Why is the WBC wrong for enforcing a mandatory on GGG?

[Phenom]

GGG can only fight one guy at a time and the IBF ordered a mandatory

IBF and WBC need to work this out

[EL_GRINGO]

they ain't,i wanna see that fight

[turnedup]

Zero issue with it at all but the way they framed it makes it seem like they are trying to gestapo Golovkin into doing what they want. Suliaman seems to want that belt around the waist of a Mexican fighter by any means and the fact he's exempting the mandatory in favor of Canelo shows that. Honestly, the worst thing that can happen for Charlo is that Canelo somehow ending up with that belt, he'll be in the same exact position Golovkin was in chasing it for years. They will not force Canelo into fighting Charlo and we all know that and we know it'll be because they don't want him dumping the belt. Personally if that belt is coming out of Golovkin's hands anyway it should go to someone who isn't going to tell the commission what to do, so i'm cool with him fighting Charlo, i'm cool with him fighting Derveychenko, i'm cool with him fighting Saunders if the Canelo fight doesn't happen.

[TonyGe]

Zero issue with it at all but the way they framed it makes it seem like they are trying to gestapo Golovkin into doing what they want. Suliaman seems to want that belt around the waist of a Mexican fighter by any means and the fact he's exempting the mandatory in favor of Canelo shows that. Honestly, the worst thing that can happen for Charlo is that Canelo somehow ending up with that belt, he'll be in the same exact position Golovkin was in chasing it for years. They will not force Canelo into fighting Charlo and we all know that and we know it'll be because they don't want him dumping the belt. Personally if that belt is coming out of Golovkin's hands anyway it should go to someone who isn't going to tell the commission what to do, so i'm cool with him fighting Charlo, i'm cool with him fighting Derveychenko, i'm cool with him fighting Saunders if the Canelo fight doesn't happen.

Never thought of it that way. I think your right. Canello getting the belt would be a disaster for Charlo.

[Shape up]

There seemed to be no problem when they did it with Canelo for GGG..All the other mando's GGG had to fight were fine with his fans..So why is Charlo an issue?

It isnt an issue larry,, they just need to work out which order the mandos are in, i think the WBC wants to try and hand the belt back to canelo due to some of the comments coming from them

[Pago007]

Ggg had options had he fought the IBF mandatory on 5/5. Fighting was an easy fight but caused a cluster**** of problems

[W1LL]

Who is the mandatory?

[W1LL]

If the mandatory is Jermall Charlo, as some of you buffoons seem to be implying, then that is great news.

[Chuckguy]

There seemed to be no problem when they did it with Canelo for GGG..All the other mando's GGG had to fight were fine with his fans..So why is Charlo an issue?

Is canelo the #1 rated boxer? If he is then there shouldn’t be an issue but if I remember a fighter that is suspended can’t be ranked so they can’t say sh it larry ans you know it. It still all politics and about money nothing more.

[Chuckguy]

i just hope GGG-Charlo is on free tv

It won’t be buddy. It’s going to be ppv ans it will do about 101k buys