Stephen Espinoza Drops The Truths! "WHYTE WASNT CLEARED, HE WAS ALLOWED TO FIGHT!"

[Alan Smithee]

As of 3 days ago the B-sample has not even been tested. Only Whyte can request it be tested and he probably wont because it will come back the same and BBBoC allowed him to fight.

He actually did request that the "B" sample be tested. He had no choice!

https://www.badlefthook.com/2019/7/2...ar-rivas-fight

[champion4ever]

As of 3 days ago the B-sample has not even been tested. Only Whyte can request it be tested and he probably wont because it will come back the same and BBBoC allowed him to fight.

Absolutely! Which is usually a sign of guilt. Dillian Whyte knew he was dirty all along. These test results should have not remain anonymous as far as another human life is concerned. Oscar Rivas was risking his life in there against a roided up and cheating fighter.

If this is the case, then Jarrell Miller should have fought AJ in the UK instead of the U.S then. At least he would have been allowed to fight; All the while being juiced to the gills and collecting his paycheck in the process.

All he had to do was appeal his A samples. It seems like they do things backwards in the U.K. The BBoC could definitely use a reform. There appears to be a flaw in their system.

[REDEEMER]

"It doesn't matter what is the outcome the fact and sole fact is the commission cleared him to fight".


Lol. Nice defense. Like the Canadian poster you are confusing cleared with allowed. If he failed a drug test then he was not cleared of anything unless they allow drugs, that is! Let's see how this situation "clears" itself out. How about a friendly wager? If the "B" sample comes back negative then Mr. Whyte is cleared. Until then a cloud of su****ion hangs over his head.

The only confused one is you, one cannot be allowed to fight if he isn't cleared ,you would have to really lack intelligence not to get that simple fact which you do.

[Alan Smithee]

Absolutely! Which is usually a sign of guilt. Dillian Whyte knew he was dirty all along. These test results should have not remain anonymous as far as another human life is concerned. Oscar Rivas was risking his life in there against a roided up and cheating fighter.

If this is the case, then Jarrell Miller should have fought AJ in the UK instead of the U.S then. At least he would have been allowed to fight; All the while being juiced to the gills and collecting his paycheck in the process.

All he had to do was appeal his A samples. It seems like they do things backwards in the U.K. The BBoC could definitely use a reform. There appears to be a flaw in their system.

They actually can take action on the "A" sample alone but this case has other variables involved. Supposedly he has passed numerous other tests recently including a VADA test two days before the UKAD fail. The levels of metabolites were very low possibly implying that the "B" sample might not confirm the result. It is probably more of a situation where their hands were tied more than anything else. With the limited information that they had a suspension could have opened them up to litigation. Regardless of their protocols Rivas should have been made aware of the situation. According to rival promoter Frank Warren, Rivas has grounds for a lawsuit in regards to the violation of a "duty to care". The coming days will be interesting.

[EnglishOxide]

people are really defending whyte and hearn wow

None of them have broken any rules as far as we know.

The NAPD, BBoBC, UKAD and VADA all cleared Whyte to fight.

Why wouldn't you defend them?

[Bmore18]

He actually did request that the "B" sample be tested. He had no choice!

https://www.badlefthook.com/2019/7/2...ar-rivas-fight

Thanks, I was going off the Athletic article that said it wasnt tested yet (i guess both can be true). Look forward to the results

[Superbee]

Funny how this discussion turns out when a negative "A" sample would have made none of this drama... But it wasn't negative, so... let's go !

[Alan Smithee]

The only confused one is you, one cannot be allowed to fight if he isn't cleared ,you would have to really lack intelligence not to get that simple fact which you do.

Have you been reading other people's posts? I am the only one confused? It's all in the wording: Allowed,permitted,cleared, approved. When UKAD and the BBB of C finally release a statement along the lines of "we didn't act on that date because of insufficient evidence but now that more facts were provided and the "B" sample was analyzed we are hereby suspending Dillian Whyte, yada,yada,yada. are you and that other jerkoff Kafkod going to eat humble pie? Of course not. You idiots will just move on to another topic like Joshua's resume or some other nonsense.

[Alan Smithee]

Thanks, I was going off the Athletic article that said it wasnt tested yet (i guess both can be true). Look forward to the results

No prob. Will be interesting.

[REDEEMER]

Have you been reading other people's posts? I am the only one confused? It's all in the wording: Allowed,permitted,cleared, approved. When UKAD and the BBB of C finally release a statement along the lines of "we didn't act on that date because of insufficient evidence but now that more facts were provided and the "B" sample was analyzed we are hereby suspending Dillian whyte, yada,yada,yada. are you and that other jerkoff Kafkod going to eat humble pie? Of course not. You idiots will just move on to another topic like Joshua's resume or some other nonsense.

Well name calling doesn't change the fact that Whyte was cleared by two testing agencies and one governing body. Really you cant be that smart not to understand this for real,so like usual its time to bail out on this convo with you as its pointless. Ha