Stephen Espinoza Drops The Truths! "WHYTE WASNT CLEARED, HE WAS ALLOWED TO FIGHT!"

[Alan Smithee]

You said he has a track record for cheating. The first time wasn't cheating but a penalty under the BCCC rules the same agency you claim let fighters get away ?


See when you have a pea brain you cannot keep up ,you seem to have trouble with conflicting posts then take to long to back track and that's bc well...you have a pea brain...….most Wilderettes do. lol

Aren't you the guy who claims that they can't test body hair for steroids. You even came up with a quasi scientific explanation. You obviously have access to the internet. Look it up. I know that you scoff at my copy and pastes.

[Alan Smithee]

Aren't you the guy who claims that they can't test body hair for steroids. You even came up with a quasi scientific explanation. You obviously have access to the internet. Look it up. I know that you scoff at my copy and pastes.

The Carlson Company: We conduct rave drug testing, synthetic drug testing, anabolic steroid testing, ... We can test other body hair including eyebrows, underarm, chest, back, arms, ...

[champion4ever]

They actually can take action on the "A" sample alone but this case has other variables involved. Supposedly he has passed numerous other tests recently including a VADA test two days before the UKAD fail. The levels of metabolites were very low

I know they can take action on the A sample but Dillian Whyte chose to appeal the A sample so he can be allowed to fight.

Also, it's not the amount of the substance that was found in his system, it's the mere fact that he had any traces of that substance in his system at all which is the issue here.

Also, B samples almost always never come back negative or as a false positive. They draw them from their original source as the A sample which is him.

Therefore, the B sample are going to reveal the same as the A sample; Which is Dillian Whyte had two or more banned substances in his system no matter the amount or quantity.

He can't used that over the counter supplement excuse this time because this supplement is very old and rare and is only legal in the U.K.

[Alan Smithee]

I know they can take action on the A sample but Dillian Whyte chose to appeal the A sample so he can be allowed to fight.

Also, it's not the amount of the substance that was found in his system, it's the mere fact that he had any traces of that substance in his system at all which is the issue here.

Also, B samples almost always never come back negative or as a false positive. They draw them from their original source as the A sample which is him.

Therefore, the B sample are going to reveal the same as the A sample; Which is Dillian Whyte had two or more banned substances in his system no matter the amount or quantity.

He can't used that over the counter supplement excuse this time because this supplement is very old and rare and is only legal in the U.K.

I agree. I am not one of his defenders. I am just explaining as to why he probably wasn't suspended already. A positive "B" and he is in trouble.

[champion4ever]

I agree. I am not one of his defenders. I am just explaining as to why he probably wasn't suspended already. A positive "B" and he is in trouble.

It's no problem chief; We all good!

[juggernaut666]

Aren't you the guy who claims that they can't test body hair for steroids. You even came up with a quasi scientific explanation. You obviously have access to the internet. Look it up. I know that you scoff at my copy and pastes.

No simpleton I said recreational drugs are that much different then synthetic testing on short hair,bc it is and that it would be the last option .

Besides that what does that have to do with you making a fool of yourself on here with the claim he wasn't cleared to fight ? You f'ing clown now changing your story about a B sample when we were telling you it doesn't change the fact he was cleared to fight Rivas. lol

Tell us again about Whytes past history of cheating when he doesn't even have a current one as of now ?

[Alan Smithee]

No simpleton I said recreational drugs are that much different then synthetic testing on short hair,bc it is and that it would be the last option .

Besides that what does that have to do with you making a fool of yourself on here with the claim he wasn't cleared to fight ? You f'ing clown now changing your story about a B sample when we were telling you it doesn't change the fact he was cleared to fight Rivas. lol

Changing my story? It was always about the "B" sample. Uh, we know he fought. Some of us actually watched it. The debate was whether he was cleared of a doping charge or was the fight allowed to proceed with an ongoing investigation. Some of you guys believe that he did not test positive and was therefore cleared to fight? We will see in the coming days!

[juggernaut666]

Changing my story? It was always about the "B" sample. Uh, we know he fought. Some of us actually watched it. The debate was whether he was cleared of a doping charge or was the fight allowed to proceed with an ongoing investigation. Some of you guys believe that he did not test positive and was therefore cleared to fight? We will see in the coming days!

You said several times on here he wasn't cleared so no it has nothing to do with B sample ,wow you are ****** theres just no other way to say it. lol

He doesn't have to be cleared of a doping charge if the BCCC deems him fit to fight and has enough evidence to let the fight go or lack of evidence to stop it from going.

O.K my ******ity level is long gone with you here and should have left with redeemer bc you as usual are talking in circles .

[Alan Smithee]

No simpleton I said recreational drugs are that much different then synthetic testing on short hair,bc it is and that it would be the last option .

Besides that what does that have to do with you making a fool of yourself on here with the claim he wasn't cleared to fight ? You f'ing clown now changing your story about a B sample when we were telling you it doesn't change the fact he was cleared to fight Rivas. lol

Tell us again about Whytes past history of cheating when he doesn't even have a current one as of now ?

And here we go:

Whyte has been through this process before, having tested positive for a banned stimulant after his victory against Hungary’s Sandor Balogh in October 2012 and he was given a two-year ban.

Whyte’s defence at the time was that he had made a silly mistake by taking a popular and readily available training supplement without checking its ingredients, not an excuse generally accepted by the anti-doping authorities and his appeal against the sanction was rejected.

Now, having already served one sanction, Whyte is facing the prospect of a lengthy ban for a second offence.



Do you want more?

[Alan Smithee]

No simpleton I said recreational drugs are that much different then synthetic testing on short hair,bc it is and that it would be the last option .

Besides that what does that have to do with you making a fool of yourself on here with the claim he wasn't cleared to fight ? You f'ing clown now changing your story about a B sample when we were telling you it doesn't change the fact he was cleared to fight Rivas. lol

Tell us again about Whytes past history of cheating when he doesn't even have a current one as of now ?

Here we go again:

British heavyweight boxer Dillian Whyte may be banned for eight years from the sport after he tested positive for a banned substance.

The 31-year-old Londoner could face the lengthy ban due to this being his second offence, after serving a two-year ban starting in 2012. The historic punishment was for unknowingly taking an illegal supplement. But if the charges are upheld this time around, the punishment could be far heavier.