Was Lennox Lewis a great champion ?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MickyHatton
    PaThFiNdEr
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2005
    • 1611
    • 296
    • 462
    • 11,887

    #131
    It never ceases to amaze me how on this site which is supposed to be about the followers of the sport of boxing discussing boxing that it could be debated that Lewis was or was not a great heavyweight?

    He is easily a top ten heavyweight of all time and in my opinion sits around number 5.

    Lets look at his record first, 41 wins (32 ko's) 2 Losses(both avenged) and 1 dubious draw, of these 19 were for World Titles of which 9 were for the undisputed championship!

    In those fights he beat Holyfield, Tyson, Klitschko, Bruno, McCall, Mercer, Briggs, Golota, Morrison, Tucker, Grant, Tua, Rahman, Akinwande and Ruddock to name the probable best he fought! The only name not there to cement total domination is Bowe but he chose not to fight Lewis!

    Put that against other 'great' champions records:

    Rocky Marciano : Won 49 (43 Ko's) Losses 0, however he only fought for the world title 7 times (Although it was for the undisputed championship) of which he fought Walcott and Charles twice! But he is obviously a great heavyweight!

    Joe Frazier : Won 32 (27 Ko's) Losses 4 and 1 draw, 7 (real) world title fights!

    Sonny Liston : Won 50 (39 ko's) Losses 4, he fought for the world title 4 times(undisputed) but obviously met Ali!

    Larry Holmes : Won 69 (44 Ko's) Losses 6, he fought for a world title 25 times but only twice for the undisputed championship!

    Tunney : Just 3 undisputed World title fights.

    Charles : 9 title fights.

    Tyson : 16 World title fights 9 undisputed.

    Holyfield : 17 World title fights 6 undisputed. 6 more at Cruiserweight.

    Dempsey : 8 World title fights undisputed.

    My point here is that Lewis's record stands up with almost any heavyweight ever with exception to perhaps Ali, Louis and maybe even Foreman due to the longevity of his career.

    I am not detracting from the careers of these great fighters only pointing out that Lewis has to be regarded as one of them!

    Many will argue that it was harder to win a title in the days of Louis and Dempsey and I agree however Lennox Lewis fought many good fighters and a few great ones along the way therefore he has to be regarded a one of the greats!

    For me

    Ali
    Louis
    Foreman
    Dempsey
    Lewis

    Comment

    • hollister
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2004
      • 2442
      • 68
      • 2
      • 10,083

      #132
      Yeah one of those fights is the one where he puts Michael Grant in a headlock and purposely hits him, getting the KO. That's the kind of **** that a champion isn't supposed to do, he had that fight won and he cheated anyway just because Grant kept getting up. He was a great fighter no doubt, but things like that eat at me about him. That's why I say he was a better fighter than he was a champ.

      Comment

      • Bogler
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2005
        • 2347
        • 124
        • 80
        • 9,907

        #133
        Originally posted by MickyHatton
        It never ceases to amaze me how on this site which is supposed to be about the followers of the sport of boxing discussing boxing that it could be debated that Lewis was or was not a great heavyweight?

        He is easily a top ten heavyweight of all time and in my opinion sits around number 5.

        Lets look at his record first, 41 wins (32 ko's) 2 Losses(both avenged) and 1 dubious draw, of these 19 were for World Titles of which 9 were for the undisputed championship!

        In those fights he beat Holyfield, Tyson, Klitschko, Bruno, McCall, Mercer, Briggs, Golota, Morrison, Tucker, Grant, Tua, Rahman, Akinwande and Ruddock to name the probable best he fought! The only name not there to cement total domination is Bowe but he chose not to fight Lewis!

        Put that against other 'great' champions records:

        Rocky Marciano : Won 49 (43 Ko's) Losses 0, however he only fought for the world title 7 times (Although it was for the undisputed championship) of which he fought Walcott and Charles twice! But he is obviously a great heavyweight!

        Joe Frazier : Won 32 (27 Ko's) Losses 4 and 1 draw, 7 (real) world title fights!

        Sonny Liston : Won 50 (39 ko's) Losses 4, he fought for the world title 4 times(undisputed) but obviously met Ali!

        Larry Holmes : Won 69 (44 Ko's) Losses 6, he fought for a world title 25 times but only twice for the undisputed championship!

        Tunney : Just 3 undisputed World title fights.

        Charles : 9 title fights.

        Tyson : 16 World title fights 9 undisputed.

        Holyfield : 17 World title fights 6 undisputed. 6 more at Cruiserweight.

        Dempsey : 8 World title fights undisputed.

        My point here is that Lewis's record stands up with almost any heavyweight ever with exception to perhaps Ali, Louis and maybe even Foreman due to the longevity of his career.

        I am not detracting from the careers of these great fighters only pointing out that Lewis has to be regarded as one of them!

        Many will argue that it was harder to win a title in the days of Louis and Dempsey and I agree however Lennox Lewis fought many good fighters and a few great ones along the way therefore he has to be regarded a one of the greats!

        For me

        Ali
        Louis
        Foreman
        Dempsey
        Lewis
        It's not just about boxing records, coz if it is, it'll be easy, just run these thru a computer and let it do the work. there are a lot of strong intangible arguments that boxing experts can put up to push other heavies ahead of him in the top 10 easily. but i agree though that he is one of the great champs.
        Last edited by Bogler; 08-29-2006, 01:29 PM.

