Better legacy Trinidad or De La Hoya??

[jai mari078]

I read everyones comments in this ***** and i cant believe i found so many retarted dumb****s...


Oscar did not LOSE againts Quartey or Withaker...Mostly the ones that say he lost to both of those are haters... It was a close fight which his haters can easily say he lost cause they dont like him.. Oscar won, %99 of you dumbasses prolly didnt even see the fight and listen to other idiots that hate on him...


People forget that Tito a ****ing ***** who low-blowed Vargas everytime he was hurt... IF you've seen the fight youw ould see that Vargas was winning alot round when he was moving but everytime he would stand he would get rocked...And Vargas doesnt got the best chin... Alot of people dont know that Vargas could've beat Tito if he wasnt such a ****ing cheater...


Oscars real losses are Mosley 1 and Hopkins...

Withaker wasnt doing **** but clowing around...

Dont even count sturm cause he couldve gotten his ass beat if Oscar woul've taken him serious... He was out of shape....


Who gots the better legacy? Whos still fighting today?! Oscar!

While Tito is crying like a lil ***** with his daddy about his two losses...

Excellent points!!! You are exactly right about the Quartey and Whittaker fights. They were both close fights which Oscar won. The twelvth round won the Quartey fight, and Whittaker didn't do **** but run around the ring and clown. I also agree with you about the Vargas fight, but in the end he lost so I won't make any excuses. Trinidad did hit him about 5 times low, and when Vargas had him in trouble after the first knockdown, he hit him low agai intentionally to get him off of him. I have to say that the Strum decision was contreversial, but I agree had Oscar been in shape and taken him seriously he would have easily out boxed him, but once again I won't make any excuses and he maybe shouldn't have gotten that decision. I agree that the people that call the Whittaker and Quartey fights contreversial are HATERS!!!!
Your right at least when Oscar loses he doesn't act like a little ***** and retire, just to come back lose again and rtire again like a little *****. I will admit that I am not the biggest Tito fan and never have been but I do respect him as a fighter no matter what my feelings for him are.

[jai mari078]

Held strong my ass. B-Hop almost put Tito to sleep at the end of the 10th with a huge uppercut. And before that, he pounded on him with power shots for round after round, throwing and landing more punches than Tito in every round of the fight. Tito was a KO waiting to happen when he came out for the 12th.

BTW, if you ever see the 'Beyond the Glory' with Bernard Hopkins, one of B-Hop's trainers said DLH was actually the tougher opponent, as he actually had skills (their words, not mine).

Hell, B-Hop beat the fight right out of Tito, which is exactly why he had to go off and sulk like a little girl for 3 years afterward and is sulking now because of the schooling that Winky gave him.

Oh, and to all of you saying that all Oscar did was beat Tito's leftovers with Vargas and Mayorga, that's about as ****ing ****** as saying all Ali did in Manila was beat Foreman's leftover's in Joe Frazier.

Good response!!!

[Del Coqui]

LOL!!! Man, not too long ago Oscar called Tito out repeatedly for clearing up once and for all who the bigger man is. Tito responded and say let's get it on then, **** retirement. Now Oscar is backing up saying negotiations aren't right for him. I think that tells the story.

[Easy-E]

LOL!!! Man, not too long ago Oscar called Tito out repeatedly for clearing up once and for all who the bigger man is. Tito responded and say let's get it on then, **** retirement. Now Oscar is backing up saying negotiations aren't right for him. I think that tells the story.

That tells the story on who has the better leagacy?
Sorry, no.
Again, its Oscar, and easily.

[BigSlick]

DLH, for simply the fact everytime he's fought superior opposition he's made the fights very competative. Tito looks like he just a punching bag

[Del Coqui]

That tells the story on who has the better leagacy?
Sorry, no.
Again, its Oscar, and easily.

It sure does. But before we take this argument any further tell me one thing, how many times have YOU seen Oscar lose, on your own cards, and go back to first DLH fight you've seen?

[Del Coqui]

DLH, for simply the fact everytime he's fought superior opposition he's made the fights very competative. Tito looks like he just a punching bag

Superior competition? Hmmm, like Sturm, Castillejo? Not to mention Trindad leftovers and washed up Campas and washed up JCC.

[Easy-E]

It sure does. But before we take this argument any further tell me one thing, how many times have YOU seen Oscar lose, on your own cards, and go back to first DLH fight you've seen?

I saw him lose 1 fight on the cards, the first Mosley fight.
He beat ike, beat pernell, beat tito and beat mosley the second time.

[Easy-E]

Superior competition? Hmmm, like Sturm, Castillejo? Not to mention Trindad leftovers and washed up Campas and washed up JCC.

That is a pretty weak attempt to discredit one of the best resume's of all time.
Tito's just doesnt even come close.

[Del Coqui]

I saw him lose 1 fight on the cards, the first Mosley fight.
He beat ike, beat pernell, beat tito and beat mosley the second time.

Ain't losing my time arguing with nuthuggers. I'm a Tito and DLH fan, we can talk fights of theirs but from an objective point of view.