Did Pulev earn a title shot with AJ?

[DreamFighter]

PUlev has never earned a shot in his life.

[DreamFighter]

Riiight...so then Wilder goes on to fight Ortiz and Fury, both took steroids too, no problem. That blows up your entire theory. Wilder is a bum beater and you guys need to stop making excuses for him.

in the past they did.

PEDvetkin was going into his title challenge on PEDs. He went in with full knowledge thathe was pumped up and might commit manslaughter in doing so. He is an evil man. There is no precedent for letting him off.

[Eff Pandas]

Technically he did earn his place in line I believe so yea I guess he did. But sh^t man who cares really?!?! There is the Wilder fight that should be what everyone most wants to see, there is Fury who could cut into the line in a big way in a few weeks & there is maybe 3 or 4 guys of interest to fight Joshua. Pulev isn't one of them. But he's a mando now so he's in line. Fair play to him.

[alexguiness]

Beats Poohie Fury in a snoozefest...wins the Nigerian Lottery.

[Marchegiano]

One failed fight against Povetkin lead to 5 title defenses against bums

I've heard it all.

I don't know why you waste your time responding to me. We both know you're just going to hide from me and make children's threads about whose sneakers you think are snazziest or some such similar ******ity.


Just like the last run-in Laced; If you don't have any issues with points I made then what is the point of crying at me to let me know you dislike the conclusion I came to?

Have you got a pee-pee son? I reckon yer'uh womurn.

[DaaamnSon]

This Pulev mandatory has been a long time coming and will probably be AJ's second or third fight next year hopefully after the Fury/Wilder winner.

Wins against Fury/Wilder, Miller, Pulev next year should cement his the top ten p4p list.

[LacedUp]

I don't know why you waste your time responding to me. We both know you're just going to hide from me and make children's threads about whose sneakers you think are snazziest or some such similar ******ity.


Just like the last run-in Laced; If you don't have any issues with points I made then what is the point of crying at me to let me know you dislike the conclusion I came to?

Have you got a pee-pee son? I reckon yer'uh womurn.

what run in?

I don't even know who you are. hahaha

[4truth]

So who else is there?? Wilder is the fight to make but Pulev is certainly ahead of the likes of Breazeale, Whyte, Chisora, and Miller.

[Marchegiano]

what run in?

I don't even know who you are. hahaha

It shouldn't be hard, given the forum keeps track of these things, for you to simply look at the last time you responded to me. I don't know you either, but I know last time you responded to me I gave you a reply, and it seems even followed you into another thread to announce you've run away from me.

So I reckon I've given you ample opportunity both directly and indirectly and in both cases you, of your own accord, chose to not address a single issue I raise but rather simple inform me you dislike what I've said.

This is the first time you've even responded to me questioning your ducking my responses and your still ducking the point of them......so why should I have anything more to say to than questioning why you'd elect my attention be on you again knowing you don't actually want to speak with me?

I am of course going to call you Sally when you minge and have nothing more to express but minging. What else is there to say? I can clearly drone on and reword the same expression yet again but I reckon by now you have to get it. From where I sit you are a ***** and nothing more. Look for yourself and tell me you've given me a reason to believe anything other than you're a *****.

[LacedUp]

It shouldn't be hard, given the forum keeps track of these things, for you to simply look at the last time you responded to me. I don't know you either, but I know last time you responded to me I gave you a reply, and it seems even followed you into another thread to announce you've run away from me.

So I reckon I've given you ample opportunity both directly and indirectly and in both cases you, of your own accord, chose to not address a single issue I raise but rather simple inform me you dislike what I've said.

This is the first time you've even responded to me questioning your ducking my responses and your still ducking the point of them......so why should I have anything more to say to than questioning why you'd elect my attention be on you again knowing you don't actually want to speak with me?

I am of course going to call you Sally when you minge and have nothing more to express but minging. What else is there to say? I can clearly drone on and reword the same expression yet again but I reckon by now you have to get it. From where I sit you are a ***** and nothing more. Look for yourself and tell me you've given me a reason to believe anything other than you're a *****.

No really. I don't know who you are.