Stephen Espinoza Drops The Truths! "WHYTE WASNT CLEARED, HE WAS ALLOWED TO FIGHT!"

[Alan Smithee]

I apologize guys for extending these posts. Some dudes on here just don't get it. I am not posting my opinions about the Dillian Whyte situation. It is all sourced material. It may not all be 100% percent accurate because of the secrecy involved in this case but it is from reliable sources. I am obviously wasting my time with the Whyte defenders but those with an open mind hopefully appreciate the info.

[Redd Foxx]

I apologize guys for extending these posts. Some dudes on here just don't get it. I am not posting my opinions about the Dillian Whyte situation. It is all sourced material. It may not all be 100% percent accurate because of the secrecy involved in this case but it is from reliable sources. I am obviously wasting my time with the Whyte defenders but those with an open mind hopefully appreciate the info.

It seems you haven't noticed so I'll help you out here. There's certain fanbases that can't be reasoned with and that won't ever open their mind to the possibility that their guy is in the wrong. Hardcore Pac fans, GG fans, Canelo, Mayweather, and in the UK they have a pro-UK fanbase that defends anything and everything that's British. You could have a notarized letter from Whyte saying he popped 3 Dbol a day at the start of a cycle in March and these guys would state it was untrue, a setup, a cloned Dylian Whyte disseminating misinformation, etc.

Not worth arguing with them. Just present your facts and know some people aren't interested in facts.

[Alan Smithee]

It seems you haven't noticed so I'll help you out here. There's certain fanbases that can't be reasoned with and that won't ever open their mind to the possibility that their guy is in the wrong. Hardcore Pac fans, GG fans, Canelo, Mayweather, and in the UK they have a pro-UK fanbase that defends anything and everything that's British. You could have a notarized letter from Whyte saying he popped 3 Dbol a day at the start of a cycle in March and these guys would state it was untrue, a setup, a cloned Dylian Whyte disseminating misinformation, etc.

Not worth arguing with them. Just present your facts and know some people aren't interested in facts.

Thanks Redd. Very frustrating dealing with close minded dudes! If Whyte's "B" sample is dirty then he's fu.ked, if it's clean then he is good to go. Why is that so difficult to comprehend?lol

[Ake-Dawg]

It doesn't matter what I think the real life ruling does and that was he was cleared . Its not that simple if traces were found while he passed another testing agency . The ruling could be reversed and the outcome changed but its pointless in arguing with me he wasn't cleared because he was.

Cleared or allowed. The hearing was to decide whether or not to stop the fight. No one cleared Whyte. That’s just the word Hearn used and now others are repeating.

[strykr619]

This makes a difference because? He wasn't cleared yet the let the fight proceed..... So if someone got killed in this fight is the UK Government willing to pay out from the massive lawsuit that would happen after the fact.

If they KNEW HIS "A" SAMPLE WAS DIRTY THE FIGHT SHOULD HAVE BEEN POSTPONED PENDING CONFIRMATION FROM "B" SAMPLE. Once again Money talks bull**** walks.... Talk about corruption.

[Ray*]

UKAD didn't make the decision that was the BBBc and in the event the B sample is the same and another hearing finds wrong doing ,the bout will be ruled a no contest but Whyte was cleared to fight this isn't even disputable. Wheather you believe he was using a banned substance or not the final ruling was to let the fight go on and that's called being cleared to fight ? lol

Whoever made the decision did so to cover themselves from being sued. Whether it’s the BBBofC or UKAD. I know they would rather ban him until his B-sample confirms this positive test, but they allowed the fight in case his B-sample comes back clean and they get sued for loss of earning.

I just think there should be transparency in it for Team Rivas. Do I understand why they allow Whyte to fight? Yes, but for one Team rivas should have been allowed to be notify, then the decision can be made to forfeit the fight or go ahead with it.

Another thing is the rules needs to be altered, if your A-sample comes back positive then they should have the rights stop a fight from going ahead without you having the rights to sue them IF your B-sample comes back clean.

[_Rexy_]

You said he has a track record for cheating. The first time wasn't cheating but a penalty under the BCCC rules the same agency you claim let fighters get away ?


See when you have a pea brain you cannot keep up ,you seem to have trouble with conflicting posts then take to long to back track and that's bc well...you have a pea brain...….most Wilderettes do. lol

First time he took a banned substance going into a fight, that’s the definition of cheating you idiot.

Whyte has a track record of cheating. Just like you have a track record of saying ****** ****

[_Rexy_]

UKAD didn't make the decision that was the BBBc and in the event the B sample is the same and another hearing finds wrong doing ,the bout will be ruled a no contest but Whyte was cleared to fight this isn't even disputable. Wheather you believe he was using a banned substance or not the final ruling was to let the fight go on and that's called being cleared to fight ? lol

He was using a banned substance. He tested positive for it. It’s definitive proof.

You’re the type of idiot that would be on jury duty like “yeah he’s on tape and he left fingerprints and DNA, but it’s only 3 finger prints and only one DNA sample. NOT GUILTY”

Then you’d give a couple *******s. Because that’s how you roll.

[_Rexy_]

Whoever made the decision did so to cover themselves from being sued. Whether it’s the BBBofC or UKAD. I know they would rather ban him until his B-sample confirms this positive test, but they allowed the fight in case his B-sample comes back clean and they get sued for loss of earning.

I just think there should be transparency in it for Team Rivas. Do I understand why they allow Whyte to fight? Yes, but for one Team rivas should have been allowed to be notify, then the decision can be made to forfeit the fight or go ahead with it.

Another thing is the rules needs to be altered, if your A-sample comes back positive then they should have the rights stop a fight from going ahead without you having the rights to sue them IF your B-sample comes back clean.

None of this “he’s innocent until proven guilty, we need to wait on the B test” bull***** either. If you fail the A test, you’re guilty and it’s your responsibility to prove your innocent.

Where do we stop? Canelo failed A and B tests, and fans were saying to test hair. Enough is enough. These cheats will always have an excuse

[Alan Smithee]

None of this “he’s innocent until proven guilty, we need to wait on the B test” bull***** either. If you fail the A test, you’re guilty and it’s your responsibility to prove your innocent.

Where do we stop? Canelo failed A and B tests, and fans were saying to test hair. Enough is enough. These cheats will always have an excuse

Employment drug testing tests the "B" sample right after the "A" comes back positive. An employee is not even notified until the "B" is positive. I get having a witness present for athletes with the "B" sample but they should call you immediately for you to either attend in person or send a witness. If Whyte's "A" sample was positive on the 17th then his "B" should have been tested within 48 hours by the 19th. This whole mess stinks of corruption. Like rival promoter Frank warren said Rivas should sue for a violation of "duty to care". It may take litigation for the brits to get their act together!