the UK and the merry band of fgt supporters are a friggin disgrace
Stephen Espinoza Drops The Truths! "WHYTE WASNT CLEARED, HE WAS ALLOWED TO FIGHT!"
Collapse
-
-
Which governing body was that? The WBC? They weren't notified! Let's see how this plays out for Mr. Whyte! You think he is free and clear? Repeat offender anyone?
The World Boxing Council (WBC) has demanded British authorities hand over any evidence of Dillian Whyte allegedly failing a drug test before his fight against Oscar Rivas.
It was reported last Wednesday that Whyte had "tested positive for one or more banned substances" prior to the fight, which was allowed to proceed by the British Boxing Board of Control (BBBofC).
Whyte, who served a two-year ban from October 2012 after failing a doping test, could face a fight to save his career if he is shown to have committed a further offence.
The WBC said it had not been privy to any details of a failed test.
"The WBC has not received any notification from anyone about a positive anti-doping test allegedly yielded by Dillian Whyte in connection with last Saturday’s fight against Oscar Rivas for the WBC interim heavyweight championship.
"The WBC has requested that the BBBofC, as the local, governing entity that oversaw that fight, formally provide any available information to the WBC.Comment
-
Hey Curt I should get up and walk over to the nearest wall and **** my head a few times. These dudes don't get it! Did he fail a test for Dianabol, an anabolic steroid or not? This guy was suspended once already. How are they defending this fool? If the "B" sample is negative then I will gladly eat crow but until then " what the fu.k?"Comment
-
Do you think he should have been allowed to fight if dianabol (of all things) was shown up in the test ?Comment
-
i expect nothing less from these twatsHey Curt I should get up and walk over to the nearest wall and **** my head a few times. These dudes don't get it! Did he fail a test for Dianabol, an anabolic steroid or not? This guy was suspended once already. How are they defending this fool? If the "B" sample is negative then I will gladly eat crow but until then " what the fu.k?"
u had lennox, fury, froch, khan and parker ...along with many others...blaiming hearn and company for delaying wilder/joshua yet these fgts were in denial and had their twisted timelines and stories that matched nothing of what we saw and heard
it was pathetic and sad....and now its clear we can all see why...AJ got his heart eaten by a sloppy mexican american who was a replacement...wilder would have probably ended his career and life
these guys are the saddest bunch of losers ive ever seen in life...they literally made up their own stories and timelines and "facts" to try to support their own delusional rants and raves.....Comment
-
Comment
-
UKAD didn't make the decision that was the BBBc and in the event the B sample is the same and another hearing finds wrong doing ,the bout will be ruled a no contest but Whyte was cleared to fight this isn't even disputable. Wheather you believe he was using a banned substance or not the final ruling was to let the fight go on and that's called being cleared to fight ? lolHe definitely wasn’t “Cleared” to fight. The wording makes it look like he is clean and that’s that. UKAD are just scared they would be sued, if and that’s a big “if” Whyte’s B-sample comes back clean, so they had to allow him to fight. So even if Whyte B-sample comes up clean they could be like “Well he can’t Sue sure for lost of earnings”Comment
-
i expect nothing less from these twats
u had lennox, fury, froch, khan and parker ...along with many others...blaiming hearn and company for delaying wilder/joshua yet these fgts were in denial and had their twisted timelines and stories that matched nothing of what we saw and heard
it was pathetic and sad....and now its clear we can all see why...AJ got his heart eaten by a sloppy mexican american who was a replacement...wilder would have probably ended his career and life
these guys are the saddest bunch of losers ive ever seen in life...they literally made up their own stories and timelines and "facts" to try to support their own delusional rants and raves.....
I don't know why I even entertain it and yet i'm "deranged and a fool". Maybe they are right. I must be a fool for engaging in conversation with them. Dudes like Redeemer and Kafkod consistently make unverified opinionated statements and then when the truth comes out, they just rant about something else. Dillian Whyte has a track record with cheating and he "apparently" comes up dirty for D-ball and these characters are defending him!Comment
-
they have nothing else...thats whyI don't know why I even entertain it and yet i'm "deranged and a fool". Maybe they are right. I must be a fool for engaging in conversation with them. Dudes like Redeemer and Kafkod consistently make unverified opinionated statements and then when the truth comes out, they just rant about something else. Dillian Whyte has a track record with cheating and he "apparently" comes up dirty for D-ball and these characters are defending him!
thats why you see guys still defening lil g tooth n nail....thats all theyve known...and in the face of something obviously different they have to refute it with everything theyve got...their internet pride and ego wont let them lose to faceless, nameless, internet entity...yet theyve spent countless hours creating an internet entity.....puffing their proverbial chests out over a guy theyve never met...and when he gets exposed they cant come to grips with it....why? because its the internet and nobody can ever really lose on the net if nobody knows the actual identity of the other side.....and these guys hang and cling to that
"im a nameless and faceless person....so my guy got his arse beat? guess what? ill blame the judges... the "home ref"...or headbutts and elbows.....oh did i mention crooked judges yet"?!?!?!Comment
Comment