Comments Thread For: Lomachenko on Loss To Lopez: Nothing Honest About The Judging, It's About Being Bribed

[DeeMoney]

It will always determine the measure of a man by how he handles his first loss.

Deontay Wilder and Donald Trump are PRIME examples of that.

This is a shame Loma but I'm not surprised. These guys that have everything going their way and start drinking their own bathwater. When there's a hiccup, they fall to pieces.

Phuck you Loma.You were given a pass and proclaimed as a world beater and the best after what? Less than a handful of fights?

GTFOH!

To be fair, this isnt his first loss

[BoxingIsGreat]

Yes they should. Either Loma knows exactly what’s up and he should say it, or he shouldn’t say something like that.

I think he should be careful. I can see Arum coming back hard at him, like he did Bud, or even worse. He definitely shouldn't say such thing to the whole world. Whoever is advising him is a POS.

[Calibaloc]

I'm satisfied with lopez clearly winning.. was tired of these Europeans being embraced and exalted over our own countrymen, simply because of skin color. Loss to an American with brown skin no less.

Absolutely. Say it again louder for the people in the back!

[BoxingIsGreat]

I'm satisfied with lopez clearly winning.. was tired of these Europeans being embraced and exalted over our own countrymen, simply because of skin color. Loss to an American with brown skin no less.

Green K for the truth.

[Divine Hammer]

I'm satisfied with lopez clearly winning.. was tired of these Europeans being embraced and exalted over our own countrymen, simply because of skin color. Loss to an American with brown skin no less.

only way to win is by gift decision. disgusting.

[RoadMan94]

Wow, 1st Usyk with his accusations of Chisora and Matchroom over the Gloves and Ring Size Etc, now Loma is saying he lost over bribery?!

Think the scorecards was extremely harsh on Vasyl.
Really hoped he was gonna atleast acknowledge he should of done a lot more in early rounds.

All fighters want excuses when losing though, I suppose that’s the times we are in now. People need to HUMBLE Themselves.

[sicko]

Most of you have never been in a fight in your lives. Excuses at championship level are hyper common. When training to this level and giving your life to your creed, its hard to just suck up devastating losses. Winners tend to be winners because they're bad at losing, unlike most people who never really go on to achieve anything meaningful in their lives nor do they enjoy any kind of success.

Complete BULLSH^T! Nice Try Though But No!

Success People Fail Repeatedly before they become Successful and if they made excuses after Failing in the past then guess what? They Would've never worked hard to finally Achieve the Success that they so desire.

AJ suffered Defeat, embarrassing Defeat...


No Excuses! Despite his fans worked overtime to make excuse for him. Instead he just worked harder and came back now a SMARTER FIGHTER and got his Belts Back

[RoadMan94]

Absolutely. Say it again louder for the people in the back!

Ridiculous. Black FANS try to make fights about race far too often. Just like when Jake Paul knocked out Nate Robinson. Had guys who never even fought calling out Paul, all for the “Culture” apparently.

I say fans, because that’s who it is that racebait. Far more than fighters ever do. Apart from Wilder maybe.

Most fans who are real Boxing fans, appreciate the effort given by many fighters of African American heritage. Guys who are active today, and legends of the past. Not just boxing either In all sports I can think of, black athletes have been AMAZING.

SICK TO DEATH OF THIS BS.

[ippo]

Their was no bribery, he lost the fight pretty clearly. He lost what the first 6 rounds by doing absolutely nothing. If I was lopez I wouldn't being giving him a rematch after him saying things like that.

[alexjust]

I thought the could’ve been a Draw. I said it before, BUT the margin of error leans to the judges and that Lopez edged it. Therefore, Lopez won.

For any Loma fans to think otherwise explains the dogmatic nature of Canelo haters saying GGG “clearly won” in the first fight. These actions prove that and the fans response.

In other words, Canelo did not fight like Loma did in the GGg fight. Canelo made sure his output and put selection MATTERED for the judges. Canelo haters and GGG diehards will never acknowledge that. I even said Canelo vs GGG Draw was justified because of the nature of the cards and the performance, but fans get so emotional they cry “robbery.”

Not even Smith vs Ryder was a robbery. It was CLOSE, and one would favor Ryder’s hard work, sure, but a robbery are scorecards where all judges have it wide for the other...

It surprises me how many vets on this site claim to know boxing but don’t acknowledging it. Rarely do you get posters justify round by round study and instead they just say “ringside said so.” Protagonist vs antagonist themes ruin fights. Canelo haters and many of industry whom had grudges against against put it on Canelo and have made him an antagonist for years...

Its a nice theory and all, but the reality is that when Byrd scored their fight at 118-110 - it showed gross incompetence and therefore you can't rely on judging as a credible adjudication because the judging panel was effectively incomplete. What "diehard" GGG fans are more concerned about is the trend of close rounds going to a marketing star of boxing. Which now happens to be Canelo. That is the problem. And to me this is a problem even when GGG gets the edge from the judges in his fight with Dervy. The scoring must be fair - period. If GGG drawed Dervy - let the scores show that. If he lost - let the scores show that too.