Haymon killing another unification fight?

[saintpat]

Has Bob actually made an offer?

[N/A]

If Hearn had lied to Ryabinsky about the proposed date of the unification with Wilder, he would have ended up in court as soon as the truth came out.

There was no need to lie about anything. Ryabinsky knew Hearn was negotiating with both sides to try to get the best deal possible and knew Povetkin was Hearn's preference. What is there to sue over? You're not making any sense. You have no experience in boxing and no experience in the legal system. You're just a random idiot on the internet.

[N/A]

Povetkin is AJ's mando and his promoter is probably the richest man in world boxing. Hearn would have had to make Povetkin a very good offer, substantially more than his mandated cut, to avoid losing the fight to Ryabinsky on a purse bid.

Of course he made Povetkin a good offer. You have to when you want a mandatory to give you a rematch clause.

[kafkod]

When Wilder sent Joshua a term sheet for 50 million, it clearly stated there would be no interim fights and that their fight would take place in November or December. Deals are done all the time without a specific date, but there is language guaranteeing the fight is next and the window of time the fight must take place in.

What fck were you smoking when you wrote that?

Wilder never sent AJ any term sheet for any $50million offer!

When asked Finkel to let him see the details of the offer, Finkel told him AJ had to accept the offer first, then he could see the details and terms.

[N/A]

Wilder never sent AJ any term sheet for any $50million offer!

The broadcaster says you're lying.

https://twitter.com/stephenespinoza/status/1012122827049168896

[kafkod]

So Hearn was either being sneaky, or is completely incompetent, because the contract he sent conveniently left out any language whatsoever that would bound him to doing the fight next. And when he was asked to add language guaranteeing the fight would be next, he refused.

I'm challenging you again to stop deflecting and show me some evidence of what you are saying there.

You can't because it never happened!

[kafkod]

The broadcaster says you're lying.

https://twitter.com/stephenespinoza/...22827049168896

The broadcaster who is a direct business rival of Hearn, and whose network Wilder has a contract with?



Hearn himself replies to that tweet refuting what Espinoza is saying, and Espinoza then backs down and disappears.

1. I’m responding to comments that proof of funds were provided - no they weren’t. 2. I asked for a contract - this was flat out refused. 3. Does Deontay have a contract with Showtime? 4. Goodnight

— Eddie Hearn (@EddieHearn) June 28, 2018

[N/A]

I'm challenging you again to stop deflecting and show me some evidence of what you are saying there.

Nobody is deflecting. Sorry you don't like the facts. Not even Hearn is claiming what you're claiming. Finkel said there was never a contract for a 2018 fight. Hearn has never said otherwise. Only you say otherwise.

[N/A]

The broadcaster who is a direct business rival of Hearn, and whose network Wilder has a contract with?

Wilder doesn't have a contract with them. Stop posting false information.

Hearn himself replies to that tweet refuting what Espinoza is saying

No, he didn't refute what Espinoza said. This is the problem over and over. You don't actually know how to read. The things I write, the things others write, your brain fills in the blanks and reads what it wants to read.

Espinoza confirmed Hearn was sent a term sheet. HEARN DIDN'T REFUTE THAT. Please show us where he refuted that? You can't. Hearn, being the master manipulator that he is, CHANGED THE SUBJECT, and said he wasn't sent a contract. Which is true. Because in boxing, you don't send a contract until a term sheet has been agreed to.

Hearn could have very easily denied receiving a term sheet. But he didn't deny it. Espinoza was clearly telling the truth.

[daggum]

Wilder doesn't have a contract with them. Stop posting false information.




No, he didn't refute what Espinoza said. This is the problem over and over. You don't actually know how to read. The things I write, the things others write, your brain fills in the blanks and reads what it wants to read.

Espinoza confirmed Hearn was sent a term sheet. HEARN DIDN'T REFUTE THAT. Please show us where he refuted that? You can't. Hearn, being the master manipulator that he is, CHANGED THE SUBJECT, and said he wasn't sent a contract. Which is true. Because in boxing, you don't send a contract until a term sheet has been agreed to.

Hearn could have very easily denied receiving a term sheet. But he didn't deny it. Espinoza was clearly telling the truth.

are you the wbc wba or ibf today?