-looping punching Margarito. Margo is too slow and flat footed. He would get shout out.
Damn so now Zab's claim to fame is how he got a bit tipsy against Tzu!???? hahahahaha
Sad career...:banana:
I'm not saying his wins are better, but his resume is.
Margo doesn't deserva a shot at PBF, neve4r did, and never will. A win over Golden Johnson doesn't help. He had better unify the Division which I highly doubt will ever happen.
Predictable: It's all about race when it comes to boxing.
I say: Bring someone for Cotto ngga and stop talking hit about that Crackbaby Judah.
His resume is all about how he was victimized by 90% of the top fighter he faced. How is that a good thing? I say... he washes socks for Baldomir at Rikers..
Besides Judah, Cotto's only other big fight was against Mosley, whereas Zab's biggest fights were against Spinks twice, and Tszyu.