Originally posted by OCPancho
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: WBC Grants Canelo Voluntary Defense, Then Charlo-Golovkin Winner
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Diego Rodriguez View PostWhy wouldn't a supposed Charlo fan want to see him face the Champion, who is now Canelo, (and clearly the biggest money fighter too).
This is utterly mind boggling that a supposed fan of Charlo wouldn't be calling for Canelo.
Are you scared that Canelo is too much for Charlo or deep down you really believe Golovkin is still the top dog? Your desperation is betraying your deep insecurities.
YOU though have a major problem with Jermall fighting Triple L, that is CLEAR!
Jermall vs golovkin!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Diego Rodriguez View PostYou've made it clear now . . . you want Charlo to beat the guy you feel is the best MW. You want Charlo to show once and for all who is the best and to do so he has to beat the best. I get it now Dull Razor. You couldn't say it because you have to keep your cred with the lil' G posse but I get it . . . wink wink Golovkin is the man. To be the man you got to beat the man.
Jermall vs golovkin!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Caxcan View PostFunny how people are accusing the WBC of bias in favor of Canelo when they had no problem with them overstepping their boundaries and essentially screwing Canelo over during initial negotiations with GGG by arbitrarily appointing GGG the mandatory to the WBC title and imposing an arbitrary timeline and inflated purse split while GGG faced no such pressure from the WBA.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Caxcan View PostFunny how people are accusing the WBC of bias in favor of Canelo when they had no problem with them overstepping their boundaries and essentially screwing Canelo over during initial negotiations with GGG by arbitrarily appointing GGG the mandatory to the WBC title and imposing an arbitrary timeline and inflated purse split while GGG faced no such pressure from the WBA.
The WBC approached Golovkin and asked him to step aside so the Cotto Canelo match could go forward. The winner was to fight Golovkin.
https://www.***************.net/2015/05/23/sulaiman-says-ggg-will-step-aside-for-cotto-v-canelo-face-the-winner/
Comment
-
Originally posted by Diego Rodriguez View PostIt is silly. IMO there really was only two choices.
1) Rematch (or third) fight due to the controversial decision. I believe this would have been the right call.
2) If you didn't believe it was controversial than next guy up (Charlo). And no Charlo doesn't have to fight Golovkin.
Seems pretty straightforward to me. BTW I don't blame Canelo for this, this is just WBC trying to get on Canelo's good side.
In the end it doesn't matter at all. Canelo and Golovkin are going to do what ever the *** they want.
Jermall vs golovkin!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by icha View Postcanelo, jacobs , lemule, rubio, stevens... canelo shatered trouts chin, he was dropped like ten times after that, but charlo wasnt one of those..
Jermall vs golovkin!
Comment
-
Comment