        Comment

        • ejk22
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Sep 2004
          • 1354
          • 50
          • 20
          • 7,520

          #134
          This is the type of **** I hated about Lewis. He cheated alot in his fights however no one was willing to point it out. He held and hit his opponents all the time but knew how to get away with it. Just look at this following video footage.


          Comment

          • AlexMc2
            Amateur
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Aug 2006
            • 6
            • 3
            • 0
            • 6,319

            #135
            Originally posted by ejk22
            This is the type of **** I hated about Lewis. He cheated alot in his fights however no one was willing to point it out. He held and hit his opponents all the time but knew how to get away with it. Just look at this following video footage.


            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IddW8E4jYqU
            I think that grabbing is really common practice in boxing, it just raises eyebrows when the fighter that won did it. Im sure you wouldn't have notice it if Grant had won. It could be worse, I mean some fighters bite peoples ear off and are regarded by some THE GREATEST EVER!!!

            Comment

            • shellroc513
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Sep 2005
              • 229
              • 28
              • 33
              • 6,527

              #136
              Hey raymaond 123 Jones was not boring hence all the ppv buys idiot, Hopkins I can give u, and Sweet pea have a grace in his style LL could never of had. U think people want to watch the hwc to learn the science or to see him knock ppl out. u be thew judge. Secondly I started the poll because someone suggested it if u readd the first entry, I was curious about the results. U don't have to jump on my sh t when, u have to facts. Sweet pea boring, ur on crack

              Comment

              • hollister
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2004
                • 2442
                • 68
                • 2
                • 10,083

                #137
                Originally posted by AlexMc2
                I think that grabbing is really common practice in boxing, it just raises eyebrows when the fighter that won did it. Im sure you wouldn't have notice it if Grant had won. It could be worse, I mean some fighters bite peoples ear off and are regarded by some THE GREATEST EVER!!!
                Yeah you're right, there are worse than Lennox, and I would have noticed it but I would have been saying "that's right *****, grab him again" lol
                To me it just adds insult to injury when a fighter has another fighter essentially out on his feet and then does something like that. Tyson fans are some of the worst though because they'll pretty much excuse anything he does or ignore it in order to preach about his so-called greatness lol

                Comment

                • MickyHatton
                  PaThFiNdEr
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Nov 2005
                  • 1611
                  • 296
                  • 462
                  • 11,887

                  #138
                  Originally posted by Bogler
                  It's not just about boxing records, coz if it is, it'll be easy, just run these thru a computer and let it do the work. there are a lot of strong intangible arguments that boxing experts can put up to push other heavies ahead of him in the top 10 easily. but i agree though that he is one of the great champs.
                  You missed the point my friend, I named Lewis's 'best' opponents and record patched that against his lengthy reign as champion/undisputed champ.

                  My point being that if he fought through 19 world title fights against some very good opponents then this alone should mark him as one of the greats, then look at the likes of Marciano who was indeed a great yet in reality his record looks no better to me than Lewis's, in some respects it looks worse (in some it looks better i.e. no losses)

                  I am convinced that if Lewis was American or if he was a brighter personality he would then get the credit he so obviously deserves!
                  To me however I would rather Lewis be judged on his boxing ability!

                  Comment

                  • AlexMc2
                    Amateur
                    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 6
                    • 3
                    • 0
                    • 6,319

                    #139
                    Originally posted by hollister
                    Yeah you're right, there are worse than Lennox, and I would have noticed it but I would have been saying "that's right *****, grab him again" lol
                    To me it just adds insult to injury when a fighter has another fighter essentially out on his feet and then does something like that. Tyson fans are some of the worst though because they'll pretty much excuse anything he does or ignore it in order to preach about his so-called greatness lol

                    lol... I agree with you about knocking a man when he is down and i add to the comment that many other factors are important to take into account when talking about the greatest ever. Example Ali once fought a british boxer named Henry Cooper in 1963. Cooper knocked Ali down on the forth round but the bell rang before he could finish him off also when the fight was due to start again they had to get a new glove for Ali giving him time to recover. Maybe the story would have been different for both Ali ( Im not saying he wasn't the greatest) and Cooper who never manage to make it big and was a good fighter.

                    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Cooper_(boxer)... this is a good link to read if you wanna comfirm my comment!!

                    Comment

                    • The Noose
                      AKA Bologna Panini
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Aug 2004
                      • 12082
                      • 1,040
                      • 826
                      • 44,455

                      #140
                      Originally posted by AlexMc2
                      lol... I agree with you about knocking a man when he is down and i add to the comment that many other factors are important to take into account when talking about the greatest ever. Example Ali once fought a british boxer named Henry Cooper in 1963. Cooper knocked Ali down on the forth round but the bell rang before he could finish him off also when the fight was due to start again they had to get a new glove for Ali giving him time to recover. Maybe the story would have been different for both Ali ( Im not saying he wasn't the greatest) and Cooper who never manage to make it big and was a good fighter.

                      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Cooper_(boxer)... this is a good link to read if you wanna comfirm my comment!!
                      If Ali lost to Cooper, it wouldnt have made any difference. He would of still fought for the title, maybe a little later than he did, but apart from that nothing else would of changed.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP