41 years old Klitschko vs 38 years old Ortiz - who is a better fighter?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sid-Knee
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Oct 2015
    • 18249
    • 1,091
    • 731
    • 155,532

    #41
    Originally posted by DramaShow
    This fight has really brought out the ******s. I don't care about their official age, just compare the physical condition of the two. If someone tells me Ortiz (best win Bryant Jennings) is a better win then wlad (haye, povetkin, pulev and many others) then I can't take them seriously. Don't care what other opinions they've got on the sport, cause they don't know what they are on about. The difference in quality on display between the two fights was ridiculous.
    You know what Americans are like. Just laugh are their complete madness.

    Comment

    • Szef
      Face of Boxing
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Feb 2012
      • 15016
      • 2,488
      • 1,556
      • 253,303

      #42
      Originally posted by Cutthroat
      Ortiz-80% KO ratio

      Sanders-67% KO ratio

      Thompson-57% KO ratio

      Ortiz is a level beyond both fighters in terms of skill and power
      Based on nothing but your wild imagination. Both Thompson and Sanders were more proven and had better resumes.

      Originally posted by joseph5620
      Pretty much this. From a historical context Wlad is obviously better. But that's not the question and the dates of the fight can't be ignored. Wlad was declining before the Fury loss.

      Ortiz was definitely the more dangerous fighter at the time of the fights. Joshua beat a clearly diminished version of Klitschko and that shouldn't even be a debate.
      Originally posted by joseph5620
      There is no evidence of Ortiz declining. You can speculate about his age but nothing previous to this fight exposed him as a "seriously" declining fighter. Nothing.
      How would these fights go in your opinion

      Ortiz vs Fury (in 2015)

      Klitschko vs Malik Scott, David Allen, David Martz (at the time Ortiz fought them)

      Comment

      • Sid-Knee
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2015
        • 18249
        • 1,091
        • 731
        • 155,532

        #43
        Originally posted by joseph5620
        Pretty much this. From a historical context Wlad is obviously better. But that's not the question and the dates of the fight can't be ignored. Wlad was declining before the Fury loss.

        Ortiz was definitely the more dangerous fighter at the time of the fights. Joshua beat a clearly diminished version of Klitschko and that shouldn't even be a debate.
        Wlad was in much better shape than Ortiz was. Luis didn't do anything for the first 6 rounds. He then lands a few nothing punches which has Wilder disco dancing, then he gasses out badly.

        The quality between Wlad and Ortiz is night and day. Wlad clearly was the superior fighter. Clearly.

        Comment

        • Mister Wolf
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jan 2012
          • 7440
          • 242
          • 15
          • 107,507

          #44
          Originally posted by Sid-Knee
          Yes, because Ortiz looked stellar against Allen and Scott didn't he.

          Well done for showing no bias in any way. Good day.
          Doesn't matter whether he looked steller. He won and didn't look like a shot fighter, nor did he fight Wilder having been inactive for a year and a half.

          Comment

          • Cutthroat
            SOG Ward 32-0
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Aug 2006
            • 7840
            • 403
            • 342
            • 47,242

            #45
            Originally posted by Sid-Knee
            The thing is, Ortiz lost his power 2-3 years ago. Those punches were not heavy in the slightest. Still had Wilder all over the place ready to go though.
            No he didn't, Ortiz has literally stopped every single fighter put in front of him aside of Scott who is a solid defensive fighter/mover that was in pure survival mode, still got put down multiple times.

            You take away the no contests on his resume and his KO % shoots up even more.

            Comment

            • RussB23
              Loma Crew
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jul 2015
              • 4329
              • 154
              • 66
              • 12,195

              #46
              Big fan of Ortiz, gotta say wlad though. He dominated for years and was still very good when he fought joshua.

              Comment

              • Sid-Knee
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Oct 2015
                • 18249
                • 1,091
                • 731
                • 155,532

                #47
                Originally posted by joseph5620
                There is no evidence of Ortiz declining. You can speculate about his age but nothing previous to this fight exposed him as a "seriously" declining fighter. Nothing.
                If you couldn't see that Ortiz was clearly past it over the last couple of years, then you need your eyes looking at. Because you're as blind as a bat.

                Comment

                • Cutthroat
                  SOG Ward 32-0
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Aug 2006
                  • 7840
                  • 403
                  • 342
                  • 47,242

                  #48
                  Originally posted by LacedUp
                  Based on what?
                  Based on statistics and resumes. Ortiz' KO ratio is actually in the 90% range when you take out the no contests and DQ he suffered. Only Scott has gone the distance and even he got battered.

                  Everyone knows Sanders was a glass cannon, he lost to Rahman and we know where Rahman himself was with his loss to Maskaev. We know where guys like Tua, Johnson, etc. all these heavies from the past era are and they're not on Ortiz' level at all.

                  Comment

                  • Sid-Knee
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Oct 2015
                    • 18249
                    • 1,091
                    • 731
                    • 155,532

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Mister Wolf
                    Doesn't matter whether he looked steller. He won and didn't look like a shot fighter, nor did he fight Wilder having been inactive for a year and a half.
                    Ortiz has looked like **** for years now. Don't try and paint it any other way.

                    Comment

                    • Sid-Knee
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Oct 2015
                      • 18249
                      • 1,091
                      • 731
                      • 155,532

                      #50
                      Originally posted by Cutthroat
                      No he didn't, Ortiz has literally stopped every single fighter put in front of him aside of Scott who is a solid defensive fighter/mover that was in pure survival mode, still got put down multiple times.

                      You take away the no contests on his resume and his KO % shoots up even more.
                      He's lost his power, man. That was clear to see last night. Nothing he hit Wilder with had much on them. Just goes to show how good Wilder's punch resistance is.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP