Better legacy Trinidad or De La Hoya??
Collapse
-
-
Yeah, Tito only lost twice because he retires like a sulking little ***** after the losses. Sorry, you can't get a better legacy by running away and crying for 3 years (or permanently) after every loss.Comment
-
DLH was more popular and was a better boxer and more skilled, But Tito had better power and stamina and heart. Now to a true boxing fan both of there carreers are pretty much neck and neck. Tito holds the record for the most defenses as a Welter and he basically cleaned out that division. Oscar holds more tiltles in different weight classes, Tito has the controveersial win over DLH and lost one sided fights to Winky and B-hop, but then you can argue DLH's controversial wins, Molina, Whitacker, Quartey, Sturm. When Tito won againts top oposition he won big, DLH on the other hand seemed to barely win or just do enough to get the decesion. Im not sure who has the greater legacy but If you look at it as an ******** on paper DLH does. But as a boxing fan I lean towards Tito.Comment
-
I'm confused, alot of you are saying ODHL never got beat down convincingly. Tito held stong with BHOP until the 12th round, and still got up, while DLH got hit, when down, and stayed down rounds before that. Its awkward the votes are 59-16 in DHL favor, but it seems the people talking are the ones who pick Tito. Come on DLH fans, I want to hear why you think your man is so great?? Call me a hater, but I've alwsy though DLH is way over-rated.Comment
-
You just see Tito crying like a little ***** and retiring eberytime he loses, at least Oscar is big enough to take a loss and come back better and not quit like a ***** when he loses.Comment
-
I'm confused, alot of you are saying ODHL never got beat down convincingly. Tito held stong with BHOP until the 12th round, and still got up, while DLH got hit, when down, and stayed down rounds before that. Its awkward the votes are 59-16 in DHL favor, but it seems the people talking are the ones who pick Tito. Come on DLH fans, I want to hear why you think your man is so great?? Call me a hater, but I've alwsy though DLH is way over-rated.Comment
-
I read everyones comments in this ***** and i cant believe i found so many retarted dumb****s...
Oscar did not LOSE againts Quartey or Withaker...Mostly the ones that say he lost to both of those are haters... It was a close fight which his haters can easily say he lost cause they dont like him.. Oscar won, %99 of you dumbasses prolly didnt even see the fight and listen to other idiots that hate on him...
People forget that Tito a ****ing ***** who low-blowed Vargas everytime he was hurt... IF you've seen the fight youw ould see that Vargas was winning alot round when he was moving but everytime he would stand he would get rocked...And Vargas doesnt got the best chin... Alot of people dont know that Vargas could've beat Tito if he wasnt such a ****ing cheater...
Oscars real losses are Mosley 1 and Hopkins...
Withaker wasnt doing **** but clowing around...
Dont even count sturm cause he couldve gotten his ass beat if Oscar woul've taken him serious... He was out of shape....
Who gots the better legacy? Whos still fighting today?! Oscar!
While Tito is crying like a lil ***** with his daddy about his two losses...Comment
-
DLH was more popular and was a better boxer and more skilled, But Tito had better power and stamina and heart. Now to a true boxing fan both of there carreers are pretty much neck and neck. Tito holds the record for the most defenses as a Welter and he basically cleaned out that division. Oscar holds more tiltles in different weight classes, Tito has the controveersial win over DLH and lost one sided fights to Winky and B-hop, but then you can argue DLH's controversial wins, Molina, Whitacker, Quartey, Sturm. When Tito won againts top oposition he won big, DLH on the other hand seemed to barely win or just do enough to get the decesion. Im not sure who has the greater legacy but If you look at it as an ******** on paper DLH does. But as a boxing fan I lean towards Tito.Comment
-
I'm confused, alot of you are saying ODHL never got beat down convincingly. Tito held stong with BHOP until the 12th round, and still got up, while DLH got hit, when down, and stayed down rounds before that. Its awkward the votes are 59-16 in DHL favor, but it seems the people talking are the ones who pick Tito. Come on DLH fans, I want to hear why you think your man is so great?? Call me a hater, but I've alwsy though DLH is way over-rated.
BTW, if you ever see the 'Beyond the Glory' with Bernard Hopkins, one of B-Hop's trainers said DLH was actually the tougher opponent, as he actually had skills (their words, not mine).
Hell, B-Hop beat the fight right out of Tito, which is exactly why he had to go off and sulk like a little girl for 3 years afterward and is sulking now because of the schooling that Winky gave him.
Oh, and to all of you saying that all Oscar did was beat Tito's leftovers with Vargas and Mayorga, that's about as ****ing ****** as saying all Ali did in Manila was beat Foreman's leftover's in Joe Frazier.Comment
Comment