Stephen Espinoza Drops The Truths! "WHYTE WASNT CLEARED, HE WAS ALLOWED TO FIGHT!"

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • .!WAR MIKEY!.
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Aug 2015
    • 23780
    • 889
    • 769
    • 309,182

    #1

    Stephen Espinoza Drops The Truths! "WHYTE WASNT CLEARED, HE WAS ALLOWED TO FIGHT!"

  • Mammoth
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2016
    • 35717
    • 3,848
    • 3,389
    • 378,304

    #2
    He's right...........

    Comment

    • KTFOKING
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jun 2018
      • 14399
      • 1,266
      • 284
      • 344,781

      #3
      Yeah, that's a better way to put it. Because of the sample B process and a fighter having a right to get that sample checked, Whyte was able to fight due to that. But UKAD hasn't yet cleared him for the positive test. They may end up doing so, but haven't yet.

      Comment

      • kafkod
        I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2013
        • 24876
        • 2,213
        • 1,829
        • 405,373

        #4
        Originally posted by KTFOKING
        Yeah, that's a better way to put it. Because of the sample B process and a fighter having a right to get that sample checked, Whyte was able to fight due to that. But UKAD hasn't yet cleared him for the positive test. They may end up doing so, but haven't yet.
        That wasn't why he was cleared to fight. UKAD can provisionally suspend a boxer who fails a test immediately and stop him from fighting, without the B sample being opened, if they think it's necessary.
        Last edited by kafkod; 07-29-2019, 02:31 PM.

        Comment

        • DaNeutral.
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Aug 2018
          • 10087
          • 1,665
          • 342
          • 144,794

          #5
          Ofcourse the weasel comes out of the woodwork. He dont know jackus ****us

          Comment

          • Alan Smithee
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2018
            • 2353
            • 280
            • 133
            • 56,492

            #6
            Originally posted by KTFOKING
            Yeah, that's a better way to put it. Because of the sample B process and a fighter having a right to get that sample checked, Whyte was able to fight due to that. But UKAD hasn't yet cleared him for the positive test. They may end up doing so, but haven't yet.
            Don't even waste your breath. I figured Kafkod would chime in. He apparently was in that meeting. Dudes like him put their spin on things until they are proven wrong and then move on to another topic. No action was taken because of fear of liability until more facts such as the results of the "B" sample. There are numerous sources explaining it. It may have something to do with the low levels of the metabolites and that fact that the VADA test on the 15th apparently came back negative. That last statement is my opinion but the first part of my post has been verified by numerous reliable sources.

            Comment

            • REDEEMER
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Oct 2018
              • 11820
              • 1,336
              • 1,008
              • 153,574

              #7
              When does this guy stop lying ? No wonder wilder is connected with people like him ,its a shame. Ha

              Comment

              • rolshans
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2017
                • 1489
                • 43
                • 2
                • 40,737

                #8
                So he was cleared to fight?

                I know in Canada "cleared to do something" is synonymous with "allowed to do something." I imagine it's the same in the US. Not sure the need for semantics.

                Comment

                • KTFOKING
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jun 2018
                  • 14399
                  • 1,266
                  • 284
                  • 344,781

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Brettcappe
                  Don't even waste your breath. I figured Kafkod would chime in. He apparently was in that meeting. Dudes like him put their spin on things until they are proven wrong and then move on to another topic. No action was taken because of fear of liability until more facts such as the results of the "B" sample. There are numerous sources explaining it. It may have something to do with the low levels of the metabolites and that fact that the VADA test on the 15th apparently came back negative. That last statement is my opinion but the first part of my post has been verified by numerous reliable sources.
                  They have released the VADA tests results already and how many samples were taken?

                  Comment

                  • Alan Smithee
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Feb 2018
                    • 2353
                    • 280
                    • 133
                    • 56,492

                    #10
                    Originally posted by rolshans
                    So he was cleared to fight?

                    I know in Canada "cleared to do something" is synonymous with "allowed to do something." I imagine it's the same in the US. Not sure the need for semantics.
                    It's more that he was allowed to fight. No one cleared him of anything. The process is continuing and can take weeks if not months. Hopefully the results of the "B"sample will be made public so there can be more clarity. The details of the fight day meeting were not made public because that is standard procedure. Those on this forum who claim intimate knowledge are full of it. From most reports their were low level metabolites of Dianabol (Metandienone) and the VADA test on the 15th supposedly came back negative. Combine this with Whyte's request for the "B" sample results and there "supposedly" (because the meeting was private) was a decision made to allow the contest to continue with the investigation ongoing. There was a lawsuit filed by footballer Mamadou Sakho in regards to a provisional suspension so the consensus is that the British Boxing board of Control was hesitant to take action without further evidence presented.


                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP