Comments Thread For: The 2010s in the Rankings: The Top Twenty of the Decade - #5-1

[Fire4231]

Stopped reading here! Lol

I’m just assuming your affiliation with Crack’inside’Wraps Boxing Association didn’t impress Cliff. I didn’t say a “job” here at BoxingScene, but somewhere in industry that one time you were mingling with PBC associates looking directly at Rold at a Canelo event... you be like: “I funna gang up in dis trick for shredding my resume once upon a time...never introduced me to Ring Mag peeps either... I funna be gangsta now...”. You didn’t even thank Ring Mag for them sammmiches either. Shame on you

That time.

Lol... Oh that Young Bidness, he such a defender of boxing truth and journalistic integrity.

Haven’t seen a hero this ineffective with words since the legendary Pootie Tang!!! Keep using gibberish to slay the PBC Dragon. The boxing establishments arse hole runnith dry.

Young Bidness is gracious enough to tell us he stopped reading but by the way he writes many of us suspect he never started reading.

But even with lightning streams of the purest gibberish, Young Bidness meets his kryptonite.

Why....Because he can’t find the words to explain how fighter A:

- outsells fighter B
- has greater wins than fighter B
- moved up in more weight classes than fighter B
- was undefeated unlike fighter B
- Had less close decisions and controversial wins than fighter B
- fought better names than fighter B
- Fought more Hall of Famers than fighter B
- Whooped fighter B’s @ss clean head to head (when fighter B had a significant age and weight advantage.)

Yet some how fighter B is ranked over Fighter A??? How can this be Young Bidness? However could it ever be?

[Thuglife Nelo]

Lol... Oh that Young Bidness, he such a defender of boxing truth and journalistic integrity.

Haven’t seen a hero this ineffective with words since the legendary Pootie Tang!!! Keep using gibberish to slay the PBC Dragon. The boxing establishments arse hole runnith dry.

Young Bidness is gracious enough to tell us he stopped reading but by the way he writes many of us suspect he never started reading.

But even with lightning streams of the purest gibberish, Young Bidness meets his kryptonite.

Why....Because he can’t find the words to explain how fighter A:

- outsells fighter B
- has greater wins than fighter B
- moved up in more weight classes than fighter B
- was undefeated unlike fighter B
- Had less close decisions and controversial wins than fighter B
- fought better names than fighter B
- Fought more Hall of Famers than fighter B
- Whooped fighter B’s @ss clean head to head (when fighter B had a significant age and weight advantage.)

Yet some how fighter B is ranked over Fighter A??? How can this be Young Bidness? However could it ever be?

Bruh. Eddie Hearn could buy a whole city block from the slums of Detroit with a free yearly subscription to DAZN and make lives happy for everyone! Yet You’d still be outside protesting against Hearn and crying over Cliff’s bidness! Get Widdit! It’s a DAZN world! Partnah!

[DeeMoney]

Sad but looked at the guys he fought ranked when the division was dog sht to now? I mean Sergiy is #6 and look at the guys that were ranked high than that he fought at the time...Most wouldn’t even be top 10 at MW right now.

Possibly, but numbers don’t lie.

[ruedboy]

" Only five fighters appeared in all 3 top tens, Mayweather, Pac, Ward, Golovkin and Crawford".

[Fire4231]

Bruh. Eddie Hearn could buy a whole city block from the slums of Detroit with a free yearly subscription to DAZN and make lives happy for everyone! Yet You’d still be outside protesting against Hearn and crying over Cliff’s bidness! Get Widdit! It’s a DAZN world! Partnah!

WTF- Is that what Eddie promised you bro?

Lol... oh so thats why you on here DAZN ****ing kiddo, it’s all for the Eddie Hearn subscription hookup?

Bro all Eddie has to do to win US fans over is put on “some,” fights we all want to see.

Real boxing fans don’t like to mis a match, but it becomes easier to miss them when non of the fights are actually meaningful.

But you are feeling good paying for mismatches and you tube grudge matches? Bro that’s okay. Good for you guy please enjoy.

But here is the bad part, it doesn’t bother me any and I am going to call out BS when I want too partnah.

You bro are just going to have to live with it because you getting clowned by me doesn’t help your cause. It just makes you the object of ridicule.

Thanks for bringing more attention to my post Young Bidness. I was just going to drop it an walk away because it is one persons opinion that has already been contradicted by every top writer in the sport.

But thanks to you, it’s all over the thread. What else you want to say without really saying anything clown for hire?

[Fire4231]

No response to this...

But even with lightning streams of the purest gibberish, Young Bidness meets his kryptonite.

Why....Because he can’t find the words to explain how fighter A:

- outsells fighter B
- has greater wins than fighter B
- moved up in more weight classes than fighter B
- was undefeated unlike fighter B
- Had less close decisions and controversial wins than fighter B
- fought better names than fighter B
- Fought more Hall of Famers than fighter B
- Whooped fighter B’s @ss clean head to head (when fighter B had a significant age and weight advantage.)

Yet some how fighter B is ranked over Fighter A??? How can this be Young Bidness? However could it ever be?

[Thuglife Nelo]

WTF- Is that what Eddie promised you bro?

Lol... oh so thats why you on here DAZN ****ing kiddo, it’s all for the Eddie Hearn subscription hookup?

Bro all Eddie has to do to win US fans over is put on “some,” fights we all want to see.

Real boxing fans don’t like to mis a match, but it becomes easier to miss them when non of the fights are actually meaningful.

But you are feeling good paying for mismatches and you tube grudge matches? Bro that’s okay. Good for you guy please enjoy.

But here is the bad part, it doesn’t bother me any and I am going to call out BS when I want too partnah.

You bro are just going to have to live with it because you getting clowned by me doesn’t help your cause. It just makes you the object of ridicule.

Thanks for bringing more attention to my post Young Bidness. I was just going to drop it an walk away because it is one persons opinion that has already been contradicted by every top writer in the sport.

But thanks to you, it’s all over the thread. What else you want to say without really saying anything clown for hire?

You ain’t clowning no one bruh. It’s Cliff’s spliff, not yo crackspace! I’ll tell Hearn to send you and your family a postcard of Canelo, signed, “Everything funna be aight, bruh! -Eddie”

[kushking]

When you take Canelos top wins this decade & the moment they were in & circumstances,he deserves FOTD over Floyd who fought half the decade & has 2 great wins this decade in manny & Canelo but Canelo was clearly not at his best in many regards(the weights the only regard that matters to me,if he wasn't drained I wouldn't consider Canelos age as an excuse,I asterisk that win solely off weightdraining someone who made clear they would be drained & outgrew ability to make 152,& being drained made a green Canelo fight with terrible timing)

Floyd took away Canelos main strength by draining him then bragged about it.

But when Floyds judged equally to Canelo he doesn't match canelos decade,its crazy to me that anyone doesn't see this was Canelos decade,last decade was Floyds. When judged as Canelo is judged Mayweathers fights go like this

Maidana 1-2,Pac= "Close 50/50 fights that floyd fought like 30 secs a rd"(like when they say that about Canelo v ggg) or that Lara,Trout don't count(despite it being clear wins in all 3 except 1st ggg fight where a draw was correct)

Ortiz=Sucker punched asterisk win.

Guerrero\Berto="a bum" they would say if Canelo fought that level.

It sucks when ppl discredit fighters wins but if applied the way they do Canelo thats what Floyd's wins equal

[HandsofIron]

Ths list lost some cred when overrated Martinez was placed on it.

[The Big Dunn]

When you take Canelos top wins this decade & the moment they were in & circumstances,he deserves FOTD over Floyd who fought half the decade & has 2 great wins this decade in manny & Canelo but Canelo was clearly not at his best in many regards(the weights the only regard that matters to me,if he wasn't drained I wouldn't consider Canelos age as an excuse,I asterisk that win solely off weightdraining someone who made clear they would be drained & outgrew ability to make 152,& being drained made a green Canelo fight with terrible timing)

Floyd took away Canelos main strength by draining him then bragged about it.

But when Floyds judged equally to Canelo he doesn't match canelos decade,its crazy to me that anyone doesn't see this was Canelos decade,last decade was Floyds. When judged as Canelo is judged Mayweathers fights go like this

Maidana 1-2,Pac= "Close 50/50 fights that floyd fought like 30 secs a rd"(like when they say that about Canelo v ggg) or that Lara,Trout don't count(despite it being clear wins in all 3 except 1st ggg fight where a draw was correct)

Ortiz=Sucker punched asterisk win.

Guerrero\Berto="a bum" they would say if Canelo fought that level.

It sucks when ppl discredit fighters wins but if applied the way they do Canelo thats what Floyd's wins equal

Are people allowed to use Canelo's SD win over Lara that many felt was a loss or put an asterisk by the open scoring UD over Trout that many though Trout was winning when the score was announced , which then changed how Trout fought the last 3-4 rounds?

If you want to be fair, be fair about all controversies, not just the ones that you can use to support your point.