Lineal Heavyweight title is "bull****"?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Marchegiano
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Aug 2010
    • 12208
    • 1,790
    • 2,307
    • 165,288

    #51
    Originally posted by aboutfkntime
    no WBO... ?

    not sure if the WBO even existed back then

    nobody is going to rank Spinks over Tyson... so, how meaningful is lineal?

    how does that not prove my point entirely... ?

    who remembers that lineal champ... ?

    where does he rank in history... ?

    how did being lineal champ help Spinks when he got in there with a REAL champ?

    the " lineal " champ... it just a fan concoction, born from frustration at having multiple sanctioning bodies... and it was supposed to be based around being undisputed

    I just don't see it has any value or meaning whatsoever

    it is literally a fan award... a paper title... a paper title that is OFTEN disputed, because nobody can agree on when lineage started/stopped whatever...

    who settles disputes between world-wide boxing fans... ?

    currently, nobody can agree on whether Fury is the lineal champ

    how come you still refer to Spinks as a lineal champ today, despite the fact that he got DESTROYED by Tyson... and yet many boxing fans refuse to recognize Tyson Fury as lineal champ, despite the fact that Fury is undefeated?

    see what I mean... ?

    it just means absolutely nothing to me

    the following has never changed...

    a lineal " champ "... could, be the best guy in his division... or, he may not be... and OFTEN, he is not... as your example proved

    same as P4P... over-rated, and largely irrelevant

    plenty of P4P fighters lost to guys who were not P4P fighters
    This post is probably going to go underappreciated but it is a good one.


    lineal = undisputed maybe a bit semantical but no not really. It's just the title without the bodies' control. The original guys, like Sullivan, were very much disputed.

    This ties in with the bold.

    Fans have never agreed, we call Sullivan champion because most, not all, agreed he was. There were competing champions of his era.

    Funny enough, you know, p4p is also just some fan made-up bull**** that's lost its way and has nothing to do with its original meaning too.

    The first p4p is NP Dempsey, also of Sully's era. Dempsey was a MW and it was said of him if not for size he'd be the HW champion. So they started calling him p4p.

    Just like lineal, p4p used to transfer when a man beat the man. That lasted until Bob Fitzsimmons became the next p4p and lost to Jeffries because Jeffries needed no extra accolade about if weight made no difference. So p4p took on a new meaning.


    finally, the bodies came in for a reason, people wanted them around at first. Most of who we call lineal or would call lineal had never ever heard of the idea of lineal and are given lineal status posthumously. Marciano is definitely a lineal but Marciano doesn't know that. So even the historical perspective is muddied by fan opinion and misconception.

    Sullivan's era gives no ****s about ranks. Guys who fight for the title are picked as worthy challengers by the champ himself. Guys who fight for vacant titles were picked by the champ going into retirement himself. rank 1 and 2 fighting one another doesn't have anything to do with Sullivan's era. But, many believe that's how lineal is passed after a retirement BECAUSE no one was talking about lineal when Tunney or Marciano retired or when Ali was stripped. So to justify their passing the lineage on fans had to come up with a reason decades after the fact. That reason has more to do with sanctioning body culture than a title w/o bodies or a title reflective of Sully's era.


    Good post bud.


    Edit- Dumbass me, I forgot to pose the question that inspired me to respond in the first place. Did Sullivan become HW champion when he beat Paddy Ryan in 1882, Dominick McCaffrey in 1885, or Jake Kilrain in 1889? Sullivan's own inauguration is debatable.
    Last edited by Marchegiano; 01-15-2020, 07:55 AM.

    Comment

    • N/A
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jul 2017
      • 9269
      • 214
      • 0
      • 12

      #52
      Originally posted by aboutfkntime
      what a load of bullshlt
      It's easily verifiable public information. So if you think it's bull****, there's something seriously wrong with you. It was widely reported at the time.

      I have no obligation to discuss Canelo, which has nothing to do with what we're talking about.

