Why is the WBC wrong for enforcing a mandatory on GGG?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Real King Kong
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 12029
    • 460
    • 24
    • 105,905

    #21
    who said the wbc is wrong for enforcing a mandatory? What's wrong is guys like charlo and derevyanchenko being mandatories in the first place. Who have they beaten? Seems like every name guy in the mw division is hanging around waiting for a shot at the belts while fighting nobodies. Ggg can't fight everyone at once...the division would be much more interesting if some of these other guys started fighting each other.

    Comment

    • Pac=Duran
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2015
      • 4888
      • 1,002
      • 585
      • 37,893

      #22
      Originally posted by larryxxx..
      There seemed to be no problem when they did it with Canelo for GGG..All the other mando's GGG had to fight were fine with his fans..So why is Charlo an issue?
      GGG is getting punished by the corrupt WBC for calling out drug cheat scum Canelo and then not taking the bull**** offer afterward.

      GGG vs Charlo is a fight everyone wants to see but GGG shouldnt have to drop a belt just cos he wouldn't take the **** of Canelo and his WBC scumbag friends.

      Comment

      • Dolor
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Jul 2012
        • 619
        • 141
        • 184
        • 11,823

        #23
        Originally posted by larryxxx..
        There seemed to be no problem when they did it with Canelo for GGG..All the other mando's GGG had to fight were fine with his fans..So why is Charlo an issue?
        No issue at all if they enforce it directly AFTER the (enforced) fight with the IBF mandatory.

        Comment

        • Eff Pandas
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2012
          • 52129
          • 3,624
          • 2,147
          • 1,635,919

          #24
          Originally posted by Jubei
          Who said its a problem?
          This.

          Who's got a problem with it?

          If you mfers make a thread & saying mfers doing x & then don't name those saying x then idkwtf you are even trying to do here.

          Link mfers names who are saying this at least, but lets not act like some invisible number of critical mass fans are saying something they clearly aren't.

          Comment

          • pepzz
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 1553
            • 90
            • 115
            • 25,359

            #25
            Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI-
            i just hope GGG-Charlo is on free tv
            Ofcourse tripple beg can't sell PPV's because his fans dont support him with their hard earned money.

            Comment

            • Buckfever
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • May 2006
              • 1742
              • 24
              • 8
              • 10,197

              #26
              Originally posted by larryxxx..
              There seemed to be no problem when they did it with Canelo for GGG..All the other mando's GGG had to fight were fine with his fans..So why is Charlo an issue?
              Because some of us like Charlo and view him potentially as the future of the MW division and think it's too soon for him now when he's not ready. He just got to middleweight and his competition there hasn't been much.

              Also some of us view this as a pressure tactic by the WBC to pressure Golovkin on behalf of Canelo as the Charlo fight is clearly not lucrative for Golovkin.

              I would just like to see Charlo fight a few more times first.
              And I'm not saying he absolutely can't win, but for sure he's going to get hurt and that's not how you bring a guy up.

              Comment

              • BoxingIsGreat
                The Champ
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 19470
                • 1,684
                • 2,397
                • 1,062,888

                #27
                Originally posted by Real King Kong
                who said the wbc is wrong for enforcing a mandatory? What's wrong is guys like charlo and derevyanchenko being mandatories in the first place. Who have they beaten? Seems like every name guy in the mw division is hanging around waiting for a shot at the belts while fighting nobodies. Ggg can't fight everyone at once...the division would be much more interesting if some of these other guys started fighting each other.
                These guys make the division interesting. Who have they beaten?

                Who has Wade beaten? Who has Lemieux beaten? For that matter, who have ALL the guys on GGG resume beaten? Which great fighter has GGG himself beaten? None.

                You can't pick and choose avoiding mandos when it suits you, by saying who have they beaten?

                The guys you are trying to put down are strong and fresh and lots of fans wanna find out what GGG can do to them.

                Comment

                • j0zef
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Oct 2015
                  • 8440
                  • 645
                  • 767
                  • 45,501

                  #28
                  Because IBF mandated theirs first?

                  If you're a boxing fan, the last thing we need is the dissolution of the titles. Realistically, the only ones clamoring for this are low IQ, known burger flipping imbecile-haters who have have continually hated on Golovin for last 3 years.

                  Shut the *** up and let boxing rules take effect. Golovkin waited for 3+ years to get a mandatory shot at WBC. Charlo can wait his turn after Derevyanchenko.

                  Comment

                  • boliodogs
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 33358
                    • 824
                    • 1,782
                    • 309,589

                    #29
                    There is nothing wrong with it but the WBC isn't enforcing it as hard as they could. They say it's OK if he rematches Canelo first and then fights Jermall next. If he doesn't fight Canelo then he must fight Jermall or be stripped.It seems like they are using Jermall to try to push GGG into accepting Golden Boy's terms to rematch Canelo. They could demand GGG fight Jermall next instead of Canelo but they don't want that. If GGG fights either Canelo or Jermall he will still lose a belt for not fighting the Russian. No matter who GGG fights next he will lose a belt and maybe 2 belts. I think most boxing fans will continue to recognize GGG as the true champion until some middleweight beats him or he retires.

                    Comment

                    • Zaroku
                      RIP BIg Dawg Larry & Walt
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 53353
                      • 4,761
                      • 10,926
                      • 389,015

                      #30
                      Originally posted by larryxxx..
                      There seemed to be no problem when they did it with Canelo for GGG..All the other mando's GGG had to fight were fine with his fans..So why is Charlo an issue?
                      Larry, homie, stop pointing out the truth... it’s gonna lead you, me, etc, into a real truth that real dudes, know, and see.

                      I can’t answer you... wish I could.. wish I could...

                      Peace.. I pray to GOD that our children live better lives than we ever lived... homie, that’s good enough for me... I’ll take whatever crumbs I can get...


                      Peace...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP