Joe Calzaghe's 46-0 vs Floyd Mayweather's 50-0

[coghaugen]

Canelo was at his best 154 to 175 but not at his best when he fought at 152

150 wasn't it? Hardly any 168

[coghaugen]

I do kind of think Floyd had a good win over Cotto. That's about it.

Calzaghe had sensational wins over Eubank and Hopkins, and a performance to match Corrales/Gatti (Lacy).

[Smash]

- -U should be Mush.

hhhhhmmm mush

[hugh grant]

Floyd's win over Pacquiao is better than ANYONE on Calzaghe's resume.

It's good you recognise Pac s greatness but he was a former flyweight and too much controversy in that win to think it has too much relevance. JC did beat former heavyweight champ
I think f loyds greater. Wherever JC is all time, Floyd should be a few places higher at the very least.
So if jc is no50 all time, let Floyd be 45 at the very least. There won't be much distance between them so it's in Floyd s best interest jc is rated highly historically.
I think jc beats anyone on Floyd s resume. He'd beat someone as small as pac and as green as nel o with cw

[bluebeam]

I do kind of think Floyd had a good win over Cotto. That's about it.

Calzaghe had sensational wins over Eubank and Hopkins, and a performance to match Corrales/Gatti (Lacy).

Pacquiao is still champion 5 years later after floyd beat him.

Joe has no pacquio on his resume

[hugh grant]

Pacquiao is still champion 5 years later after floyd beat him.

Joe has no pacquio on his resume

Floyd s win over pac is so controversial to be a good win.
Joe's win over bh is as good. Bh is a big rival of Floyd s of who is actually better of the 2. Joe beat bh in bh backyard.

[Larry the boss]

I do kind of think Floyd had a good win over Cotto. That's about it.

Calzaghe had sensational wins over Eubank and Hopkins, and a performance to match Corrales/Gatti (Lacy).

lmfao.....

Cotto
corrales
castillo
cotto
canelo
oscar
pacquiao
mosley
judah
Genero


you have to be trolling!!!!

[Larry the boss]

Floyd s win over pac is so controversial to be a good win.
Joe's win over bh is as good. Bh is a big rival of Floyd s of who is actually better of the 2. Joe beat bh in bh backyard.

Hopkins dropped Joe and was over 40 and lost a close split decision

Floyd dominated Many and won a wide UD..

how in the hell is floyds win controversial but not Joes???

ya'll make 0 sense, it is hilarious

and how is Hopkins a rival to floyd??? HOW??

[hugh grant]

Hopkins dropped Joe and was over 40 and lost a close split decision

Floyd dominated Many and won a wide UD..

how in the hell is floyds win controversial but not Joes???

ya'll make 0 sense, it is hilarious

and how is Hopkins a rival to floyd??? HOW??

We know bh can fight at 40s as he started late.
Floyds IV and pac s bad shkulder, all floyd needed to clear things up was a rematch.
But your too much of a Floyd
fanboy to need to ask why it's controversial?
If Floyd s win over pac is better than anything on Joe's resume, so it must also mean horns win over pac and bradley win over Pac is possibly better than anything Joe's did?
But we know things aren't as black and white as that. Just because Pac s got the bestbresume?
Pac is a former flyweight so you won't get as much credit beating pac as much as pac gets beating WWs himself, a weight which naturally isn't his.

[Kezzer]

Both ducked and dived a lot really, but mayweather generally had transparency in his reasons - namely money and ultimately he kind of fought everybody

Calzaghe for me I’ll never be able to fully credit when he refused to fight froch - I’m still convinced to this day he saw the fight as too big of a risk.