      Comment

      • Larry the boss
        EDUCATED
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2011
        • 90798
        • 6,419
        • 4,473
        • 2,500,480

        #53
        Originally posted by aboutfkntime
        no WBO... ?

        not sure if the WBO even existed back then

        nobody is going to rank Spinks over Tyson... so, how meaningful is lineal?

        how does that not prove my point entirely... ?

        who remembers that lineal champ... ?

        where does he rank in history... ?

        how did being lineal champ help Spinks when he got in there with a REAL champ?

        the " lineal " champ... it just a fan concoction, born from frustration at having multiple sanctioning bodies... and it was supposed to be based around being undisputed

        I just don't see it has any value or meaning whatsoever

        it is literally a fan award... a paper title... a paper title that is OFTEN disputed, because nobody can agree on when lineage started/stopped whatever...

        who settles disputes between world-wide boxing fans... ?

        currently, nobody can agree on whether Fury is the lineal champ

        how come you still refer to Spinks as a lineal champ today, despite the fact that he got DESTROYED by Tyson... and yet many boxing fans refuse to recognize Tyson Fury as lineal champ, despite the fact that Fury is undefeated?

        see what I mean... ?

        it just means absolutely nothing to me

        the following has never changed...

        a lineal " champ "... could, be the best guy in his division... or, he may not be... and OFTEN, he is not... as your example proved

        same as P4P... over-rated, and largely irrelevant

        plenty of P4P fighters lost to guys who were not P4P fighters
        There wa sno WBO..The WBO just got recognized maybe 15 years ago..and Spinks was THE REAL CHAMP..He beat Holmes WHO WAS THE REAL CHAMP...That is how lineage works

        Comment

        • Boxing Goat
          The G.O.A.T.
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Aug 2013
          • 13150
          • 557
          • 1,027
          • 128,865

          #54
          Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
          Duva is lying, as always.

          https://www.boxing247.com/press-boxi...on-day-3/37055

          December 17, 2014, Duva requests that the Pascal-Kovalev winner be made Stevenson's mandatory, with a 50/50 split. The WBC approved the unusual request and Stevenson agreed to participate in the fight.


          It appears to be a mere formality, but Sergey Kovalev’s representatives and HBO Sports executives must come to terms on a new contract if the undefeated light heavyweight champion is to continue fighting exclusively on that premium cable channel. The multi-fight contract Kovalev signed with HBO several days before beating Cedric Agnew last March 29 in Atlantic City expired following Kovalev’s impressive eighth-round technical knockout win over Quebec’s Jean Pascal (29-3-1, 17 KOs, 1 NC) on Saturday night in Montreal. Main Events chief executive officer Kathy Duva, whose company promotes Kovalev (27-0-1, 24 KOs), has been discussing a new contract with HBO Sports brass and fully expects the network’s successful partnership with the Russian knockout artist to continue.


          The multi-fight contract Kovalev signed with HBO several days before beating Cedric Agnew last March 29 in Atlantic City expired following Kovalev’s impressive eighth-round technical knockout win over Quebec’s Jean Pascal (29-3-1, 17 KOs, 1 NC) on Saturday night in Montreal.


          So Duva requests the fight, the WBC & Stevenson say okay. Kovalev beats Pascal to become mandatory, AND TO BECOME A TELEVISION FREE AGENT.


          Does Kovalev fight Stevenson though? No. Instead, he purposely signs a new TV deal that blocks him from fighting Stevenson. A blatant duck. Then Duva lies about why they can't fight Stevenson, hoping the public won't realize Kovalev became a television free agent when he became mandatory.
          Even if he wasn't exactly signed into a contract at that exact time is irrelevant. Who is to say that they were not negotiating? And, who would you go with at that time? HBO or Haymon? C'mon, you know HBO was the best broadcaster with the most money at the time. That's a no brainer.

          Again, do us a favor and show your maturity and never speak about Kovalev being fearful ever again. He was calling out Stevenson for a long time and there's no doubt that he would have fought him anytime. Didn't want the fight my ass

          Comment

          • aboutfkntime
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2015
            • 47370
            • 1,631
            • 3,563
            • 391,308

            #55
            Originally posted by W1LL
            That is fine, I wouldn't expect anything more from a millenial.


            I am not a millennial... so, stop crying bltch !

            how did any of the dribble you wrote highlight the value of lineage?

            tell us what value recognizing lineage adds to boxing... ?

            how about you tell me what value there is... in Shannon Briggs beating 50 year old George Foreman to become the lineal heavyweight "champ"... when there were NO titles at stake, and Briggs was IMMEDIATELY destroyed by Lennox Lewis

            why is that worthy of addition into the record books?... or even noteworthy at all?

            lineage did not help Spinks, who was not the best in his division...

            it did not help Briggs, who was not the best in his division...

            it did not help Stevenson, who was not the best in his division...

            and it did not help Canelo, who was n... no, wait... forget that last bit

            is that you Shannon... ?

            LETS GO CHAMP !!



            Boxing has a long and storied history, and you cannot, nor can any other modern-day casual, snowflake "fan" just disregard that history. You can deny it and have meltdowns about it, like your generation does about anything they can't understand, or that makes them uncomfortable. It might mean nothing to you, because you don't know chit about boxing. But for those who know, the Lineal title is serious business. Your opinion means chit, you are a drop in the ocean of morons who think they're current, edgy, smart-ass, etc. The Lineal titles of Boxing predate you by over 100 years; they were here long before you, and they will be here long after you. But go ahead and carry on acting like a teenager going through puberty.


            it does not you doorknob

            the concept of refusing to recognize the official sanctioned champion in favor of DIRECT lineage... was started by idiot casual fans like you, in the 1970's...

            it does NOT go back to Sullivan... stop talking rubbish

            you are confusing lineage, with the concept of solely recognizing the lineal "champ"

            I agree that boxing history is incredibly valuable, and I refer to it constantly

            here...

            The concept of a lineal champion was developed by boxing fans dissatisfied by the tendency of each of the various sanctioning bodies (WBC, WBA, IBF, etc.) to recognize different champions, and in particular to strip a champion of his title for refusing to fight its top-ranked contender. Prior to the 1970s, this rarely happened...

            The lineal champion is not necessarily the boxer viewed as the best.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lineal_championship

            genius, the lineal championship was invented by millennials

            TBRB has been around for less time than my dog, and my dog is not even old LMAO

            you are confusing boxing lineage, with the concept of recognizing a lineal "championship"

            boxing lineage, I 100% agree with you... a lineal "championship", forget it

            who the fk would let idiot casual fans decide anything ? ... their decision to start handing around paper titles did not help you become less confused, did it?

            Comment

            • aboutfkntime
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2015
              • 47370
              • 1,631
              • 3,563
              • 391,308

              #56
              Originally posted by Marchegiano
              This post is probably going to go underappreciated but it is a good one.


              lineal = undisputed maybe a bit semantical but no not really. It's just the title without the bodies' control. The original guys, like Sullivan, were very much disputed.

              This ties in with the bold.

              Fans have never agreed, we call Sullivan champion because most, not all, agreed he was. There were competing champions of his era.

              Funny enough, you know, p4p is also just some fan made-up bull**** that's lost its way and has nothing to do with its original meaning too.

              The first p4p is NP Dempsey, also of Sully's era. Dempsey was a MW and it was said of him if not for size he'd be the HW champion. So they started calling him p4p.

              Just like lineal, p4p used to transfer when a man beat the man. That lasted until Bob Fitzsimmons became the next p4p and lost to Jeffries because Jeffries needed no extra accolade about if weight made no difference. So p4p took on a new meaning.


              finally, the bodies came in for a reason, people wanted them around at first. Most of who we call lineal or would call lineal had never ever heard of the idea of lineal and are given lineal status posthumously. Marciano is definitely a lineal but Marciano doesn't know that. So even the historical perspective is muddied by fan opinion and misconception.

              Sullivan's era gives no ****s about ranks. Guys who fight for the title are picked as worthy challengers by the champ himself. Guys who fight for vacant titles were picked by the champ going into retirement himself. rank 1 and 2 fighting one another doesn't have anything to do with Sullivan's era. But, many believe that's how lineal is passed after a retirement BECAUSE no one was talking about lineal when Tunney or Marciano retired or when Ali was stripped. So to justify their passing the lineage on fans had to come up with a reason decades after the fact. That reason has more to do with sanctioning body culture than a title w/o bodies or a title reflective of Sully's era.


              Good post bud.


              Edit- Dumbass me, I forgot to pose the question that inspired me to respond in the first place. Did Sullivan become HW champion when he beat Paddy Ryan in 1882, Dominick McCaffrey in 1885, or Jake Kilrain in 1889? Sullivan's own inauguration is debatable.




              boxing lineage... is more important than anything else

              a lineal " championship "... has no real relevance at all

              FACT: anything important that happens with the recently invented lineal "championship" ... will always be recognized and recorded by boxing historians anyway

              the lineal " championship "... is just a fan concept

              like those big hand things that idiots wave around

              Last edited by aboutfkntime; 01-15-2020, 02:21 PM.

              Comment

              • aboutfkntime
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2015
                • 47370
                • 1,631
                • 3,563
                • 391,308

                #57
                Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                It's easily verifiable public information. So if you think it's bull****, there's something seriously wrong with you. It was widely reported at the time.

                I have no obligation to discuss Canelo, which has nothing to do with what we're talking about.


                oh, shlt... you just ran out the back door


                Canelo was ranked the #1 middleweight on the planet because of lineage... which is ABSOLUTELY ABSURD... because he had never faced a middleweight opponent, and he had never weighed more than 155

                Comment

                • W1LL
                  Celtic Warrior
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2004
                  • 11851
                  • 845
                  • 916
                  • 71,119

                  #58
                  Originally posted by aboutfkntime
                  it does not you doorknob

                  the concept of refusing to recognize the official sanctioned champion in favor of DIRECT lineage... was started by idiot casual fans like you, in the 1970's...

                  it does NOT go back to Sullivan... stop talking rubbish
                  What do you mean, it doesn't go back to Sullivan? Sullivan is recognised as the first Lineal Heavyweight champion. That is fact. You can't just cry about facts and pretend that they aren't real. Sullivan reigned in the late 19th century. Assuming you were born after the millenium, that would make my statement that the Lineal predates you by over 100 years correct.

                  Comment

                  • aboutfkntime
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2015
                    • 47370
                    • 1,631
                    • 3,563
                    • 391,308

                    #59
                    Originally posted by Galactic Larry
                    There wa sno WBO..The WBO just got recognized maybe 15 years ago..and Spinks was THE REAL CHAMP..He beat Holmes WHO WAS THE REAL CHAMP...That is how lineage works



                    NOBODY would rate Spinks over Tyson... NOT EVEN CLOSE !

                    and nobody would rate him over Holmes either

                    the lineal " champion " in that example... was not even on the same level as the REAL champ

                    so yea... who fkn cares ?

                    Comment

                    • aboutfkntime
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2015
                      • 47370
                      • 1,631
                      • 3,563
                      • 391,308

                      #60
                      will NOBODY address the elephant in the room... ?


                      Canelo was ranked the #1 middleweight on the planet because of lineage... which is ABSOLUTELY ABSURD... because he had never faced a middleweight opponent, and he had never weighed more than 155

                      that post is not going to disappear... like 'WBC WBA IBF' just did when I asked him that question LMAO

                      Marchey... what are your thoughts on the post above ?

                      why does everyone run for the hills whenever I mention it... ?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP